1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | bottom
Quote# 140854

I believe if we study history — you know, the Confederates were able to shoot pterodactyls. You know, back in the Civil War. And they spread these things out. Anybody can look it up online. They spread these things out, and… this is a historical fact. So, you know, they spread this thing out and it’s got huge wing-length. It’s a pterodactyl they shot! So of course these things have been around. Now they went extinct, obviously. Slowly but surely. And so I don’t believe that just because… at some point in time, coming from your perspective, that… just because they stopped talking about it means that they never saw it. When we have all this evidence that they’ve seen it.

Matt Powell, Patheos 20 Comments [10/12/2018 6:17:50 PM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 140897

[Re. Jesse McCartney]

I'm sick and tired of people asking whether gays are gays. If a male wears lip stick, looks gay, acts gay, sings gay and says he welcomes gay fans... he's gay!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 22 Comments [10/13/2018 8:38:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 140904

More whining by Muslims. They are always the victims even when engaging in terrorism. The truth is that Muslims engage in terrorism because the Koran commands it.

The British are brain dead. No wonder they tolerated the rapes of many thousands of British girls by Muslim men. They didn’t even have the courage to refer to the rapists as Pakistani Muslims, instead dishonestly referring to them as Asians

Terry Gain, Jihadwatch 11 Comments [10/13/2018 8:47:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140910

Fraud: A deception deliberately practiced in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain. The climate change dogma is defrauding taxpayers around the World of $trillions. Anyone who propagates human induced climate change con/scam, supports it or campaigns to bring it about should be arrested and charged with fraud.

Gbees, Watt's Up With That 8 Comments [10/14/2018 10:37:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140911

Communists and Muslims slaughtering each other, however, is a big help for BOTH Communism and Islam.

A complete solution it is not, but only because in the end some of one or the other will be left and of course there will still be work to do.

But that is the only reason.

MrEdd, Free Republic 9 Comments [10/14/2018 10:38:31 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140912

Alfred Kinsey was a pervert and a sex criminal

He is known as “The Father of the Sexual Revolution,” and if you’ve ever taken a university course on 20th century history, you’ll have heard his name: Alfred Kinsey.

Kinsey was not only the “father” of the Sexual Revolution, he set the stage for the massive social and cultural upheaval of the ‘60s, ‘70s and ‘80s with his 1948 Sexual Behavior in the Human Maleand his 1953 Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.

These books revealed to a shocked and somewhat titillated population things they had never known about themselves: That between 30-45% of men had affairs, 85% of men had had sex prior to marriage, that a staggering 70% of men had slept with prostitutes, and that between 10 and 37% of men had engaged in homosexual behavior.

Much less talked about were his other disturbing “findings”—an in-depth study on the “sexual behavior” of children, as well as claims that nearly 10% of men had performed sex acts with animals (as well as 3.6% of women), and that this number rose to between 40-50% based on proximity to farms

Kinsey’s research portrayed people as amoral and sex-driven, and is credited as fundamentally changing the way our culture views sex.

But was he right?

To begin with, the integrity of much of his work has long since been called into question: among his questionable practices, Kinsey encouraged those he was working with to engage in all types of sexual activity as a form of research, misrepresented single people as married, and hugely over represented incarcerated sex criminals and prostitutes in his data.

But beyond this is the simple fact that Kinsey himself was a pervert and a sex criminal.

For example, where did he get all of his data on the “sexual behavior of children”? The answer is nothing short of chilling. Dr. Judith Reisman (whose research has since been confirmed time and time again) explained in her ground-breaking work Sex, Lies and Kinsey that Kinsey facilitated brutal sexual abuse to get his so-called research: "Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal “child sexuality.” Many of the crimes against children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed for Kinsey’s research are quantified in his own graphs and charts. For example, “Table 34” on page 180 of Kinsey’s “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” claims to be a “scientific” record of “multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.” Here, infants as young as five months were timed with a stopwatch for “orgasm” by Kinsey’s “technically trained” aides, with one four-year-old tested 24 consecutive hours for an alleged 26 “orgasms.” Sex educators, pedophiles and their advocates commonly quote these child “data” to prove children’s need for homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual satisfaction via “safe-sex” education. These data are also regularly used to “prove” children are sexual from birth."

The man heralded with enthusiasm by mainstream publications such as Timeand Life Magazine was nothing less than a monstrous facilitator of child-rape. In fact, he even went so far as to record children shrieking and thrashing in pain, passing out and convulsing as the result of the hellish abuse he was putting them through, as evidence of “orgasm”—especially for children who could not yet speak.

Kinsey’s so-called research was simply a quest to justify the fact that he himself was a deeply disturbed man. Dr. Reisman writes, “Both of Kinsey’s most recent admiring biographers confessed he was a sadistic bi/homosexual, who seduced his male students and coerced his wife, his staff and the staff’s wives to perform for and with him in illegal pornographic films made in the family attic. Kinsey and his mates, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin and Paul Gebhard, had ‘front’ Marriages that concealed their strategies to supplant what they say as a narrow pro-creational Judeo-Christian era with a promiscuous ‘anything goes’ bi/gay pedophile paradise.”

Got that? The Father of the Sexual Revolution was a sado-masochistic bi-sexual sex criminal who facilitated the sexual torture of infants and children. His goal was not just to engage in scientific research in order to see where the data took him, but rather, as one of his prominent biographers Michael Jones notes, to launch a crusade to undermine traditional sexual morality. He did so to wild success—Kinsey’s influence on sex education and law in the Western world is absolutely staggering.

Some have claimed that even though Kinsey may have been disturbed and engaged in immoral behavior, his fundamental conclusions and his data still remain accurate. This, too, proves blatantly false. According to Dr. Reisman:

1. [Dr. Kinsey’s team] ‘forced’ subjects to give the desired answers to their sex questions, 2. Secretly trashed three quarters of their research data, and 3. Based their claims about normal males on a roughly 86 percent aberrant male population including 200 sexual psychopaths, 1,400 sex offenders and hundreds each of prisoners, male prostitutes and promiscuous homosexuals. Moreover, so few normal women would talk to them that the Kinsey team labeled women who lived over a year with a man ‘married,’ reclassifying data on prostitutes and other unconventional women as “Susie Homemaker.”
It is crucially important that people become aware of the truth behind the Kinsey Reports.

Today’s pornified sex educators, legal experts, academics, and more disturbingly, pedophile groups such as NAMBLA pushing “inter-generational intimacy,” all use Kinsey’s work to justify their agendas and lend their causes scientific credibility.

Most people have no idea who Alfred Kinsey really was and how his so-called research was actually performed. I myself first heard of Alfred Kinsey in the first year of my history degree at university, where my professor announced that there “was no Sexual Revolution at all”—because the Kinsey Reports proved that people had been engaging in all sorts of bizarre and criminal sexual behaviors all along.

The real story is horrifying. It is stomach-churning. But it is also crucial that we know how, exactly, we got to this place in our culture of such sexual nihilism.

Jonathan Van Maren, LifeSite News 9 Comments [10/14/2018 10:41:46 AM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 98873

People that Do Not Believe in God - Do Not have any Love in their lives! So their lives are one where they always think of themselves first! That is why If they marry, the marriage dose not last long..... They are not thinking of the other(s). So much is missed!

geessewereabove, Yahoo Answers 38 Comments [1/21/2014 4:03:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 140968

(commenting on story "Man Who Identifies as Woman Wins World Championship in Women's Cycling, 'It's Not Fair' Says Female Competitor"):

Amos Moses:
it still mystifies me .... how women .... who fought so hard to be able to have their own events and standing ..... are now allowing MEN to claim to be women ..... and are being allowed to destroy what they built ..... many "feminists" who again argue they are being "oppressed" by the patriarchy ..... are allowing the faux-women to destroy what they say they are opposed to ..... and it is all in the name of "tolerance" ......

what it really boils down to is this ..... this is a hatred of women ..... it is a hatred of masculinity .... it is a rejection of all truth ..... it is a rejection of science and biology .....it is a rejection of any rational thought ..... and all that was abandoned by the proponents of homomirage ..... and everyday we are seeing just how far that MIRAGE is affecting society in general ..... if you reject the foundations on which rests all that we have .... where is there for you to stand ..........

homomirage is the gaping wound in society ..... all the rest are the pus and gangrene that the infection of that wound is spilling out of .........

Burt Toast:
No, once again you are bringing same-sex marriage into a story where that is not even mentioned. It's unrelated, there is no causal effect, and you're being very dishonest.

Amos Moses, Christian News Network 8 Comments [10/18/2018 5:54:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 140739

“After All This … There’s Still More!”

God the Father will not permit us to pursue intimacy with Him before we gain intimacy with Jesus. Jesus Himself has won this place of intimacy with God the Father, and the Father commands us to believe, receive, and love His Son before coming to Him. The Father was so pleased that Jesus pursued intimacy with the Father and obeyed His will through suffering for all humankind. As a result, the Lord promoted Jesus to the highest place of intimacy in His kingdom. Our job is to pursue this intimacy with Jesus. As we gain this place of intimacy with Jesus, we automatically win what He has already won, including intimacy with His Father.

Now the Lord was introducing me to the intimacy with the Father before I realized it. I had fallen so deeply in love with Jesus that I didn’t know that there was another level of intimacy with the Godhead. The Lord told me that I had come to a place where I had loved Him at such a great level that it had touched His heart in a special way. He then said, “Now, I will reveal My Father to you. David, He is My greatest pursuit in life even now. This is My greatest prize and reward.” Then He said, with such loving tenderness in His voice, “Just Him.” I knew He was talking about the Father and winning an intimate relationship with Him in Person. He then continued, “I still pursue, follow, and obey My Father’s commands and desires today.” As Jesus stood in front of me I saw such regal, reverential honor and love for His Father. I also knew that the Father loved Him deeply, and I was about to see it firsthand.

David Taylor, My Trip to Heaven: Face to Face with Jesus 7 Comments [10/15/2018 7:53:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 140933

Chinese official says ‘sinicization’ of religion in Xinjiang must go on

You Quan, head of the ruling Communist Party’s United Front Work Department, which oversees ethnic and religious affairs, made the remark on a recent visit to Xinjiang

The “sinicization” of religion must be upheld to promote ethnic solidarity and religious harmony, a senior Chinese official has said in the troubled western region of Xinjiang, which is home to a large Muslim population.

China’s state-run Xinhua news agency on Saturday quoted You Quan, head of the ruling Communist Party’s United Front Work Department, which oversees ethnic and religious affairs, as making the remarks on a visit to Xinjiang this week.

“The Party’s leadership over religious work must be upheld,” You said, adding that “the infiltration of religious extremism must be guarded against”.

Xinhua said You expressed the hope “that people in religious circles can inherit and carry forward the fine traditions to love the motherland and their faith, lead religious believers to follow the right faith and abide by the law and contribute to the healthy development of Islam”.

You is a member of the influential secretariat of the party’s Central Committee.

You Quan, South China Morning Post 5 Comments [10/15/2018 8:03:51 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 140948

How will normies react once they realize what they have done?

And that women are literal communists who want to destroy democracy, and that immigration will actually introduce sharia dictatorship and destroy western civilization after all? Normie delusions can only last for so long. At some point the damage will be so great it won't be possible to pretend this isn't the case anymore. What do you think the normies will do once they realize this?

Disillusioned, incels.me 17 Comments [10/16/2018 1:21:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 140939

Truthfully, I fell in love with a woman that I met at Harvest in 2013-2014, which was my motivation for losing all my weight in February of 2017. I hadn't seen her for a long time, but thought about her a lot. I (by chance or God's intervention) met her one day at the beach, in her culottes in her hammock on February 21st, 2017, and finally expressed my heart's feelings toward her. I was on cloud nine. I was embarrassed when I met her, because she was so skinny, and I was so overweight. Unfortunately she doesn't want me (which makes me sad), likely afraid of what other people think about her (and me) at Harvest, since my fallout with Harvest Baptist Church. I know as sure as I'm saved that she liked me in 2014. She used to wait for me in the parking lot at the church, and she won my heart. But I was scared at the time (still recovering from a divorce), which I explained to her later. It is what it is, beyond my efforts. I wish things were different.

I really love Michael P. Bowen's book, “I Never Knew You,” where he is transparent (like I am being), sharing his many heartbreaks with the prospective women in his life, relating it to salvation and Matthew 7:21-23. Rejection hurts! I think it is tragic how so many women merely want the guy that everyone else wants (i.e., she is more concerned about her public image than finding a godly man). People marry for all the wrong reasons. I have my faults, but God knows there is not a more pure of heart man than myself, and I love the Lord Jesus Christ, which is why I fight so valiantly for the inspiration and purity of the King James Bible.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 15 Comments [10/16/2018 1:16:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 140932

I've progressed beyond the fallacy of favoring liberalism, simply because the old farts must be backwards dinosaurs. You begin with tolerance for gays, then extend it to trans, and then you move to all the other fetishes like pedophilia, beastiality, incest, and genetic engineering. Is there even a stopping point? I wonder if we are on a slippery slope and if it will inevitably meet a final backlash someday.


sesualaoi, E-Hentai Forums 18 Comments [10/15/2018 8:03:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: WarGoatHK417

Quote# 140926

Turkish Lira Crisis: “As for the one who disregards My message, he will have a miserable life”

The Turkish Lira hit a record low this week, and so far this year has lost 40% of its value against the dollar. In response Erdogan said, “They have got dollars, we have got our people, our right, our Allah.”

Erdogan was widely ridiculed for this statement. Yes, we do have Allah (Most High) but the solution to this crisis is not to pray to Allah while at the same time disobeying Him and implementing a riba (interest) based economic system with a fiat currency.


Allah (Most High) says,

“As for the one who disregards My message, he will have a miserable life, and we resurrect him, on the Day of resurrection, blind.”

(Ta Ha, 20:124)

This currency crisis is caused by the Turkish Lira being a fiat currency with no intrinsic value. In order to resolve this, Turkey must implement all the Islamic systems including the Islamic economic system, abolish the Lira and replace it with a new bi-metallic currency based on gold and silver. This is what it means to truly rely on Allah.

islamciv, Islamciv.com 4 Comments [10/15/2018 8:00:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 140924

The Devil is real. Hollywood worships the god of this world. The people who don't believe that Jesus is the Christ, and reject the Bible as inspired by God, ought to wake up to all the satanism in the music, movies and culture that they are saturated in. Evidence of God and Satan are everywhere. Evidence of the unseen spirit world is all around us. The wicked spirit of Satan is prevalent in Hollywood, Las Vegas and Walt Disney. The lying and deceptive spirit of Satan is prevalent in the mainstream newsmedia, Washington D.C. politics and Wall Street.

Few people realize that a witch wrote most of singer Elton John's songs, Bernie Taupin. Elton John's real problem is with God. The lyrics are written in witchcraft language, many by automatic writing (a demonic practice where a satanic force takes possession of your hand and writes the song for you). Even The Beach Boys admit that they were getting high on LSD and trying to make witchcraft music back in the 1960's. The Grateful Dead were originally called The Warlocks (male witches). Aleister Crowley (the poster-child for modern-day Rock music) was involved in the creation of the Rock music industry, teaching to walk, speak, write backwards (and use backward masking in music).

Homosexual gays accuse God-fearing Christians of corrupting religion and defiling God's love. The truth is that it's the gays who pervert everything, turning God's truth into a lie (Romans 1:25). Satanism is prevalent in American culture and society. Most people can't see the forest for the trees, because Satan has blinded them with worldly wisdom.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [10/15/2018 8:00:32 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 140765

The Salvation Army horribly teaches that salvation is a state, instead of a new birth. The Salvation Army teaches the satanic LIE that salvation is a temporary state that can be forfeited by unfaithfulness. Read their statement of faith for yourself...

“We believe that continuance in a state of salvation depends upon continued obedient faith in Christ.”

https://www.salvationarmy.org.nz/about-us/articles-of-faith

https://www.salvationarmy.org.uk/salvation-army-doctrines


That is works! The Salvation Army's founders were heretical Calvinists! I'm not sorry to say that the Salvation Army, and it's founders General William and Catherine Booth, are not saved if they truly believe that they must do something to remain in a state of salvation. That is not the free grace Gospel! You cannot earn eternal life. Clearly, the Salvation Army believes that salvation CAN be lost, by not continuing in obedient faith. You cannot find any such nonsense in the Scriptures!

My friend, you do not become righteous by living a righteous life. Your soul needs to be washed! Only the precious blood of Jesus can do that! The only way to be declared righteous with God the Father, is through submitting by faith to the sacrifice of God's only begotten Son on the cross to pay for your sins. Salvation is not me meaning business, it is God meaning business! The Gospel must not be altered to pressure people to turn away from their sinful bad habits, otherwise it is a false Gospel. The true Gospel is solely by God's grace, easy and free and so simple that even a small child can be saved, simply by believing.

Christ died for me, the JUST for the UNJUST!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Precious 9 Comments [10/15/2018 7:54:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 140773

30 years later I was able to crawl back from the dead, slowly but surely and accomplish this in this lifetime. I have fully researched, discovered, and codified OT 9 - along with Infinity Procedure which is one single procedure that is composed of three parts that can handle a PC to clear, and take them all the way through to OT, and finally culminate in an additional state beyond OT.

I am here, and I am here to complete and continue my mission of bringing the discoveries that are Dianetics and Scientology to anyone who will pick up a set of cans. Come hell or high water I'll be damned if this is lost to Mankind as I wholeheartedly believe and have demonstrated that it is the only source of salvation for us all and the only means for building better and stable lives. So I will continue to go about things much as I always have and let the Technology and it's results speak for themselves, with no worries as I am certain that in the years to come all I have done will be vindicated and I can once again have the upmost pride in the fact that Scientologists stand millions strong.

"L. Ron Hubbard", L. Ron Hubbard Rising 7 Comments [10/15/2018 7:54:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 140782

At the core, many cases of sexual assault involve 2 people, drunk, going into a room then coming out telling different stories. In the absence of physical evidence or other witnesses that's a really hard crime to prove. It's he said/she said.

Many movements recently have been trying to deal with this by lowering the standard of evidence required to find someone guilty, which is concerning because obviously you can't have accusation = guilt in any reasonable society.


Tonus, MMO Champion 10 Comments [10/15/2018 7:54:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 140800

I can infer the "truth" about the de-evolution theory by the 2nd law of Thermodynamics than you can for macroevolution, but that is a mocking sarcasm against the "preponderance of evidence" reasoning for the evolution theory. Do men act like apes around females? Do not many witnesses, both men and women, will attest to men behaving like Neanderthals? Do law enforcements testify to men acting like Cro-Magnum men when subduing females against their will for mating? One can observe and prove the de-evolution theory quite well by such a preponderance of evidence and yet we know it is not true, right?

Science cannot prove the age of anything by their dating method when it goes past known human history since they are errant dating results as proven by history and even in the present day; example; a living mollusk is carbon dated as 2,300 years old "dead". So how can any one take stock in their dating methods past human history? No self respecting scientists can.

And when the errant dating methods does not meet their evolutionary time table or find a fossil out of place as found with fossils in according to their geographical evolutionary time table, they conveniently place it in according to the evolutionary time chart.

Evidence of this is how fossilized whale bones and other fossilized marine life were found on the top of the Andes Mountains buried "TOGETHER" with fossilized land animal bones like the extinct Gibbon. The "scientists" testify that they can just bend over and pick them right up, but to counter them being buried together, they spun the tale in presenting the evidence in according to the evolutionary time table by saying that the mountains rose suddenly from the sea, trapping marine life by doing so, and yet offer no explanation for the fossilized land animal bones that were found buried together with the fossilized marine life.

WHALE FOSSILS HIGH IN ANDES SHOW HOW MOUNTAINS ROSE FROM SEA

The scientific fact about the reservoir effect where marine life will absorb carbon 14 at a lower rate than land animals seems to be purposefully overlooked in favor of presenting these preponderance of evidence. That means they would get a different dating result by those fossilized bones on that mountaintop buried together. See the evidence of the Biblical global flood yet?

They are now changing the time table from when they said that birds evolved from dinosaurs to now.. dinosaurs had evolved from birds. Would birds in flight receive a higher absorption of carbon 14 than land animals? In any event, what they had said formerly as being a fact or true, they are now changing their "facts" or the "presentation" of the evidence but still only within the parameters of the evolution theory.

When our government gives grants to those that try to prove the evolution theory, you can suspect any proposals for grants to be geared towards that effect when their livelihood is at stake.

Now if that false science is not circumspect enough, Jesus's words testify to Noah's flood as a real time event as a warning to believers to be ready or else because Peter warned of a fiery judgment was coming in 2 Peter 3 rd chapter also in relation to Noah's flood.

Jesus validated the first marriage. He validated the reason behind the creation of the sabbath day. He warned believers in regards to how God has judged the world by the flood in Noah's days and judged the cities of Sodom & Gomorrah of that coming judgment of destruction that will occur after His appearing for why they are to be ready & willing to go or else.

No genetic information has ever been observed as being added to a living organism. It will never happen. The Law of Biogenesis sees to that as life cannot come from nothing; life comes from similar life, but evolutionists keeps glossing over that law because they coined the term microevolution from that law to make macroevolution "look" plausible. It is a deception.

So you either believe Jesus's words or you believe the ever changing words of fallible men by their fallible devices for what that false science that is the evolution theory is all about; the world withholding the truth in unrighteousness.

HopefulNChrist, BaptistBoard 10 Comments [10/15/2018 7:55:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 140803

A lot of ungodly people are upset with Pastor Anderson for his tough love preaching against sinners. Albeit, I want you to mentally do something. Picture eternity on Judgment Day, when the future will be no more. In eternity, do you really think for one second that God is going to tolerate, honor and accept two homosexual men, who were “married” on earth? Do you think Steven Anderson will have to lower his head in shame in God's holy presence, or the homosexuals and national leaders who have banned him from entering into their countries with the truth? Do you think God is going to judge 50/50, blaming both sides and justifying both sides, as is common in this filthy, wicked and warped world of sin in which we live? Not a chance. Pastor Anderson is going to be 100% vindicated, as will I, because we “let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.” The coming judgment in eternity will not be a time of negotiation, it will be a time when all men WILL BE JUDGED according to their works.

If you think God will side with the homosexual agenda, you are gravely in error. Likewise, a lot of people are upset with me for stepping on toes with my tough preaching. Albeit, I guarantee you that when we all stand in judgment before God, I will be vindicated in my preaching and stand, and that includes my stand against new-evangelicals who make light of the verbal inspiration of the King James Bible. New-evangelicals make light of the purity of God's Word, and the clarity of the Gospel, and women's modest attire, and the proper meaning of Bible repentance for salvation, et cetera. I have more respect for a homosexual than I do for a new-evangelical pastor, who is indifferent toward the truth!

It will boil down to you are either saved or lost! You either “DIE IN THE LORD” (Revelation 14:13); or you “DIE IN YOUR SINS” (John 8:24). Either your sins were paid for on the cross by the Lord Jesus Christ, or else you foolishly rejected Christ's payment and will have to pay for your own sins in the Lake of Fire (Revelation 20:15). A lot of the people ripping against Steven Anderson are not saved, and they clearly do not understand the Word of God. Although some people may claim that is exactly why it is damaging what Brother Anderson is doing, offending people with hard in-your-face preaching, I completely disagree. If there is one thing that I have learned in my 39 years as a born-again Christian, it is that people are going to do what they are going to do, and it has little to do with what we do.

Granted, the Bible says Jude 1:22, “And of some have compassion, making a difference.” I do actually think that Pastor Anderson greatly hinders his ministry by a lack of compassion for sinners, but that doesn't change the truthfulness of his message, nor the consequences of not heeding the truth. Hebrews 10:31, “It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.” Psalms 36:1, “The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes.” Brother Anderson has only been alive on planet earth for 36 years, God has been here for all eternity! Pastor Anderson is still learning. Anybody with half a brain knows that truth! There is no a homosexual on the planet who doesn't know that there is a holy God, who made them normal, and He is a good God, and pastor Anderson is just a human being too, imperfect. Who is a sodomite to question a pastor's lack of love for homosexuals? Yeah, that's what I thought! No one can blame Steven Anderson.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 10 Comments [10/15/2018 7:55:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 140807

As soon as people bring up fallacies I ignore them. It's just another way to make someone look bad that you don't agree with. Its just an adult version of school yard name calling. Kind of like when all else fails insult someones grammar or spelling.

NothingIsImpossible, Christian Forums 15 Comments [10/15/2018 7:55:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 140925

gothicraichu asked:

what does zendaya is meechee have to do with tumblr sjw's and making everything LGBT+????????


because this is exactly the kind of humour that liberal tumblr puts on this fucked up pedestal and refuses to accept criticism on. If someone doesn’t think it’s funny, like me, good fucking luck for us because that’s all you’ll be going on about for months. you find some “meme” that’s vaguely reminiscent of the 2012 era “random XD” humour and promote the shit out of it, beating it to death in the process. that’s what the sjws do constantly. sound familiar yet? everyone claims straight people can’t face forms of oppression but i have to fucking disagree with that. Also the guy in the video looks like a fucking walnut.

circumsizedbagel, tumblr 5 Comments [10/15/2018 8:00:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 140927

Bishop blocked by Twitter – for telling the truth about sex abuse in the Roman Catholic Church

That notorious purveyor of hate and guile, the Rt Rev’d Dr Gavin Ashenden, has been blocked by Twitter. Actually, the tense is wrong: he was blocked by Twitter, but recanted and deleted and is now restored. The allegation of purveying hate and guile is also wrong: it is hard to imagine a more amiable, gentle and honest soul tweeting into the cybersphere. But ‘hate’ is what Twitter accused him of, and so he was ordered to recant and repent on pain of eternal excommunication. Deletion was insufficient: he had to prostrate himself in humility at the feet of the Twitter Pontiff, and beg to be restored to his ministry.

Bishop Gavin spent the day considering whether he would do either or both. He mulled and prayed and anguished for many an hour: should he recant and beg? Would he come to regret his decision and recant his recantation? He sought fellowship and wisdom among friends, and decided that since the article he had commented upon had been written some days ago, this particular tweet was not performing to much continued purpose. He considered that deleting it and continuing to foster public conversation on behalf of the kingdom was the better course. He then discovered that on pressing the ‘delete’ button, his Twitter excommunication was immediately withdrawn. He was restored without further pleading.

His tweet was a link to an article written by the Rev’d Dr Jules Gomes, which concerned sex abuse in the Roman Catholic Church. The article is fairly robust in its research, though quite unremarkable in its assertions: it is surely a matter of biological fact that the scandal engulfing the Roman Catholic Church is primarily one of homosexual clergy preying on teenage boys. It is not paedophilia (though the term is often applied in the vernacular), but ephebophilia – that is, sexual interest in mid-to-late adolescents. Since the Roman clerical hierarchy is exclusively male, and altar boys are boys, and seminarians are young men, it is surely not only a matter of biological fact but also of irrefutable logic that the scandal is exactly as Gavin Ashenden described it: not paedophilia, but predominantly one of homosexual lust.

He had previously written about gay predators himself, but this appears to be an unmentionable truth on Twitter: a violation of their rules against ‘hateful conduct’. Bishop Gavin shared no ‘hate’, and yet the infallible edict descended in order to censor him and demand conformation to Twitter’s moral orthodoxy. It is hard to discern where this might stop. Is it ‘hate’ to quote Moses (Lev 18:22)? Is it ‘hate’ to quote St Paul (Rom 1:26f)? Is it ‘hate’ to tell people they are sinners and need saving? Is it ‘hate’ to tweet ‘offensive’ extracts of the Bible? Would Twitter block Jesus?

If, as Dr Gomes avers (with supporting links), 80 per cent of the sex abuse in the Roman Catholic Church is of a homosexual nature, and only 96 of 4,329 priest offenders were classified as true paedophiles, how can it be ‘hate’ to tweet this? He writes: “The US bishops even admitted that ‘an understanding of the crisis is not possible’ without speaking of ‘the presence of homosexually oriented priests’. Criminologist Margaret Smith, who worked on the John Jay report, insisted that: ‘The majority of abusive acts were homosexual in nature.'”

One cannot be too critical of paedophilia, but this is not that. Surely one has to be careful when speaking of sexual abuse lest one point the finger at the wrong group? Don’t we need to properly define our terms so we are clear what we are talking about and whom we are criticising?

Was it the phrase “predominately a gay crime” which caused the Twitter police to block Bishop Gavin? It can hardly be “homosexual lust”, unless Twitter is of the view that homosexuals don’t experience lust as much as heterosexuals or bisexuals do. How would they measure such things?

Either way, this is not ‘hate speech’: it is simply factually correct. It is a crime to engage in sexual activity with minors (fact), but around 80 per cent of the recorded instances of sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Church were committed by homosexual adults on pubescent or post pubescent boys (fact). It is, therefore, predominantly a gay crime. Or perhaps the Twitter police were being grammatically pedantic? People may be gay, but a crime may not: is ‘gay crime’ a juxtaposition which offends against the public mood of progressive tolerance? Must it be censored to avoid the public paying attention to the more problematic areas of gay culture?

By censoring this, does Twitter not become complicit in the perpetuation of sex abuse in the Roman Catholic Church? At the very least, does it not become an impediment to academic inquiry and wider understanding? And by censoring Bishop Gavin Ashenden, are they not defaming him as a ‘hate preacher’? This erstwhile Chaplain-to-the-Queen has been found guilty of threatening or harassing people on the basis of their sexual orientation, and from this judgment there is no appeal; no natural justice. He must re-learn what virtue is, and what moral goods are, and only then may he resume his role in the social-media order. In the tensions of moral conflict, where compatibility is difficult if not impossible, it is orthodox Christians (and Jews and Muslims?) who are forced either to re-think their way through some painful choices, or to work out a strategy for evading these choices. Yet it is only by raising and openly debating these moral tensions and conflicts that public morality acquires an important dimension of its content. Shouldn’t Twitter be facilitating that conversation, rather than hurling ‘hate’ at every slightly contentious use of terminology?

Who reported Bishop Gavin? That’s the interesting question. Is it not preferable to take up a matter of dispute with your brother rather than run to the Twitter police and demand his suppression and restriction? What are you afraid of? Truth?

Archbishop Cranmer, Archbishop Cranmer 6 Comments [10/15/2018 8:01:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 52463

(Emphasis added by me)

Subject: Gay rights

Message: A straight person cannot marry the person of his choice; he can only marry the woman of his choice. Gays have the same right. Legally, they are both treated equally. ****Sexual attraction has never been a proponent for marriage.****

If two straight men wanted to marry for business advantages, just like many men and women do, that wouldn't be allowed. ****Marriage has nothing to do with love, attraction, or compatability.**** Straights marry for many reasons.

Straights and gays have the same choice, therefore, the same rights.

normobrian, This was sent via email after a response i made on Yahoo Answers 55 Comments [11/18/2008 12:26:11 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Kimby

Quote# 52505

You poor Atheist sods , I feel so sorry for the lot of you , you all are so glad that Kent Hovind is out of the way because you could not prove any of his theories wrong and now you can go on and believe in your Religion (evolution).Or do you all believe in nothing? The end of the world is coming you better get your lives right. Deep down you all know that there is a God so stop fooling yourself and go to church.

anonymous, The Atheist Experience 79 Comments [11/18/2008 12:34:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | top