1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | bottom
Quote# 136591

The philosophy of not caring

As men, by our nature we have the compelling need to care. About our children, our jobs, our siblings, our parents, our wives/girlfriends, our friends. Men have an innate desire for loyalty.

Back in the day a man could care with no ill will or detriment towards him. But since we live in a gynocentric society, our cares aren't worth a flying fuck. Nothing you want matters to anyone, society views men as disposable. I refuse to be seen as disposable. I have no problem putting others first if it is reciprocal. However, I'm not a piece of trash. I refuse to be tossed out.

It's been a hard journey, but I've been learning to detach myself from the world and not give a fuck about anything: sexism, lgbt, politics I don't care. Simple as that. What's honestly better in life than to go home, drink a beer or your choice liquor, kick up your feet and listen to music or watch hbo or enjoy the nature outside.

The key to fulfillment is to not care about anyone but yourself and your brothers.

Toxicthrowaway413, r/MGTOW 15 Comments [2/12/2018 3:24:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136607

That Aryan Spirit is still here, hidden nonetheless in the DNA-Code of certain people, people who have retained in some part the ancient Blood-Memory. The physical race does not exist today, except in race cases, and even then physical appearance does not necessarily match with the 'spiritual race' within the individual. As Miguel Serrano never tired of pointing out, today's struggle is for Spiritual Blood and Spiritual Race and not just Biological Blood and Biological Race. True it has to be said, in order to resurrect the Arya, the Aryan Race, a biological vessel will be needed to take the Spiritual Race, since the body must support the Higher Race. But today we do not have this, and as Nietzsche pointed out - we are the solitaries who will one day form a people, and from this people shall arise the 'Superman'. We are at a stage of this process which is fulfilled through the resurrection of the Solar Race. Some form of physical mutation would seem necessary for this to come about.

Opposed to the Aryan Spirit is an Anti-Spirit which created the major religions of the world - Judaism, Christianity and Islam. This Anti-Spirit also created Liberalism, Marxist Socialism, Marxist Communism (and all forms of Global Socialism and Global Communism), Liberal Democracy, Humanitarianism, Anarchism. It created Capitalism and the greed for profit and gain; it created the Economic Consumer Society in which people become 'consumers' a 'commodity' in themselves; its technology chained the world to the 'World Wide Web' where it can control the minds of the masses. It promoted 'Equality' and the levelling down of people to the lowest; it promoted the 'Slave-Mentality' of the modern world; it produced the 'Ultimate Man' - the slave! The antithesis of the Noble Arya is the Ignoble Anti-Spirit. Whereas the Aryan Race was the 'Master Race' which ruled the world with its superior knowledge, wisdom and understanding, its Aryan Sciences, and its Aryan Weltanshauung, today the Anti-Spirit rules and even the survival of the Earth is threatened.

All ancient myths and legends speak of this 'Higher Race', and all agree that at sometime in the very ancient past this noble race became corrupted by a Dark Power that distorted the leadership and distorted the higher purpose of this Solar Race. This goes way, way back into the distant past, but the time which this really comes into effect seems to centre around the time of the sinking of Atlantis. The key to this lies in the High Race mixing its Igneous Blood with lower races of man who dwelt upon the Earth. This seems to have caused the sinking of Hyperborea originally, and later the sinking of Atlantis when the shift from the Polar-Centre to the North-Western Centre occurred.

Wulf Ingessunu, Inglinga 11 Comments [2/12/2018 1:35:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 136612

Maybe there is another take on what Jesus said, maybe He was talking about the "poor" in Spirit.
There a lot of Christians who don't put their whole trust in God, He is the One who will provide all our needs.

God doesn't have a problem with us having lots of money, in fact He even says, ask and you will receive. Why would anybody want to take a vow of poverty, when God has enough riches stored up for us all.

Tasseio, Charisma 21 Comments [2/12/2018 1:43:45 PM]
Fundie Index: 11

Quote# 136630

At the rate the illegal mudslime invaders are traversing the Adriatic and landing in Italy it won’t be long before the blood of Christians will be spayed up the inside walls of the Colosseum.

The imagination does not need to run wild to picture in the near future, Christians being sacrificed en masse in front of a baying islamic crowd who are chowing down on halal shacks between beheadings.

