Quote# 136125



["Someone has to step in," Auernheimer, 32, said on the podcast Radical Agenda, hosted by Christopher Cantwell, one of the white nationalists who attended the deadly Charlottesville rally. “If you don’t let us dissent peacefully, then our only option is to murder you. To kill your children. To kill your whole families. There is only one thing absent free speech that we can do to express our dissent and that’s to slaughter you like dogs, and you’re gonna have it coming and your children will deserve to die.”]

weev, Twitter 19 Comments [1/20/2018 1:14:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 16

Quote# 136154

lol...There isn't a evolutionists in the history of the group that hasn't quit a debate with me. I have made fool out of everyone of them, including [...].

And, it do it by quoting different factions of evolutionists that rip the other faction's version of evolution to shreds.

The fossil record matches Creationist model and completely contradicts Darwin.

If you want to debate that point, I'll kick your ass.

It's ridiculous to think the first of all fossilized species appear fully-formed with no history of evolving. It's not possible. Nor is it possible we'd find soft tissue inside dinosaur bones if dinosaurs existed millions of years ago. REAL science on fossilization says that is impossible.

Leftists are deluded and arrogant. That will get you an eternal ticket to hell. So be it.

kirkz2006@yahoo.com, Realabortiondebate 19 Comments [1/21/2018 7:50:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 46959

The Crusades was an integral part of the fight between Islam's desire to dominate the world, suffice it to say. Don't use diversion tactics, please.

Bronwyn, WoW offtopic 38 Comments [9/10/2008 12:17:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Worldsend

Quote# 124567

[From "Catherine Booth ...A BAD EXAMPLE FOR CHRISTIAN WOMEN TODAY!"]

Biography of Catherine Booth

Comments by David J. Stewart: I've commented the following biography in bold green type

Catherine Booth (1829-1890), the daughter of a coachbuilder, was born in Ashbourne, Derbyshire, in 1829. When she was a child the family moved to Boston, Lincolnshire and later they lived in Brixton, London.

Catherine was a devout Christian and by the age of twelve she had read the Bible eight times. She had a social conscience from an early age. On one occasion she protested to the local policeman that he had been too rough on a drunken man he had arrested and frog-marched to the local lock-up.

Catherine did not enjoy good health. At the age of fourteen she developed spinal curvature and four years later, incipient tuberculosis. It was while she was ill in bed that she began writing articles for magazines warning of the dangers of drinking alcohol. Catherine was a member of the local Band of Hope and a supporter of the national Temperance Society.

In 1852 Catherine met William Booth, a Methodist minister. William had strong views on the role of church ministers believing they should be "loosing the chains of injustice, freeing the captive and oppressed, sharing food and home, clothing the naked, and carrying out family responsibilities."

Catherine shared William's commitment to social reform but disagreed with his views on women.

NOTE: William Booth has no business marrying a woman who didn't believe in wifely Biblical submission.

Catherine was an avowed feminist.

NOTE: This is a shame. For any professed Christian wife to publickly voice her disagreement with her husband is sinful. Feminism is a rotten evil in any society, church, or home. Shame on Catherine Booth!

On one occasion she objected to William describing women as the "weaker sex."

NOTE: Catherine Booth rejected the plain Scriptural teaching that women are the weaker sex. 1st peter 3:7... "Likewise, ye husbands, dwell with them according to knowledge, giving honour unto the wife, as unto the weaker vessel, and as being heirs together of the grace of life; that your prayers be not hindered." Catherine Booth disobeyed God, by rebelling against her husband and the Bible. Catherine Booth is a disgrace to womanhood.

William was also opposed to the idea of women preachers. When Catherine argued with William about this he added that although he would not stop Catherine from preaching he would "not like it." Despite their disagreements about the role of women in the church, the couple married on 16th June 1855, at Stockwell New Chapel.

NOTE: William Booth sinned, by unequally yoking together in marriage with a woman who didn't wholly believe the Bible (2nd Corinthians 6:14-17). The Bible instructs us to SEPARATE from those who walk worldly... "But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat" (1st Corinthians 5:11). This would definitely forbid marrying a feminist!!!

It was not until 1860 that Catherine first started to preach. One day in Gateshead Bethseda Chapel, a strange compulsion seized her and she felt she must rise and speak. Later she recalled how an inner voice taunted her: "You will look like a fool and have nothing to say". Catherine decided that this was the Devil's voice: "That's just the point," she retorted, "I have never yet been willing to be a fool for Christ. Now I will be one."

NOTE: It was the Devil's voice alright, that seized her and compelled her to rise and speak, because the Bible states... "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence" (1st Timothy 2:12). Catherine Booth, as many rebellious woman today like Melissa Scott, have twisted the Scriptures in an attempt to justify their rebellion. God calls men to preach, NOT women.

Catherine's sermon was so impressive that William changed his mind about women's preachers.

NOTE: This is a bad reflection on William Booth. He compromised his beliefs to appease the wicked.

Catherine soon developed a reputation as an outstanding speaker but many Christians were outraged by the idea.

NOTE: Christians should be outraged by women preachers, because they are ALL false prophets!

As Catherine pointed out at that time it was believed that a woman's place was in the home and "any respectable woman who raised her voice in public risked grave censure."

NOTE: Would to God that this were America today. America's feminism is responsible for massive pornography, child abuse, a skyrocketing divorce rate, 48000000 abortions, legalized prostitution, etc. Feminism is of the Devil.

In 1864 the couple began in London's East End the Christian Mission which later developed into the Salvation Army. Catherine Booth took a leading role in these revival services and could often be seen preaching in the dockland parishes of Rotherhithe and Bermondsey. Though often imprisoned for preaching in the open air, members of the Salvation Army fought on, waging war on poverty and injustice.

The Church of England were at first extremely hostile to the Salvation Army. Lord Shaftesbury, a leading politician and evangelist, described William Booth as the "antichrist". One of the main complaints against William Booth was his "elevation of women to man's status."

NOTE: When God's people commit sin, it gives the sinful world ammunition to legitimately attack us. I receive hundreds of e-mails from people, who point out the hypocrisies of professed Christians today, such as praising George W. Bush as a man of God, when in reality he is a follower of Satan. Catherine Booth was a rebel. Feminism is not about women's rights; but rather, about women rebelling against an authoritative husband, pastor, or God. Feminists resent masculine authority.

In the Salvation Army a woman officer enjoyed equal rights with a man. Although William Booth had initially rejected the idea of women preachers, he had now completely changed his mind and wrote that "the best men in my Army are the women."

NOTE: Women have equal human rights, are of equal worth, and are not inferior to men in any way; BUT, woman do not have a right to usurp authority over men. Feminism DEMANDS equality in the area of authority, and cries "inequality" if they don't get it. This is what Lucifer said in Isaiah 14:14... "I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High." Lucifer just wanted EQUALITY, wanting to be "like" the most high. Feminists claim they are simply asking for equality, to be "like" men in authority. Today, America is infested with women in authoritative power positions, and America is going to Hell because of it. Homosexuality is commonplace, abortion has become completely shameless, pornography is considered normal, divorce is highly encouraged nowadays, etc. Sin! Sin! Sin! Feminism is a Trojan Horse sin, that brings with it a slew of godlessness and woeful evils. Feminism and the Word of God are DIAMETRICALLY opposed to each other!

Catherine began to organize what became known as Food-for-the-Million Shops where the poor could buy hot soup and a three-course dinner for sixpence. On special occasions such as Christmas Day, Catherine Booth would cook over 300 dinners to be distributed to the poor of London.

NOTE: Oprah Winfrey has donated millions to the poor, but is also the biggest propagator of New Age damnable heresy in the world today. Millions of people are going to burn in the fires of Hell one day because of Oprah Winfrey. Oprah has openly denied Jesus Christ (John 14:6). Oprah will be cast into the lake of Fire. Likewise, the Salvation Army does much good today, as far as helping the needy, but what does it profit a man if he gain the whole world, but lose his own soul? What good is it to help the needy, if they are going to burn in Hell when they die because we fail to preach the Gospel to them? The Salvation Army is more army than salvation.

By 1882 a survey of London discovered that on one weeknight, there were almost 17,000 worshipping with the Salvation Army, compared to 11,000 in ordinary churches. Even, Dr. William Thornton, the Archbishop of York, had to accept that the Salvation Army was reaching people that the Church of England had failed to have any impact on.

It was while working with the poor in London that Catherine found out about what was known as "sweated labour". That is, women and children working long hours for low wages in very poor conditions. In the tenements of London, Catherine discovered red-eyed women hemming and stitching for eleven hours a day. These women were only paid 9d. a day, whereas men doing the same work in a factory were receiving over 3s. 6d. Catherine and fellow members of the Salvation Army attempted to shame employers into paying better wages. They also attempted to improve the working conditions of these women.

NOTE: Some of societies biggest phonies, Modernists, and Christ-rejecters are also the biggest social reformers. One such imposter was Martin Luther King Jr.,--a Christ-rejecting, Communist, womanizing, who denied the Virgin Birth and the Deity of Jesus. Catherine Booth was another social reformer, an avowed feminist, and a false prophet (which all women preachers are).

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 25 Comments [2/16/2017 7:58:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 122380

[ From an article that talks to women regarding whether they still intend to vote for Trump after the groping scandal(s) ]

Debbie Eberly
Then: Trump | Now: Trump

I settled on Trump at the beginning of the primary. I felt he was taking on the Establishment, which has grown very corrupt. I didn’t have a problem with the Birther issue. Frankly, I was proud that he did that. And I’m not going to look at something he said 11 years ago. Otherwise, they’d have to look at their own locker-room talk, and really, there’s a finger pointing back at themselves. We’ve taken quite a bit of time to pray for him. We believe that Trump has made some recent changes, growing stronger in his own Christian beliefs and putting Christian people around him. As a woman advocate, I still have no sympathy for Hillary Clinton. I’m sure if a woman were a godly person, I could be proud of that. But I would never be proud of Hillary. Unless she totally recanted, repented — and frankly, if she did that, she would reveal what’s she’s done, and she’d be in prison. She has a very dark side. I think Trump put it in good words, I just recently read, about a dark soul.

Debbie Eberly, NYmag.com 104 Comments [11/8/2016 2:46:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: KittyKaboom

Quote# 29092

I don’t think the question is whether Jesus is violent or peaceful, or whether Allah is violent or peaceful. The question is whether Christians are commanded to be violent or not, and I think we all know the answer...

The Great Commandments are to love your neighbor as yourself and love the Lord with all our heart, mind, soul and strength. I wish there were more Christian extremists, who take the words of Jesus literally, and act them out on a daily basis.

However, no one hopes for more Muslim extremists. No one hopes for more Muslims to take the Koran literally.

Thanks,
Bill

p.s. Jesus has the right to be violent, because the universe is His posession, and He can do with it as He wishes, including killing people, and sending them to hell.

BillPhillips, http://sanctification,wordpress.com 35 Comments [9/19/2007 4:32:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: WhoreChurch.Wordpress.com

Quote# 15140

Does anyone ever get a type of discernment with music? When you hear a song, have no clue who it is, listen to the words, they don't seem bad at all but yet have this battle inside you knowing it is not good....a horrible feeling that just won't go away.

I have had that a few times and once it was with that Cobain guy.
I had no clue who he was, my kids didn't listen to him and I only listen to Christian music. My rule when they were young was they can listen to secular but not if it has bad stuff in it...like all full of cuss words, talking all about sex or devil stuff...My personal opinion so no need for debate

Her cousin came over once and had that Kurt cobain guy's music. They were playing it and the song they were playing had nothing bad in it. In fact, it was a pretty song, not that heavy metal stuff. But as I was cleaning, they had it up loud, I got the worse feeling inside me. As if something that was not of God was there and a battle was going on. I listen to the words of the song but found nothing wrong with it. I didn't want to tell them to turn it off since I had no reason too.
But, it got so strong I finally went in there and told them..." I am so sorry but something is wrong with that song...I can't even tell you why but I really feel like something is wrong and the Holy Spirit is making me feel something isn't right.
Her cousin's face went white, and said, This is Kurt Cobain. I said, "who is that?". She said he killed himself yesterday...then she said that she had heard that he was into satanism some how.
They didn't get upset with me at all that I told them to turn it off. After she told me I said..."Wow, must be why God didn't like it much"
She then broke the tape and threw it away...LOL I didn't have to say a word, it was as if they knew as well..

Caligirl, Rapture Ready 35 Comments [9/19/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Nickstr5

Quote# 136091

How I Feel In Modern America

As much as it pains me to cover parts of a painting dating back to the War Between the States, the message is clear.

(Image: a Civil War-era painting of a Confederate soldier hiding behind a tree, with Union forces advancing from the background bearing an American flag. The Confederate soldier has the Confederate flag edited onto him and the word "@confederatetruth" written above his head, while the Union soldiers similarly sport the Coexist logo, the LGBT pride flag, the hammer and sickle, the logo of the Antifa movement, the logo of CNN, the Democrat donkey and a Black Lives Matter icon.)

OddGarfield, deviantArt 29 Comments [1/18/2018 5:23:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 136115


[what would you doif your friend admitted he is a serial killer ]



Get a lot of detail from them, look at the papers/online to see if it's true, and see if there's any reward offered.

If there's a reward, I'll do my civic duty and report them with name and details to the cops. I'll take the reward money! That, and in my state, there is no death sentence, so I can visit them in prison.

If there's no reward, let them continue and play dumb to the cops - just make them promise not to kill people I'm dating, friends, and/or my family members.

RandomCashier75 , reddit 17 Comments [1/18/2018 11:50:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 136067

[From "These Bitches are Fucking Dogs Now"]

There is an epidemic of White girl dog-fucking that has gone largely unnoticed and unreported by the mainstream media.

But occasionally we get a glimpse into the underground world of dog fucking with stories like this.

A woman in Scotland who shot cellphone video of herself in a sex act involving her pet dog and whipped cream has pleaded guilty to two counts of possessing pornography.

[...]


The poor dog.

White women have become such fat whores that no decent man wants them. As a result, many are resorting to dog-fucking to get their fix of sexual attention. Animal rights organizations like PETA have remained completely silent on this shocking trend of abuse.

Shame on them.

The problem is hard to accurately calculate because these thots are keeping it going on the down low. Just like all those teachers secretely fucking their students, lots of these thots are doing the same with the pets that have been entrusted to them.

And they use a secret code to communicate that they are in the market, looking for dogs to bang.

But it can be cracked.

Whenever you see a girl using the dog filter on snap chat, it’s actually a code signal.

It means, “I’m looking to fuck dogs.”

In general, a good rule of thumb is that any single woman with a large dog is actually probably fucking the poor thing.

There’s no other reason for a woman to want a large male dog as a companion otherwise. Only men take an interest in dogs like that because they’re cool, fun to play with, great protection and our best friends…not our fuck buddies.

Be careful out there, Stormers.

Without White Sharia, these women are literally going crazy. We already knew they were capable of fucking animals when they started fucking niggers, but this is a new low…or an improvement, I’m not sure.

At least dogs are loyal, serve a function in society and are good around children.

Not sure what niggers have going for them when compared to niggers now that I think about it. Regardless, we opened the doors to all this madness when we repealed White Sharia and allowed mixed-race relationships.

It was only a small step to bestiality from there.

We need to do something though. Think of the poor doggos out there forced to copulate with these disgusting women.

Roy Batty, Daily Stormer 16 Comments [1/17/2018 4:00:23 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 136083

Are you a Democrat or Republican?
Anyone over the age of 25 who labels themselves w/meaningless terms like "democrat," "republican," "liberal," "con-servative," etc. are clearly watching too much Culpritic media, aren't very bright, or both.

All sides are run by the same people -- they run nearly everything worldwide. What you want doesn't matter. This has been true for many, many decades. Are you really too stupid to recognize these facts?

Your fucktarded football-team mentality is what your brain looks like after its been thoroughly pickled in talmudipoop. Once you get yer brain out of the ole Culpritic brine for a while, you may start to be able to think straight again.

I imbibe the Culpritic media & I’m not brainwashed.
You are worse than brainwashed. You are addicted to yidcum, but you'll keep swearing that you're not.

You're the type of insufferable fucktard who "believes" that smoking doesn't cause lung cancer -- because you're too weak to quit.

Chide yourself if you do any of the following:
- talk on your cell phone in public places
- text, or use textglish (U no wha I meen)
- tweet hipster yidcum
- use sheepbook
- watch more than 1 hr. per month of
Heebtoob, including (& especially)
Joolywood movies
- have been married more than once

Kill yourself if you do any of the following:
- are a shyster or business criminal
- watch more than 10 hr. per month of
Heebtoob, including (& especially)
Joolywood movies
- beat off to pornography
- are a racemixing "white" nationalist
(because of your flagrant hypocrisy,
not because of your intractable pecker)
- have been married more than twice
- are waiting for Sheeny in the Sky to
come back to further instruct you
on how to be a worthless pussy

What are “business criminals?”
Most people think of Wall St. & other wemiddlemanthegoyim types, but in reality, "business criminal" is by far the most pervasive "occupational" sector in Amerika.

Just about everyone who works for corporations are business criminals.

Most people who work for the government are business criminals (especially those who misrepresent themselves w/titles they didn't earn, like many grossly-undereducated educrats do). Nearly 100% of "your" reps are not only business criminals, they're shysters as well.

Many "self-employed" are business criminals (i.e. real estate agents, sales reps, building inspectors, etc.). Anyone describing their "work" using the words "marketing" "advertising" "sales" or "therapist" is a business criminal (the latter isn't a protected term, so any Shite-fer-Brains can use it.) This excludes anyone who doesn't charge you for services (e.g. I'm a "reality therapist.")

Marina Orwell, Orwell's Daughter 15 Comments [1/17/2018 11:47:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 10

Quote# 136110

(He's talking about gay people and gay marriage)

Thats all well and good, but in 20 years time all the sods will have died out due to lack of reproduction. Non-muslims in general are rapidly becoming a minority due to low birth rates. Muslims will be the majority by then, easily.

Theres no point looking at everything negatively - what ever they plan always backfires on them and turns out best for us both ways.

aadil77, Ummah 14 Comments [1/18/2018 11:43:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136016

Principles of Reactionary Thought

1. People are not equal. They never will be. We reject equality in all its forms.
2. Right is right and left is wrong.
3. Hierarchy is basically a good idea.
4. Traditional sex roles are basically a good idea.
5. Libertarianism is retarded.
6. Democracy is irredeemably flawed and we need to do away with it.


______

1. People are not equal. They never will be. We reject equality in all its forms.

This is the most basic tenet of Neoreaction/Reaction. Equality is a lie. Neoreaction and Reactionary thought are fundamentally opposed to it. Aristotle said, “The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” The idea of equality ruins organic differentiation and makes humanity into a uniform, grey mass. Inequality does not necessarily mean “superior” or “inferior” (though it very well may), but it does mean different. Things which are different are not equal. They can never be. Equality is a failed ideal. It destroys excellence. We could not be more fundamentally opposed to the notion of equality. Evola was extremely clear on rejecting equality in favor of authority and auctoritas. In Men Among the Ruins, he said:
Let us begin with the egalitarian premise. It is necessary to state from the outset that the “immortal principle” of equality is sheer nonsense. There is no need to comment on the inequality of human beings from a naturalistic point of view. And yet the champions of egalitarianism make equality a matter of principle, claiming that while human beings are not equal de facto, they are so de jure: they are unequal, and yet they should not be. [...]
I believe these are mere empty words. This is not a “noble ideal” but some-thing that, if taken absolutely, represents a logical absurdity; wherever this view becomes an established trend, it may usher in only regression and decadence. [...]
From both perspectives, it is rationally well established that the “many” not only cannot be equal, but they also must not be equal: inequality is true de facto only because it is true de jure and it is real only because it is necessary. That which the egalitarian ideology wished to portray as a state of “justice” is in reality a state of injustice, according to a perspective that is higher and beyond the humanitarian and democratic rhetorics. In the past, Cicero and Aristotle argued along these lines. Conversely, to posit inequality means to transcend quantity and admit quality. It is here that the two notions of the individual and the person are differentiated.

If Reaction/Neoreaction is against anything, it is against equality. If someone argues for equality, they are not a reactionary/neoreactionary, but something else.

2. Right is right and left is wrong.

To reactionaries, this is axiomatic. The phrase was popularized by Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddhin, who along with Carlyle and Evola, is part of the central canon of neoreactionary thought. If someone disagrees with this phrase, they may be a perfectly delightful person, someone I’d enjoy having tea with, but they would not be a reactionary. Moldbug cites this phrase in his “Journey from Mises to Carlyle” post. In “A Gentle Introduction to Unqualified Reservations,” he says:
On the other hand, it is also quite easy to construct a very clean value system in which order is simply good, and chaos is simply evil. I have chosen this path. It leaves quite a capacious cavity in the back of my skull, and allows me to call myself a reactionary. To you, perhaps, it is the dark side. But this is only because the treatment is not yet complete.

Again, basic stuff. He also writes:
The left is chaos and anarchy, and the more anarchy you have, the more power there is to go around. The more orderly a system is, the fewer people get to issue orders. The same asymmetry is why corporations and the military, whose system of hierarchical executive authority is inherently orderly, cluster to the right.


3. Hierarchy is basically a good idea.
In general, hierarchy promotes stability, order, direction, cohesion, and so on. Reactionaries object to the rigid hierarchies of totalitarianism, which turn men into cogs in a machine. (See Fascism Viewed from the Right by Julius Evola for a reactionary critique of fascism, or chapter four of Men Among the Ruins.) If you have trouble distinguishing reactionary thought from fascism, you must read chapter four of Men Among the Ruins, or you will never get it. Rather than advocating rigid hierarchies that crush human autonomy, reactionaries support the “organic State,” which Evola describes:
Every society and State is made of people; individual human beings are their primary element. What kind of human beings? Not people as they are conceived by individualism, as atoms or a mass of atoms, but people as persons, as differentiated beings, each one endowed with a different rank, a different freedom, a different right within the social hierarchy based on the values of creating, constructing, obeying, and commanding. With people such as these it is possible to establish the true State, namely an antiliberal, antidemocratic, and organic State. The idea behind such a State is the priority of the person over any abstract social, political, or juridical entity, and not of the person as a neuter, leveled reality, a mere number in the world of quantity and universal suffrage.

The goal of the organic State is to foster “a process of individuation and of progressive differentiation” of persons, rather than a universalist, leveling aesthetic. Some people are natural leaders, others are not. This is not about all reactionaries fantasizing ourselves to be natural leaders, destined for a spot up the totem poll Come the Revolution. The idea is creating a society that offers a pleasant differentiation and individuation from top to bottom. There are reasons why this actually makes being at the bottom a better and more interesting experience than it is now, but that’s a whole ‘nother topic.

4. Traditional sex roles are basically a good idea.

It’s tiresome to go into this one, since the feminists are so rabid about it, but reactionaries basically approve of traditional sex roles. In traditional societies, women did in fact take on some jobs and roles that might be considered careers by today’s standards. They were not all stay-at-home wives, and even if they were, many were extremely industrious. I’m not sure why staying at home, making clothing, cooking, gardening, and raising children is any less empowering or worthwhile than male activities like digging ditches, welding, or sitting at an office desk on a computer all day.

Conversely, if a man chooses to stay home and raise children, many other men will think less of him. No amount of progressive propaganda and reeducation camps will change this, because it’s hard-coded into our brains through millions of years of evolution. Men respect other men who go out into the world and do masculine things. Similarly, the pressure to conform to gender norms is stronger in all-girl schools than in mixed schools, exploding the myth that it is men who instigate and police gender norms, to the detriment of women. People can and do create bizarro-world bubbles where these roles are turned upside-down, but they are not very stable.

Women are less happy today than they were 40 years ago, despite all the alleged advances made by feminism during that time. One reactionary woman I’ve spoken with has said that feminism is fundamentally dishonest because it is a movement for women without children, while it portraying itself as helpful to all women. Another woman says, “I would prefer that norms strongly support functional families and that anyone who wants to do something else has to swim upstream”, which is a fair summation of the reactionary position.

5. Libertarianism is retarded.

Many reactionaries are post-libertarians, i.e., not libertarians. A rite of passage into reaction/neoreaction is the renunciation of libertarianism. I was never a libertarian, so it’s taken me a bit of time to fully understand the relationship between libertarianism and neoreaction, but I understand it now. Libertarians make personal freedom axiomatic, and refuse to consider the negative externalities of that freedom to traditional structures like society and the family. This is anathema to reactionaries.

Neoreaction has a close relationship with traditionalism, which upholds social obligations, norms, some degree of group conformity/homogeneity, and so on. Neoreaction has libertarian qualities, such as advocating for a smaller government and the exclusion of government from traditionally private spheres, but rejects libertarianism overall.

Libertarianism, if it could work at all, would only be suitable for a portion of the population, maybe 15-20%, who are willing to go Galt and lock themselves in a metaphorical fortress against the world. If a libertarian society would leave many out in the cold, libertarians seem not to care. Meanwhile, reactionaries foster community, family, and social cohesion. A couple months ago, I stated, “The “socialism” that traditionalism advocates is family and friends helping each other of their own free will.” That sums up the reactionary position on mutual assistance, which is theoretically compatible with libertarianism, but is not compatible with the mood and spirit of libertarianism as it is in fact lived and practiced. Also, reactionaries tend to view libertarians as excessively materialistic.

For a final tidbit of food for thought on this one, someone on Twitter said, “if you took libertarianism but made the basic social unit the family rather than the individual you would come close to what neoreaction is”. Debatable, but interesting.

6. Democracy is irredeemably flawed and we need to do away with it.

Democracy has been a disaster. Read Democracy: the God That Failed for an explanation. If you have not read at least some of this book, you will be lost. At the very least, reading some of it will give you exposure to serious academic discourse on the failure of democracy. Dismissing anything anti-democratic as “fascism” simply marks you as an idiot, a man of no intellectual depth. At least people like Scott Alexander are capable of going a little deeper and providing a defense of democracy that avoids relying on the fascist boogeyman.

That’s it.

I considered including “opposition to the Cathedral,” here, but decided to leave it out since “Cathedral” is just a lame neologism to outsiders, and I want my posts to be digestible by normal people with no prior exposure to reactionary thought. Also, the question of what the Cathedral is, exactly, is a very complicated one.

I limit the premises to six because I want them to be definitional and exhaustive — anyone who does agree with all six of these premises is almost certainly a reactionary, or at least on the Far Right, while anyone who disagrees with any one of them is almost certainly not a reactionary. We have to draw the line somewhere. Having in-groups and out-groups is another premise of reactionary thought.

(Emphasis original)

Michael Anissimov, More Right (via archive.is) 16 Comments [1/16/2018 12:13:20 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136136

(And more tales of co!minion wafers)

I did hear of a prison vicar who noted a quite different reaction and reception to himself from the inmate body when he went with communion wafers and when he never and decided to experiment with hidden wafers.

Private Frazer, Religion and Ethics 11 Comments [1/20/2018 12:46:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: NearlySane

Quote# 14809

"Recently a strongly antiabortion Southern Baptist woman sat across from me in a counseling room and said, "I'm not like all those other women out there in your waiting room." She said that, unlike all our other patients, she had "no other choice."

The reason that her abortion was morally permissible? Because she and her lover were married, but (in the words of an old C&W standard) not to each other."

I still wonder whether she still would have seen herself as uniquely special had she known that among the \"other women\" on that day were a 15 year-old rape survivor, and a young single mother of two children whose cancer treatment could not be continued while she remained pregnant.

But it has been my experience that the answer very likely would have been "yes."

Unknown, Talk to action 28 Comments [9/11/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: Archangel_Lucifer

Quote# 136059

[This is in reference to the murder of two lesbians and their child by a transwoman known as Dana Rivers.]



Anonymous, Twitter 13 Comments [1/19/2018 1:40:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 136111

(She's talking about gay people being killed)

Because it's not murder, it's capital punishment. I advocate all laws of Allah because He is the Creator and He says to do it. Muslims are the slaves of Allah and do as He says. Anyone who doesn't is the enemy of Allah.

Sister, Ummah 13 Comments [1/18/2018 11:43:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136086

I've been trying to produce an appropriate alternative for LGBT that may be useful in some secular contexts, especially in online forums. It could be useful to help stimulate debate or even just a helpful way to speak the truth.

The best I have so far is:
Lascivious
Gross
Brazen
Turpitude
I've also seen "Lettuce, Gherkin, Bacon and Tomato" posted by someone online.

Please help by posting any useful suggestions that we might all be able to use. I think both truth and humour have their uses in the right circumstances.

[Other letters are used as well, such as LGBTQI, but I believe that it's best to stick with LGBT only. In particular, the "I" needs to be avoided as this relates to "Intersex", which unfortunately is a genuine medical condition and not a lifestyle choice.]


Simon, Rapture Forums 18 Comments [1/17/2018 11:48:03 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 136117

"And that is the whole point of SPLC. To direct the violent works of their fellow travelers. Much in the same way that groups like the Muslim Brotherhood are connected to terror organizations , it do not engage in such activities themselves."

"Discredited by whom? LGBT activists and their allies? The SPLC? Reading your posts, you sound like a propagandist. Which is typical of of a progressive. You believe in 'diversity', as long as it's a diversity of your ideas. Anything else is 'discredited', or 'hate soeech'.

Sorry, you're selling, but we're not buying."

"There is nothing credible about a far left fringe organization like the SPLC."

"The SPLC attempts to shut down any speech with which they disagree. An effort with which you agree. Typical progressive."

"It won't matter soon. There will be a cure for homosexuality within twenty years."

"Lots of progtarded twisted reasons to infringe on our rights."

"More of your hateful leftist lies. You're just another progressive propagandist."

"Like pretty much everything you've had to say. You're clearly a totalitarian at heart. I have no doubt you would force soeech codes based on your sensibilities on this country if you could. Criminalizing even the slightest criticism of homosexuality."

"SPLC is definitely an anti first amendment hate group."

"You're calling Stossel and asshole? Only a piece of shit would do that."

"If you want to see a bigot, you need only turn to your nearest mirror"

Elias Fakaname, Reason 11 Comments [1/19/2018 4:22:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Shakesmyhead

Quote# 135493

(This fundie is talking about Satanic Ritual Abuse)

Y’all aren’t even worthy of a response. Been through all that, been to dozens of funerals of occult victims, Counseled hundreds, and have seen more crime scene photos than anyone should have to see in a lifetime.

So sick of people hiding behind the ridiculous “it’s all satanic panic” bushwah Especially since none of them have seen any of it for real. Whatever helps you sleep at night I guess. Just stop talking like experts, you’re not.

Dr Gregory R Reid, Disqus 11 Comments [12/25/2017 6:51:33 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 54503

[when asked a series of questions about her completely illogical views on gay marriage]

1. I define marriage as the deep, lifelong, committal love between a man and a woman.
2. I've looked up the definition in the dictionary for marriage and have seen clearly what I stated above about a man and woman. I believe this to be the case just as much as it's impossible for a Christian to have a bar mitzvah, it's a Jewish initiation.
3. My personal experience with homosexuals has been bad. I was part of a group of them that were very promiscuous and they teased for being a goody two shoes to the point where I ran away either to end my life or finally have sex,(I was slow to develop physically and by that time I had no self esteem.) I've been in treatment for the last two years and have run into more types of people than a average person would in a lifetime. When I think of homosexuals I think of promiscuity.
4.Yes, it has to do with my beliefs, but that is not all of it. I'm not using God's commands as evidence, I'm debating my belief. An argument is an argument no matter what background the person comes from.

skinnybrunette20, gURL.com 50 Comments [12/19/2008 6:36:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 136064

The Holy Scriptures warn that if we big Godspeed, that is, show any support or sanction, toward those who teach false doctrine, we are partakers of their evil deeds. The greatest assault against the doctrine of Christ today is coming from the Alexandrian manuscripts (upon which the modern corrupt Bible versions are all based). For example: All of the new Bible perversions remove Acts 8:37 completely, which says that Jesus is “the Son of God.” All of the modern Bible perversions corrupt the doctrine of Christ by removing the word “begotten” from the Bible.

One of the biggest problems today is shameful pastors who have a tolerance for evil. Few pastors hate evil as much as they ought. Psalms 97:10, “Ye that love the LORD, hate evil.” I hate evil. I hate it so much that I want to warn everybody I can about the Devil's counterfeit Bible versions. Unfortunately, I keep meeting ungodly pastors, who don't love the Lord as they ought, and have a tolerance for evil things; such as, the Alexandrian Bible perversions.

I knew one pastor, a disgrace to his profession, who superficially claims to be King James Bible only, while at the same time openly supporting and associating with other local churches that use, sell and promote the Alexandrian perversions. Folks, that is evil! He is bidding Godspeed to evildoers, wicked servants, who shall be punished. Proverbs 19:5, “A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.” Even if you use only the King James, if you buddy-buddy with ungodly pastors who use, sell and promote the modern perversions, you have that same blood on your hands, because you are encouraging them.

The Scriptures forbid even eating a meal with a fellow believer who lives in open sin. 1st Corinthians 5:11, “But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.” So let me ask you a question, which is worse—fornicating, getting drunk, being a critic, covetousness, extortion—or corrupting God's words? My friend, there is no comparison. Tampering with God's Word is infinitely more evil.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 14 Comments [1/17/2018 3:58:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 98447

from a post titled "Proof of creation no atheist can debunk (100% bulletproof)"

The Intelligent design of our universe is geometrical and congruent forming beautiful shapes and images with the number 9 as a proof of concept stamp on it given by God. From atoms to galaxies and even our DNA is surrounded by geometrical shapes and patterns with the number 9 hidden inside as proof of creation.

Numbers form shapes and do very weird things according to magnetism. When you add numbers a certain way, different patterns arise which create geometrical shapes. It seems that the construction of our universe, galaxy, and solar system revolves around the number 9 somehow and this number comes up everywhere just as a woman is pregnant for 9 months displaying the 9 code.

The number 9 seems to govern not only properties of physical reality but also time:

Using the digital root method:

1,440 minutes in a day = adds up to 9
86,400 seconds in a day = adds up to 9
10,080 minutes in a week = adds up to 9
525,600 minutes in a year = adds up to 9

Minutes and seconds in a day, week, month, year will always reduce to 9. Totally unaffected by the varying number of days in months and years i.E "leap years".

The number 9 seems to govern time and space, it also seems to be existent and non existent at the same time.

insider432, Atheist Forums 67 Comments [12/26/2013 5:47:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 31
Submitted By: Doubting Thomas

Quote# 136085

Porn for White Women
Sorry to disappoint porn-addled males who clicked here to make their 1.5 oz. of weakling flesh hard. See The Cure for Porn Addiction

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not surprisingly, what turns on White women is justice — and boy, after centuries of putting up with y’all’s abuse, have we been saving up a lot of it ;o)
All rapists: Castration (of both turkey neck & gizzards). They will then be publicly raped every day for a year; these will be shown on pay-per-view. Rapists participating in gang rape (e.g. “white” frat boys, roaming troops of semi-human blacks, hate-filled little amerind fags, ALL of the jew boys who perpetrate rape via their vile pornography) will be publicly gang-raped for several hours each day — by each other. After a year of this, their turkey neck n’ gizzards will be publically removed & they will be tortured until death.
Home terrorists (AKA those violent apes who commit domestic violence): daily public scourging — also on pay per view.
No, White female taxpayers will no longer pay for the upkeep of male animals in “prisons.” Male animals will be penned up & will have to forage for themselves — until “showtime,” that is ;o)

Marina Orwell, Orwell's Daughter 10 Comments [1/17/2018 11:47:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 136097

Lady Checkmate's headline: "Florida psychiatrist suing Reddit over negative reviews about his practice"

(Fox News cut-and-paste: www.foxnews.com/us/2018/01/18/florida-psychiatrist-suing-reddit-over-negative-reviews-about-his-practice.html)

Lady Checkmate:
hmmm...on one hand I agree with free speech, but on the other hand trolls don't deserve anything; especially, when they use multiple sock accounts (to pretend to be multiple people) to target and harass others with the sole purpose of trying to hurt them in some way (loss of business, capital, customers/clients or support). He has a right to sue every troll (utilizing sock accounts) he can and he should AND hopefully he'll win.

Baldric:
If you have a problem with the Doctor they have medical boards to file complaints with.

Lady Checkmate:
Exactly! Anything else is just plain old trolling...probably done by one clown utilizing multiple sock accounts, I.e, a pathetic loser.


Lady Checkmate, Disqus - News Network 13 Comments [1/18/2018 10:27:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Jocasta