By the way I think those two churches in Mosul and Aleppo had already been “lit up”…

BigFek, Bare Naked Islam 6 Comments [2/13/2018 11:46:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136631

(He's talking about Islam, and as usual for the idiots at BNI gets it completely wrong)

MY feelings EXACTLY! It is a matter of self-preservation, in my opinion. This dark, sinister principality kills human beings with more depravity and sadism than any horror movie director could imagine! It is a terrifying, direct threat to Humanity and erodes the spirits of the remaining pure, decent and righteous people on Earth. Its complete disregard for ALL LIFE must be stopped lest more and more innocent blood be shed. It lusts for the blood of innocents.

Notice now how the MSM is flooding us with commercials about the “poor, persecuted” Rohinga from Burma/Myanmar. What they forget to tell us is that their plight is a direct result of the rapes, be headings, and burning they committed against the majority Buddhist population. Buddhists are among the most non-violent people on this Earth. It takes an awful lot to make Buddhists resort to violence!!!

Jesus said that the meek shall inherit the Earth, but it sure appears that the opposite is true, unless He plans on coming down here to save us from the Evil that I believe and can only conclude is the true face of Islam.

Victor, Bare Naked Islam 10 Comments [2/13/2018 11:47:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136638

Jesus Died for Pedophiles, Rapists and Murderers

Romans 5:6-8, “For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.”

What a beautiful passage of Scripture! Few people would be willing to give their life, to die, for a righteous man. In some rare situations, a person might even be willing to give their life, to die, for a good man. But who in the world would be willing to sacrifice their life, to die, for a pervert, for a thug rapist or murderer? The answer is NO ONE! But wait, there is Someone who was willing to die for the vilest of society. There is Someone who was willing to die for the forgotten convicts rotting in prisons around the world. There is Someone who was willing to die for the lowest of the low of society. That noble Person's name is Jesus!

Carefully notice our text passage of Scripture, lest you feel self-righteousness and fail to realize that YOU are as guilty as that pedophile, rapist and murderer for whom Christ died. Romans 5:8, “But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.” Notice that the Bible doesn't say that Christ died for the worst of the worst of sinners; but rather, CHRIST DIED FOR US! That means, you and I are as guilty as the vilest criminal in God's eyes. James 2:10, “For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all.” The Law of God is like a mirror, that is, even if you gently tap it, it will shatter into hundreds of pieces! If you sin even one time, you are imperfect and cannot inherit eternal life. Consequently, you need a Savior!

My dear friend, the ONLY difference between you and the vilest pedophile, concerning Heaven, is the precious redeeming blood of Jesus Christ. In God's eyes, your lust, your hate, or the lies that you once told, are just as offensive and damning as are pedophiles to any normal person. Society hates anyone who would prey upon a helpless child. And rightfully so! But God hates your hurtful gossip just as much! God hates your HBO filth just as much! God hates your seductive tight miniskirt just as much! God equally hates your unwillingness to apologize for your past sins! God hates your stinginess and unwillingness to support Gospel missions! God hates your tolerance of the Alexandrian-based, modern, corrupt, Bible versions just as much! God hates Bob Jones University's support of the Alexandrian Bible perversions, that molests men's souls, just as much as He hates the sins of a child molester!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 24 Comments [2/14/2018 12:08:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 136639

People shouted ‘jump’ before suicidal man fell to his death
http://metro.co.uk/2015/03/16/people-shouted-jump-before-suicidal-man-fell-to-his-death-5106465/?ito=v-b
A suicidal man died when he fell from a building after people shouted ‘get on with it’ and ‘jump’ while police tried to coax him back from the edge.Some people even filmed the victim, aged in his 40s, as he fell to the floor on Saturday afternoon and one person was heard asking ‘how far can you bounce?’Police were called to the scene in Telford, West Midlands, and have since criticised those who shouted to the man.
Inspector Ben Smith said: ‘It is pretty appalling because it is someone who is clearly in need of support and assistance. That behaviour is something we would condemn.‘Clearly what that individual needed was time and space and a professional to help them out.
The individual would have been in need of care and support and appropriate intervention from medical professionals, so anything like that to encourage someone to jump should be unequivocally condemned.’
Kelly-Anne Taylor, 35, from Telford, said: ‘People were recording it with their phones and yelling at him to jump.
I can’t stop thinking about it. I was up town when it was happening and how much I wish I could have tried to help him.’

I do not see what the offense is here. The universe is indifferent to your being, and people have no obligation or duty to be sympathetic your being either.
It is very likely strangers to the "jumper" viewed the individual as annoyingly occupying time &/or space. At best believing the stunt to be overly dramatic and insultingly selfish, or at worst viewing the individual as mentally ill.

In either view there is no object reason a passerby need feel or discourage others from their self harming mania.
Morality is made up. It's not a real objective thing in the universe. There is no right or wrong- there are laws and social norms, both of which are transitory and relative.

Outrage is unnecessary save where it infringes on another person's safety or relative freedom.
When someone is in an unstable state shouting at them, let alone advising them to kill themselves could definitely be considered infringing on their safety.

Your safety is what I clearly am talking about above. It is not necessary to be outraged people are jumping off buildings as long as it is not effecting those walking by or the infrastructure one maneuvers within.
Which jumping off buildings does effect, naturally. However it is that which should outrage an individual- that it inconvenience your day and probably cost some money to clean up.

Outrage because one may think some passerby is an "asshole" is foolish. Outrage out of some "moral" stance is unnecessary.

I wonder if you'd say the same thing if it was one of your loved ones being encouraged by apathetic strangers to kill themselves.

I would
The state of the loved one is important to me, but I do not believe others have a duty or obligation to be sympathetic to my loved ones or my feelings toward a loved one.
Imagine a different scenario:
I come across a child with obviously diminished mental capacity holding a hand gun. I heckle the child telling it that it should put the gun in its mouth and pull the trigger. The child does.
Would you be outraged? Would the situation be so different?

At your heckling? No.
At the circumstances that lead to a person with diminished mental capacity having a firearm, probably so. Because it is not in the best interest of myself, and society in general, to have firearms so accessible.
You would be a jerk, sure. The heckling is not where I would say valid outrage should be directed, however.



Fencers, mmo-champion 13 Comments [2/14/2018 12:08:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 136647

Evolutionary Theory vs Universal Common Descent

Evolutionary Theory is about the change in heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.

Universal Common Descent is about the monophyly of life, i.e., how every organism we observe today shares a common ancestor: single celled organisms that developed from primordial goo.

While it is true that accepting Universal Common Descent requires accepting Evolutionary Theory, why do so many people think that accepting Evolutionary Theory requires accepting Universal Common Descent? Creationists can believe God created as He described in Genesis, while believing God built into His creation natural mechanisms for organisms to adapt.

NesterGoesBowling, r/creation 18 Comments [2/14/2018 5:03:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 116214



Original Knight Riders of the Ku Klux Klan, Original Knight Riders of the Ku Klux Klan 27 Comments [1/22/2016 4:19:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 11
Submitted By: TimeToTurn

Quote# 136665

she's already whitewashed and if she's whitewashed while being pure blooded korean with korean immigrant parents in a korean populated neighborhood. she's truly already beyond fucking lost and it's her father's fault. what korean father puts his daughter into snowboarding? her profile says shes fluent in korean, but try to find one interview where she speaks it. ( i won't hold it against her for not speaking korean, but don't put it out like you do)

Anthrofighter, Reddit 12 Comments [2/15/2018 2:09:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 136669

(Koanic)
> Jesus said “resist not evil”,

https://infogalactic.com/info/Turning_the_other_cheek#Nonviolent_resistance_interpretation

> We have to interpret the sermon on the mount as Jesus anticipating crucifixion

No, it dampens the culture of honor dueling by submitting the aggressor’s personal insults to the community for judgment, instead of personally enforcing one’s own justice, which renders murky who’s at fault.

(peppermint)
((Jesus)) was a gommie, and the destruction of personal honor in favor of ((community judgement)) is an early form of gommieism, like forbidding men from seeing whores instead of stuffing whores into convents.

(Koanic)

It does not destroy personal honor. King David had plenty of honor, but he did not revenge personal insults. Those were avenged by God and his son. He revenged insults against his ambassadors, for example, with genocide.

Idiots in bars fight on their own account, each being right in his own eyes. This is not honor.

Koanic and peppermint, Jim's Blog 9 Comments [2/15/2018 2:09:15 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 122979

PEPPERDINE EVOLUTION
Picture
How many students will lose their faith because of the theory of Marco Evolution?

Clint Loveness
Video Producer at Bluefish TV
Founder of www.ProvetheBible.com

My name is Clint Loveness, a 2007 Pepperdine alumnus. I am concerned about the theistic evolution classes that were taught at the Pepperdine Lectureships this past spring. I want to share a little bit of my story in an effort to communicate why this is an important issue to me. My brother and I grew up going to church our whole lives: we were leaders in the youth group and my brother even preached some sermons at our church. About five years ago, I realized that my brother stopped going to church while he was going to Pepperdine; later on, I found out that he had doubts about the Bible. One of the questions "out of many others" that he struggled with was with the topic of evolution and the idea that everything took millions of years to become what it is now. He came back from Pepperdine with a post-modern worldview. My brother would have been the last person that I would have imagined losing his faith, and I was very shocked to hear my brother doubting that Jesus was the Son of God; I became more and more grieved because he got to the point where he could not talk about God without getting upset. I started to seek counsel from my minister and my church, and I read the book called The Case for Faith by Lee Strobel. It introduced me to the branch of study know as apologetics, the definition of which is having the ability to defend the Christian faith with logical, persuasive reasons regarding why the Bible is true. After I read that book, my most pressing thought was, “Why was I not taught any of this before?" This changed my whole life because I learned about all of the evidence that supports the Bible. In the past I was shy to share my faith because I was intimidated by not having all of the answers. But studying apologetics gave me a new excitement to talk with strangers and atheists about my faith because I can give them intelligent reasons to believe the claims of Christianity, and I can use logic to explain why the Bible is true. Inspired by my passion for apologetics and the defense of my faith, I made a website called ProvetheBible.com to help people like my brother obtain answers to their hard questions.

At the Lectureships they mentioned that there is a shortage of preachers because the younger generation is not interested in the church. I believe that one reason for this lack of interest is that we are not teaching them how to personally defend their faith. I was excited to hear that Jeff Walling will be working at Pepperdine to train future preachers. I enjoyed his class on apologetics called "Faith in a Post-Christian World: Is it stupid to still Believe?” This was an outstanding class on defending the faith and I believe we need to teach more classes like that giving us reasons to believe in a culture that is very postmodern.

I was surprised that the Bible lectureships hosted so many classes on theistic evolution, which is very controversial in Christian circles. There were a total of six classes taught by these Pepperdine professors: Chris Doran, Chris Heard, Rodney Honeycutt, Jeanine Thweatt-Bates and Donna Nofziger. Theistic evolution is dangerous because it forces you to compromise scripture, which I will show you by sharing some examples. Chris Doran and Chris Heard said that they did not believe in a literal Adam or Eve.

After the class Tim Brinley and I both asked Chris Heard, an Old Testament Bible professor at Pepperdine, if Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel, Noah, and the world wide flood were literal events; my mouth dropped open when he said, "No, they were not real people or events." Right then and there, I realized that it’s no wonder that people like my brother do not believe the Bible anymore when their own Bible professors refuse to believe that the book of Genesis is a literal, historical account. Chris Heard also stated that he believes that the first historical person started with Abraham; this means he is skipping nineteen generations of people that are an important part of Christ's genealogy. Jesus quotes Noah as being a true event, so for Chris Heard to NOT take it literally is to doubt the words of Jesus, which puts the entire foundation of Christianity on a shaky basis!

In addition to my shocking encounter with Professor Heard, I met another student who doubted the Bible’s trustworthiness. When I asked him about the reasons for his doubts, he said that some elders at the Conejo Church of Christ did not take Genesis literally; because of them, he said he couldn’t trust the rest of the Bible. Those elders were Pepperdine professors. If we don't believe Genesis—the foundational book of our world’s entire history—we start doubting the rest of the Bible, and when that happens, our entire Christian foundation becomes extremely unstable.

According to many recent statistics, 75% of students leave the faith when they reach college. Why is this the case? I love the church, but the church teaches people what to believe instead of the reasons why they should believe it. If we teach critical thinking skills to our students, presenting them with both sides of a particular argument or worldview, they can then compare different worldviews and thereby strengthen and develop their own faith, which is something that I believe will help them want to evangelize and share their faith with others. As things stand right now, however, I feel that Pepperdine is forcing students to only hear one worldview, that of theistic evolution, and they are being narrow-minded by refusing to teach the facts supporting creationism or the flaws of evolution, of which there are many. Once the word gets out that Pepperdine is essentially indoctrinating students with theistic evolution, this will potentially divide Christians and stop students from coming to a school that is teaching these decidedly unbiblical, faulty views. Most Christians believe in creationism and will, quite possibly, be highly offended when they hear about what these new professors are teaching the students. I believe the solution to this potential division is to teach both creationism and evolution just as they are, and let the students make up their own minds. I believe that instead of teaching students why we HAVE to believe in evolution, we need to also offer more classes on apologetics to teach us why we can trust the Bible by examining fulfilled prophecy, archaeology, early manuscripts, reading outside secular historians that confirm the Biblical accounts, etc. As an example of the kinds of classes and materials I’m suggesting, you can find my top ten list on why we can trust the Bible by clicking on this link. For the sake of students’ belief in the validity of Christianity, we should be more worried about students learning this type of information rather than simply cramming the unscientific, faulty teachings of evolution down their throats.

I believe you will see that macroevolution is the doorway to atheism. We absolutely cannot compromise when it comes to teaching the credibility of God’s Word, because intelligent people like my brother know that evolution goes against the Bible and you cannot mix the Bible and the teachings of evolution without compromising. For example, Exodus 20:11 is one of the places in the Bible that describes the Ten Commandments; in the middle of listing the Commandments, it says that God made all of creation in six days and rested on the seventh, and God uses that as an example for our workweek. However, if you do not believe the verse about God creating all of creation in six literal days, why should you believe the rest of that same Chapter when it describes the Ten Commandments? Does that mean we should think that God was wrong about the Commandments too?


Clint Loveness, pepperdineevolution.weebly.com 16 Comments [12/12/2016 11:29:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 37779

"The long-term goal of Christians in politics should be to gain exclusive control over the franchise. Those who refuse to submit publicly to the eternal sanctions of God by submitting to His Church's public marks of the covenant--baptism and holy communion--must be denied citizenship, just as they were in ancient Israel."

Gary North, Political Polytheism: The Myth of Pluralism (Tyler, TX: Institute for Christian Economics, 1989), p. 87.

Gary North, Dispatches from the Culture Wars 36 Comments [4/17/2008 2:57:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: David D.G.

Quote# 21868

well at least christian has a book named bible unlike other religions!!

girlsrthebest, Youtube 39 Comments [3/9/2007 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Vael300

Quote# 1481

Yes, Kathy P, some muslims have let themselves be "matryed" for their beliefs. But if you read Catholic writings of the saints, there is no doubt that they were being matryed for their faith in Jesus, not some fictional god like the god depicted in the koran.

Rose46, Rapture Ready 3 Comments [11/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 128721

Democrats have oceans of blood on their hands.
Number of abortions in the US since Roe v. Wade: ~60 million
Number of deaths since DDT was banned: 50 million+
Democrats have killed more people than Communism.

coolmanfromthepast, Tumblr 13 Comments [7/1/2017 10:38:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 15701

God can heal anything, but what God does for us depends on our capacity to believe that he can do it for us.

This is a true story:(not that you'll believe me ,but whatever...

A pastor once told a story about a man in a wheelchair that he asked, "Do you want to walk?" The man said, " Yes!" The pastor said, " Then get up!" The man struggled to get up. This happened two more times, so the pastor ripped the blanket off of the man to see that he had no legs. Immediately, he stopped telling the man to get up. Why, because the only person in that room who believed that he man could get up with no legs was the man himself. Their doubt may well have cost that man new legs. They beleived that a crippled man with legs could get up, but they didn't believe that God could heal a man without legs.

My point of view is what you call a cop-out: I don't care if you never see a miracle or proof thereof, the judgement is certain. (This should get some blood boiling)

humbledbyhim, Christian Forums 37 Comments [10/6/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Axver

Quote# 11526

A man acting effeminate is a step in the direction of being gay. After all, aren't women attracted to men? So if a man acts like a woman, isn't that a step in the direction of being gay?

shinbits, Christianforums 28 Comments [5/9/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Dracon427

Quote# 136640

Allow this oldfag to give it to you straight, since thankfully this is one term that nobody needs a longpost to explain:

It's the belief that existing cultures are responsible for sustaining all of society's inequalities.
It differs from conventional Marxism in that conventional Marxism argues that economic classes are responsible for said inequalities.

This belief structure is one of the sacred cows of the regressive left, alongside postmodernist theory, and suffice to say there is a big fucking drive to keep the waters on the subject as muddy as humanly possible. Many regressive leftists like arguing it's nothing more than a conspiracy theory, and with good reason - just looking at that bolded text, any Kiwi can immediately recognize that damned near every bit of internet outrage that's happened over the last five fucking years, from the Ghostbusters 2016 controversy to the fucking Autism Holy War itself have, as the core reason they even fucking happened in the first place, that core fucking point in common with one another.

Jaimas, Kiwi Farms 9 Comments [2/14/2018 12:10:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 34765

I would really be glad if people would stop calling christians extremests, I mean so me and my freinds jumped a Satan worshipping kid , but that doesn't mean we're extremests

LukeDavis93, LucasForums.com 81 Comments [2/10/2008 10:10:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Øyvind

Quote# 136587

Now to the reasons you paged me. I like to jerk off to CP from time to time. Underage girls placed in a sexual context become sexually attractive to me. Not posing naked (that does nothing), but the actual sexual stuff. I just love how pure and strong their emotions are, this is the main attraction to me.

The second thing I love about CP is the idea of corrupting children. It fuels my fantasy, and makes my faps better.

Third thing is that I feel like I missed a lot in life not being more sexually active when I was a child. CP helps me re-visit the fantasy world of my own childhood. Better faps.

User8423, Reddit 25 Comments [2/11/2018 11:23:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 22

Quote# 136610

Amos Moses:
The philosophical contradictions of the trans worldview - Lifesite
An argument about transgender identities will be much more persuasive if it concerns who someone is, not merely how someone identifies. And so the rhetoric of the transgender moment drips with ontological assertions: people are the gender they prefer to be. That’s the claim.
Transgender activists don’t admit that this is a metaphysical claim. They don’t want to have the debate on the level of philosophy, so they dress it up as a scientific and medical claim. And they’ve co-opted many professional associations for their cause. Thus the American Psychological Association, in a pamphlet titled “Answers to Your Questions about Transgender People, Gender Identity, and Gender Expression,” tells us, “Transgender is an umbrella term for persons whose gender identity, gender expression, or behavior does not conform to that typically associated with the sex to which they were assigned at birth.” Notice the politicized language: a person’s sex is “assigned at birth.” Back in 2005, even the Human Rights Campaign referred instead to “birth sex” and “physical sex.”
The phrase “sex assigned at birth” is now favored because it makes room for “gender identity” as the real basis of a person’s sex. In an expert declaration to a federal district court in North Carolina concerning H.B. 2, Dr. Deanna Adkins stated, “From a medical perspective, the appropriate determinant of sex is gender identity.” Dr. Adkins is a professor at Duke University School of Medicine and the director of the Duke Center for Child and Adolescent Gender Care (which opened in 2015). Adkins argues that gender identity is not only the preferred basis for determining sex, but “the only medically supported determinant of sex.” Every other method is bad science, she claims: “It is counter to medical science to use chromosomes, hormones, internal reproductive organs, external genitalia, or secondary sex characteristics to override gender identity for purposes of classifying someone as male or female.”
This is a remarkable claim, not least because the argument recently was that gender is only a social construct, while sex is a biological reality. Now, activists claim that gender identity is destiny, while biological sex is the social construct.

Enniscorthy:
From the "Media Bias/Fact Check" website: "Life Site News"
EXTREME RIGHT BIAS
These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.
Factual Reporting: MIXED
Notes: LifeSiteNews “is a non-profit Internet service dedicated to issues of culture, life, and family.” The website was founded by the Campaign Life Coalition which has a far right bias. Both sources are anti-abortion and opposed to gay marriage. (11/25/2016)

Amos Moses:
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ............ oh .... i am sorry ... did you have something to say of any interest ..... FYI ...... unbiased ...... IS A MYTH ....... a .... oh how did you put it ..... a ...... CONSPIRACY THEORY ................. and you are still a liar and a JOKE .......... and an ACCIDENTAL THEORIST ............oh ... i forgot ..... SO WHAT ..............
Southern Poverty Law Center Adds Itself To List Of Hate Groups
February 7, 2018

Enniscorthy:
All your name calling aside, it's prudent to check your sources before posting to make sure they're reputable and not far-right jokes.

Amos Moses:
all of your opinions are dubious .............. and repeated lies ........ so dubious coming from you is ..... well ...... ahhhhh ..... DUBIOUS .........

Enniscorthy:
No, I cite reputable sources. You just happen to oppose those sources.

Amos Moses:
nope .... you cited a source that endorsed PEDOPHILIA [edit: The American Psychological Association] ........... and then took it back ..... and that is NOT REPUTABLE ....... "You just happen to oppose those sources." .... as you do SCRIPTURE ..... again ...... SO WHAT ................

Enniscorthy:
It didn't endorse pedophilia. It said that pedophilia might be an orientation. Once again, you fail to understand.

Amos Moses:
YUP ... it surely did ............ and you fail to acknowledge the truth ...........

Enniscorthy:
No, it didn't, but you're welcome to find the text that gave them free license to abuse children, either before or AFTER their retraction. I'll wait. Let's see how honest you really are.

Amos Moses:
yeah .... that is why we have homo-marriage .... because they said it was okey-dokey to play pokey wherever you want to ...... and they were about to do the same thing ........... and you are wrong .... and you are hurting people ............. and what you are saying is a lie ..... and so you are still a liar ..............

Amos Moses, Christian News Network 13 Comments [2/12/2018 1:41:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 136623






Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 9 Comments [2/13/2018 1:29:52 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 136611

DUTERTE ORDERS HIS TROOPS TO SHOOT WOMEN IN THE VAGINA

Rodrigo Duterte last week directed his soldiers to specifically target women rebel fighters by shooting them in the vagina, according to local reports.

Addressing a group of former communist rebels, the Philippines president said his armed forces should not kill female rebels but shoot them in their genitals because without them they are useless.

“Tell the soldiers. There’s a new order coming from the mayor. We won’t kill you. We will just shoot your vagina,” Duterte reportedly said. “If there is no vagina, it would be useless."

An official government translation of the speech, given on Feb. 7, replaced the word vagina with a dash. The transcript says the audience laughed in response.

Since taking power in June 2016 Duterte has presided over a bloody war on drug dealers and users, killing thousands of people, many in vigilante-style executions with the president’s approval.

The International Criminal Court said last week it was opening preliminary examinations into the war on drugs. However, given the ICC’s preliminary examinations into alleged war crimes in Afghanistan took more than a decade, there is little likelihood Duterte will face any immediate charges.

Duterte’s brief reign has been marked by a consistent stream of menacingly misogynistic comments.

In the past he has “joked” about raping an Australian missionary, made rape jokes about about Miss Universe, and told his soldiers they had permission to rape up to three women during conflict without being punished.

Last month in India Duterte said he would like to attract more tourists to the Philippines by offering “42 virgins.”

Duterte’s spokesman, Harry Roque, recently defended his boss’s misogyny, saying feminists were over-reacting and that the remarks were meant as humor. “I mean, that's funny. Come on. Just laugh,” Roque said.

Unsurprisingly, the president’s recent comments have been widely criticized.

“Duterte's latest nasty remark openly encourages violence against women, contributes to the impunity on such, and further presented himself as the epitome of misogyny and fascism terribly rolled in one,” Emmi de Jesus, a member of Congress representing the Gabriela Women’s Party, said in a statement.

Human Rights Watch researcher Carlos Conde called the comments “the latest in a series of misogynist, derogatory and demeaning statements he has made about women.”

“It encourages state forces to commit sexual violence during armed conflict, which is a violation of international humanitarian law,” he added.

Rodrigo Duterte, Vice News 27 Comments [2/12/2018 1:43:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 20

Quote# 132094

I think it's going to have a positive future, oddly, because creationism is only going to get more and more intellectually plausible. A lot like Intelligent Design. What's going to do it won't be 'evidence against evolution!' per se, but continued technological accomplishments by mankind. People already are getting into the idea of simulation theory (and that's on a secular level!) Most likely that idea is not going to go away, and the plausibility of a simulated universe goes hand in hand with the plausibility of that universe being a lot younger than we'd think.

Yesofcoursenaturally, r/creation 11 Comments [9/25/2017 1:46:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | top