1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | bottom
Quote# 130650

WASHINGTON — President Trump reverted Tuesday to blaming both sides for the deadly violence in Charlottesville, Va., and at one point questioned whether the movement to pull down Confederate statues would lead to the desecration of memorials to George Washington.

Abandoning his precisely chosen and carefully delivered condemnations of the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis from a day earlier, the president furiously stuck by his initial reaction to the unrest in Charlottesville. He drew the very moral equivalency for which a bipartisan chorus, and his own advisers, had already criticized him.

“I think there is blame on both sides,” the president said in a combative exchange with reporters at Trump Tower in Manhattan. “You had a group on one side that was bad. You had a group on the other side that was also very violent. Nobody wants to say that. I’ll say it right now.”

Mr. Trump defended those gathered in a Charlottesville park to protest the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee. “I’ve condemned neo-Nazis. I’ve condemned many different groups,” he said. “Not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me. Not all of those people were white supremacists by any stretch.”

He criticized “alt-left” groups that he claimed were “very, very violent” when they sought to confront the white nationalist and neo-Nazi groups that had gathered in Charlottesville.

“Many of those people were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee,” Mr. Trump said. “So this week, it is Robert E. Lee. I noticed that Stonewall Jackson is coming down. I wonder, is it George Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?”

It was a remarkable rejection of the criticism he confronted after waiting two days before naming the right-wing groups in the bloodshed that ended with the death of a young woman after a car crashed into a crowd of protesters.

Mr. Trump accused people he called the alt-left of “swinging clubs” as they “came charging at, as you say, at the alt-right.” He said some of the right-wing members of the crowd in the Virginia park were “bad.” But he added that the other side came “charging in without a permit and they were very, very violent.”

Aides had urged him for days to take the high ground, persuading him on Monday to read a brief statement condemning the neo-Nazi groups from the Diplomatic Room in the White House. But over the past day, back in his private New York residence for the first time since becoming president, Mr. Trump was alone, without his wife and young son, and consuming hours of television, with many on cable news telling him he had not done enough.

On Monday night, he was tweeting his frustration, accusing the “fake media” of never being satisfied. But by Tuesday morning, the president was fuming again. At a scheduled event about the permitting process for infrastructure, Mr. Trump asked for questions — contrary to the wishes of his aides, including John F. Kelly, his new chief of staff, who stood to the side, looking grim.

Venting, his face red as he personally executed the defense of his own actions that no one else would, Mr. Trump all but erased any good will he had earned Monday when he named racist groups and called them “repugnant to everything we hold dear.”

Mr. Trump said his initial statement was shaped by a lack of information about the events in Charlottesville, even though television statements had been broadcasting images of the violence throughout the morning.

“There was no way of making a correct statement that early,” he said. “I had to see the facts, unlike a lot of reporters. I didn’t know David Duke was there. I wanted to see the facts.”

Within minutes, Mr. Duke, a former Ku Klux Klan leader, praised Mr. Trump’s comments as a condemnation of “leftist terrorists.”

“Thank you President Trump for your honesty & courage to tell the truth about #Charlottesville,” Mr. Duke said in a Twitter post.

But Mr. Trump also made it clear that even now — with the benefit of hindsight — he does not accept the overwhelming criticism that he should have reserved his condemnation for the white supremacist and neo-Nazi groups.

Mr. Trump called the driver of the car who the authorities said crashed into the crowd, James Alex Fields Jr., 20, “a disgrace to himself, his family and this country. You can call it terrorism. You can call it murder. You can call it whatever you want.”

Speaking bluntly about an ongoing investigation in a way that presidents rarely do, Mr. Trump said Mr. Fields, who is being held without bail on charges of murder and malicious wounding in the death of Heather Heyer, is “a murderer.”

“What he did was a horrible, horrible, inexcusable thing,” Mr. Trump said.

But he refused to explicitly say that the killing of the young woman was a case of domestic terrorism, saying only that “you get into legal semantics.”

The president also gave himself a pat on the back from Ms. Heyer’s mother, who thanked him in a statement for “words of comfort and for denouncing those who promote violence and hatred” after Monday’s remarks.

Mr. Trump said: “I thought it was terrific. Under the kind of stress that she is under and the heartache she is under, I thought putting out that statement to me was really something I won’t forget.”

He also unleashed his frustration at the news media on Tuesday, saying they were being “fake” because they did not acknowledge that his initial statement about the Charlottesville protest was “very nice.”

Again and again, Mr. Trump rejected any portrayal that nationalist protesters in the city were all neo-Nazis or white supremacists, and he said it was unfair to suggest that they were.

He said blame for the violence in the city — which also took the lives of two Virginia state troopers when their helicopter crashed — should also be on people from “the left” who came to oppose the nationalist protesters.

The president said it should be “up to a local town, community” to say whether the statue of Lee should remain in place.

Soon after Mr. Trump was done speaking, he wandered close to the velvet rope line that held a group of about 20 reporters and photographers, his mood noticeably brighter. A reporter asked if he planned to visit Charlottesville after the tragedy there. Mr. Trump replied by saying he has a house there, and provided an endorsement of the Trump Winery nearby.

Then he disappeared into Trump Bar, taking a shortcut to his residence next door.

Donald Trump, New York Times 6 Comments [8/17/2017 9:25:52 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 130632

The terms "confident" and "insecure" are arbitrary word-viruses that have no meaning.

What if we got rid of these two terms? I've often wondered what basis they really have. They do far more harm than good, and they distort and confuse the true nature of reality and the human spirit.

While a lot of incels here probably identify as "insecure", many of them are very intelligent, insightful, funny, and have a strong command of the English language. I do not see anything outwardly "insecure" about them, though I realize behind a computer screen they are able to be more "themselves".

Then we look at the word "confident". Well, what is confidence, exactly?

I argue it's just mimicry of behaviors that Normies have agreed upon are attractive and acceptable.

If you take the average Chad or Normie who has "confidence", they're often dumb as rocks, project what they think constitutes confidence, and use their brains as little as possible to think anything through. They rely on cliches and trite sayings to get them through life.

My thesis is that neither of these terms have any real meaning or basis -- they are just used to separate the "wheat from the chaff", and maintain the Normies dominance in society.

That's why this sub causes so much controversy -- it's a real threat to the prevailing norms. If incel ideology ever got more accepted, and its truths sunk in more, you might see a backlash ... to the point the "confident" Normies start looking a lot less cool, and a lot more silly (which I've always thought to begin with).

shockinghillaryquote, /r/IncelReddit 16 Comments [8/16/2017 2:02:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 130634

[OP of "Chad nationalism"]

[The "virgin ram", from a "Middle eastern cuck" who is "saving for his 74 virgins", is contrasted to the "Chad plow", an "USA patriot" killing "Communists and niggers"]

driedupbong420, Reddit - r/Physical_Removal 17 Comments [8/16/2017 9:24:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 130623

Friendly reminder that animal agriculture is inherently unethical and abusive and consuming animal products is always an unethical decision regardless of if it is voluntary or not.

Stop making people think killing animals because they feel like is moral and ethical. Stop pandering to people’s comfort and feelings by saying it’s perfectly good and ethical to abuse and slaughter others out of personal choice. There is no good excuse to support it except for out of dire necessity or complete lack of alternatives.


veganerudition, but broccoli (via Tumblr) 11 Comments [8/16/2017 2:00:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Salami

Quote# 130648

Sad to see the history and culture of our great country being ripped apart with the removal of our beautiful statues and monuments. You can't change history, but you can learn from it. Robert E Lee, Stonewall Jackson - who's next, Washington, Jefferson? So foolish! Also the beauty that is being taken out of our cities, towns and parks will be greatly missed and never able to be comparably replaced!

Donald Trump, Twitter 14 Comments [8/17/2017 9:25:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: DChan87

Quote# 130665

DemsArePerverted • in a few seconds

The Democrat Party is filled with traitors. Anyone who has voted for a Democrat in the past 10 years should be rounded up and sprayed with automatic rifle fire, or perhaps Zyklon B.

DemsArePerverted, Wonkette 12 Comments [8/17/2017 11:40:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: DiarrheaMan

Quote# 130590

An Imam in Zurich has been arrested after allegedly calling for non-practicing Muslims to be burned and killed.

The Ethiopian Imam, who was charged on August 2 of a number of other offences, including posting violent images of killings on Facebook and sharing them with people, and of working as an imam without authorisation.

Swiss prosecutors have now demanded the Imam is expelled from the country, with a 15-year ban on returning. They also want him to face an 18-month suspended sentence.

Complaints about the alleged hate speech reportedly go back to November 2016, when police raided the An-Nur mosque in Winterthur after being sent evidence of his radical speeches. Four people were arrested, including the Imam.

The mosque was then shut down in June this year.

In one speech, the unnamed Imam is said to have called on worshippers to expel Muslims who did not pray regularly.

In a statement, Swiss prosecutors said: ‘In his homily of Oct. 21, 2016, in the An’Nur Mosque, he is accused among other things of calling for expelling Muslims who do not pray in the community, and even burning them and killing them in their homes if they still refuse.’

He then apparently said that those who refused to practice Islam even after being expelled should be burned and killed in their homes.

Police reportedly arrested 10 people in connection to a brutal attack on two Muslims suspected of being whistleblowers in the Imam’s case.

Ethiopian Imam, Metro 1 Comments [8/16/2017 6:16:16 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 130628

DemsArePerverted whitroth • in a few seconds

Turing was a pervert. Those who desire to peg another dude in the ass should stay celibate.

DemsArePerverted, Wonkette 13 Comments [8/16/2017 2:02:18 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: DiarrheaMan

Quote# 13491

Bah! This is an example of Pharasee, not a real Christian. Real Christians aren’t so stupid to not know that someday Halloween will fall upon Sunday. And you guys might as well back off of Christians, people have been attacking Christian (don’t think that the times of Christiandom are any different) for 2000 years so give us a break! If you want an example of people attacking Christianity in America, look no further than this site! People continually attack the saying of Merry Christmas! Good greif! Get your hands off of trying to beat up Christians!

Gunny, Stupid Evil Bastard 22 Comments [8/2/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Les

Quote# 130619

Cause drawing pictures of living things is haram.

I used to like watching Akira and other cartoons when I was younger but then got told by my teacher to grow up and fear Allah.

I was also fanatic about comics, but they also got burnt when I started practising.

But even before practising, I kinda kept it low about these hobbies, cause it wasn't the "cool" thing to do.

My friends used to rib me about these things.

-Jibril-, Ummah 8 Comments [8/16/2017 8:09:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130620

You're not meant to watch any movies, TV shows etc. that go against Islamic principles. Like for instance a Hollywood movies got all sorts of things deemed haram, but an Islamic based production wouldn't have Music etc. and such.

The purpose should be educational first and foremost with a bit of entertainment in a halal manner.

I think we all know it's haram, but again it's an issue related to weakness for haram things of the dunya.

Constant Hope, Ummah 9 Comments [8/16/2017 8:09:08 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130621

Okay You guys need to realize that Lolicon does not mean lust after people that are underage. It does not mean lust after those who are prepubescent(this is where wolfen fucked up). It is no different than having a preference in women(i forgot whos aid that).

I am easilly described as a Lolicon. I like young looking, underdeveloped women. Is this wrong? Some might think so. But some people think getting circumsized is incredibly wrong to do as well.

Hell, my girlfriend is tiny as hell. She's 5'4 105 lbs, has a small chest, and over all just looks like she's about 14. I love her for this. She looks like a little girl. She's older than me though(wow, scary). Is this wrong of me to like a girls appearance that looks under 14?

My friend Kimmie looks like she's about 12. 5'0 90 some odd lbs... virtually little chest. Is it wrong for someone to find her attractive? She's 19 now btw.

We don't care about the age of the girl. If you are shown a picture of a girl and are asked "is she hot?"... does it matter how old she is to find her attractive or not? I've seen some 14 yo's that look like they're 24. 5'8 D cups(US standard), very very attractive looking to most people. Hell I have friends like that. 16 or so and look in their mid 20's. Guys ask me "who's your friend, she's fucking gorgeous"... then I tell them that she's only 16 and they're like "fuck...". Is it wrong to find her attractive just because she's underage? Is it wrong for me to find my girlfriend attractive because SHE LOOKS UNDERAGE?

This is ONLY pertaining to real people at the moment too, let alone fucking drawings. "this girl is young and cute and is sexually attractive to me"... "Fuck she's only 13? Oh well, she's still hawt".

The big difference is action. If I find a 13 year old girl sexually attractive... will I act upon it(and despite the joking that goes on between me and my friends, I wouldn't)? This is no different than ANY AGE though. "I find this 23 yr. old girl attractive... I'm going to rape her" other than what may be considered the morallity of raping a child, it is no different than raping a girl of age... except maybe worse since she might get pregnant.

So those of you saying "OMG lolicon is bad, you should all go to hell" Fuck you. Fuck you and fuck everything you think. Fuck you for thinking you can persecute us just because we find something attractive that you don't. It's like saying "you people like black women? you should all die for liking black women you sick fucks!" or somthing to that scale. I find this amusing since how many people find Asian women attractive on these forums. AND MANY of them have very child like bodies(cough cough... Aya MATSUDA>>> Maki Gotoh, etc. etc. etc.)

Again, fuck you all for prosecuting us for something we merely find attractive.

Geez Crack, that reads like NAMBLA propaganda. Maybe you should like, reword that a bit? X_X Cause it's a little extreme. o_O

No, because I hate idiotic persecution.

How would you feel if people started going off on Homosexuals? If you're a homosexual, you're a sick fuck and I hope you die. All homosexual shit on TV shouldn't be showed! I hope that fucker that was running for president and all people like him die. That's not freedom of expression, that's being a sick fuck.

How the fuck is that any different?

CrackPr0n-EET-, Megatokyo Forums 8 Comments [8/16/2017 1:59:47 PM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 130611

Okay,... I’ve been holding my tongue on this issue for a long, ...long time and it has NOTHING to do with whether a “Trump” has served in the military or not.

To begin with, that argument is a “non sequitur.” I AM a Retired US Marine Major, so please permit me: The Rand Corporation did a study and reported there are somewhere between 3,000 and 6,000 (if I remember the figure correctly) “transgenders” serving in the Active US Armed Forces. The study did NOT include members of the US National Guard or the Reserve Components of the Regular Services, i.e, US Army, USMC, US Navy, and US Air Force. The “transgenders” are those who identify as the opposite sex; ...cross-dress up at night out in town, in the barracks or in their off-base quarters, in attire opposite their birth sex? That said, here’s where this issue gets complicated: Do any of you readers here think that the US Armed Forces, vis a vis, the American Taxpayer should pay for “gender reassignment surgeries?” Gender reassignment surgeries can cost around $132,000 per. Added to that, is the cost AND time spent for follow-up $1200 per month hormone therapy treatment and hours AND hours of counseling by DoD Doctors and Psychologists at whatever base to which they are assigned.

And with the post surgery “down-time,” these individuals would be for upwards of 240 days, in a “Non-Deployable” status. So, who takes the place of the Marine Infantryman (MOS 0331), now a “Reassigned Transgendered Male,” who was scheduled to go afloat, but now can’t, with the Amphibious Readiness Group-Landing Force of a Marine Expeditionary Unit because “he” is having post-op complications? What happens when the trans-individual Marine has post-surgery physical complications and is afloat with the Navy; or in some instance, the individual happens to be a Soldier or Airman stationed with US Armed Forces in Germany or South Korea? What happens if a reassigned trans-individual has psychological complications in dealing with their condition and their new “sex” while deployed elsewhere in the world... let’s say, in Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean... or Adak, Alaska... or Reykjavik, Iceland?

Also, do we give these individual “special dispensation” from serving in these duty stations? Who’s the service member who has to take their place in these sometimes “hardship duty stations?” Your son or your daughter? Now if a guy or a gal wishes to play dress-up, “Play House” or play the role of “Buckeroo Banzai” in the barracks or wherever, they can have at it, for all I’m concerned. During my service time as a Commanding Officer or Executive Officer of a Company and Battalion, I’ve gotten worse Monday morning reports from the Barracks Duty NCO after many, many payday weekends!

Trust me. But when we go “down the rabbit hole” to taxpayer-funded reassignment surgeries in our Armed Forces, we are embarking on a truly wasteful and unnecessary venture. How many transgenders will seek the opportunity for taxpayer and “free” gender reassignment surgery? Do we give this costly and time consuming surgery to “Private Joseph P. Schmuckatella USMC” because all of a sudden he “thinks” he is a girl and wants to become “Josephine?” Do we allow others to enlist, get the surgery and then all of a sudden, it seems, they “can’t handle the military” because of “psychological issues?” This whole “transgenders serving in the military” issue is pure “PC” nonsense... of course there are gays and transgenders in the military.

There always has been.... we were not always sure who they were; sometimes one could make a pretty good guess though,.... no homophobia or transphobia here.... just plain horse sense with regard to who pays for gender reassignment surgeries. Now, everyone wants to point to Chris (”Kristen”) Beck, the RETIRED Navy SEAL who was a “transgender” while serving in the Navy. All well and good. I honestly thank him for his service and his heroics. I don’t know if he had the gender reassignment surgery after he retired to become a “female,” but I know he lied when he said he was a member or SEAL Team 6 when it took out Osama Bin Ladin.

He actually retired about six months before that expedition. I served twenty years as a Commissioned Officer with Fleet Marine Force Units in the 2nd Marine Division, 1st and 2nd Marine Aircraft Wings; 1st Marine Expeditionary Brigade and with I MEF in the Persian Gulf (Ops Desert Sheild - Desert Storm). I went through the Officers Candidate Course at Quantico, VA and served as the Logistics Officer (Special Staff - 4) for the Recruit Training Regiment at Marine Corps Recruit Depot, Parris Island, SC. I experienced “becoming a Marine” as an Officer Candidate and personally witnessed the magnificent tranformation of fine American youth, male and female, to “becoming US Marines” at MCRD, Parris Island. As Commanders and Marine Officers, we are responsible for FIRST, the “MIssion” and SECONDLY, “Troop Welfare.” Added to that, we have a responsibility for “Unit Cohesion” and folks, this PC nonsense is NOT included in that part of our responsibilities.

This is not a game or “social experiment.” Marines and other Armed Forces Military Members lives are on the line here. Having said all this: Please let me direct you to Dr. Paul McHugh’s, from Johns Hopkins, study about “Gender Dysphoria.” You can google it. He has studied “Gender Dysphoria” for OVER 40 years. He is dead set against Gender Reassignment Surgery. And parents are doing a great disserve to their chlldren when they let them go down that road. Why? Upwards of 40 - 48% of transgenders attempt suicide. Dr. McHugh’s salient point: “Males will never truly become females and females will never truly become males.” So, do we want those who are having psychological issues on the front lines in combat alongside fellow Marines or Soldiers with fully loaded arms? You be the judge of Dr. McHugh’s work and determine for yourself if there’s not something wrong with “trangenders” entering our military.

Joe Marine 76, Free Republic 8 Comments [8/16/2017 8:07:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130645

Isn't it amazing that a single attempt at a peaceful gathering of a few hundred pro-whites caused the biggest political shitstorm in years?


2/ Like 500 people lol! Looks like they really pressed on the nerve of what terrifies the global capitalist system, eh?


3/ They don't even COVER violent communist/antifa gatherings(they cover for them though), because they are not a challenge to the system.

nontolerantman, Twitter 10 Comments [8/17/2017 5:54:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 130537


The boy said he looks up to drag queens. "I love them because they do what they want to do and they're not afraid to do it," Nemis said. "My friends at school think Lactatia's very courageous. She's really good at dancing, they also think that she's really good at playing video games and stuff like that."

EDITOR’S NOTE: Did you really think the LGBTQ agenda was about “tolerance and equality” for gay people? Nope, the real target and aim of the LGBTQ movement has always been the children. Hitler was so successful not only be he persuaded the German people. Hitler succeeded because the Hitler Youth he started in the early 1920’s yielded the harvest of an entire generation he followed his teachings in the late 1930’s. You want real control? Control the children. Evil genius works like that.

“I’ve been wearing my sister’s tutu since I was like threes and fours, even like twos, and I’ve been dancing around in my little pink dresses and stuff, so yeah I think I’ve had Lactatia inside me since I was born, that’s why I love that song ‘Born This Way,'” Nemis said in the video.

The boy took on the idea that children (at age 8!) should not even know what a “drag queen” is. “I know people would like go up to their parents and tell them that they want to be a drag queen, and then their parents would be like, ‘You shouldn’t even know what that is.'”

The boy’s mother described the whole experience as “overwhelming — you feel overwhelmed by pride that your child is expressing themselves, and showing the world, and it’s being so well received, and she’s pretty good at what she does.”

Yes, the mother referred to her son as “she.” This gender confusion ran through Nemis’s own view of himself. While he identified as a “diva” over and over again, he seemed unclear as to whether or not a man can be a “diva.”

Don't forget to RECOMMEND. Lets get the Truth out so that Light may shine bright in this dark place and Jesus Christ may be glorified.Even if the discussion is closed, please still RECOMMEND.

Lady Checkmate, Disqus - Faith & Religion 16 Comments [8/16/2017 6:11:11 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 130643

Carnists losing their minds about a few Nazis walking around together... Meanwhile they are gorging their faces on the holocaust of animals.

Vegan Revolution , Twitter  9 Comments [8/17/2017 6:13:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 130618

[From "Heather Heyer: Woman Killed in Road Rage Incident was a Fat, Childless 32-Year-Old Slut"]

The woman killed in yesterday’s road rage incident has been identified as Heather Heyer, a 32-year-old overweight slob with no children.

Here’s five fat facts you need to know.

1) She was Fat and a Drain on Society
Despite feigned outrage by the media, most people are glad she is dead, as she is the definition of uselessness. A 32-year-old woman without children is a burden on society and has no value.

Due to female privilege, and the fact that they do virtually nothing their entire lives, women live an average of 5 years longer than men. The average female lifespan is 81 years. That means for 49 more years, this fat slob would have been leeching off of men’s work.

Childless women are black hole vortexes of public money and energy.

Had she not died yesterday, hundreds of thousands of dollars would have been spent on propping-up this gross creature who had failed to do her most basic duty – her only real duty, in fact – and reproduce.

Having no children at that age, it can be assumed that she had multiple abortions, and was thus herself a child murderer.

2) Too Fat to Dodge a Dodge
A Dodge Challenger is a fast car. Fat people like Heather fatty fat are slow, slow, slow.

In the video, you can clearly see that most people dodge the charging Dodge. Heather was unable to dodge the Dodge, because she was “just too fucking fat to really move much at all,” according to one observer.


3) Protesting White Men
She was attending the rally to protest white men.

Her social media history shows that she sought the complete abolition of the white race.


4) Driver was a Straight Player
The driver of the of the car, James Fields, was a hardcore player, and sources claim that he didn’t give a fuck.

Despite the cool demeanor he shows in his social media profile pictures, it appears that road rage got the best of him.

Though many people are expressing outrage after the crash, there are also many wondering if the outrage is not simply player hatred, rather than actually concern over the death of some useless sow.


5) Publicity Stunt by Dodge?
The same day of the crash, Dodge was promoting a “Roadkill Nights” event.

This is a screenshot from roadkill.com, the site they were using to promote that event:

It is extremely coincidental that Dodge would be promoting “Roadkill Nights” the same day as a driver of their vehicle roadkilled a fat woman.

This incident is extremely good viral advertising for Dodge, and I have no doubt that they will start advertising the Challenger as a “fatty smasher.” They may also use the slogan “Dodge this!”

Andrew Anglin, Daily Stormer 40 Comments [8/16/2017 8:08:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 22
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 130644

[From "“Hate on Many Sides” – CNN is Pissed Trump Didn’t Denounce White Nationalism"]

He outright refused to disavow.

People saying he cucked are shills and kikes.

He did the opposite of cuck.

He refused to even mention anything to do with us.

When reporters were screaming at him about White Nationalism he just walked out of the room.

Andrew Anglin, Daily Stormer 13 Comments [8/17/2017 6:14:19 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 130640

If i cant have a normal life, why should i get a job if i can live with my parents being a neet?

why should i go outside?, I don't like to watch happy couples walking

Tourijo , R/incels  10 Comments [8/16/2017 9:26:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 130610

My whole life, there is always some new issue that has become the new normal. The right never pushes back. The country as we know it is lost. The Roman Empire survived hundreds of years after Caesar effectively killed off the Republic form of government. Our country/civilization may or may not continue with all these constant changes.

But it can’t remain a republic for much longer. Our founders have said our form of government is only suitable for a moral people. Numerous founders said that. But here is one quote from John Adams, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

A country that lets children self identify their gender isn’t the straw the broke the camels back imo. It’s just additional evidence that God has removed his blessing from us and has turned our countrymen over to their own debased minds. Clearly a majority of this country either endorses evil or is silent and do not oppose it. Take your pick.

Abortion, adultery, fornication, envy, greed, stealing via socialism, lying and now the LGBTQ agenda. Those in favor of what was once thought clearly immoral now outnumber those who do not. If you think it is not so, recall Bill Clinton and the blue dress incident 20 years ago. His approval numbers improved iirc.

Tyranny is the inevitable result. MAGA is just a fantasy.

BJ1, Free Republic 9 Comments [8/16/2017 8:06:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 130642

(FSTDT/RSTDT twofer)

Just my thoughts on the matter.
Look around the news these days.
College's teach classes that whites are privileged and racists by the very act of being born white.
They are barring them from certain places on campus.
The same is happening with Maleness and christianity (not judaism or islam though)
Christians are denigrated openly and joyously. It's fashionable to hate them.
In today's world, if you are a straight white male, you're the most atrocious thing walking the planet now and responsible for everything that is wrong with the world.

So when these disenfranchised youths look around and see all this, its not hard to see them being lured to KKK, Et.al ...
It shouldnt be too hard to see this, after all, it is exactly what we have been saying about attacking muslims and creating more extremists.
When you start painting broad sections of people as all evil because of one thing or another, it leads no where good.

ziegler, Ars Technica 8 Comments [8/17/2017 6:13:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: zyr

Quote# 130616

The latest from the Twilight Zone, otherwise known as modern-day America.

Mick Williams:
Even a talented imagination like Rod's would never have foreseen how his dystopia episodes would actually come to pass.

Lady Checkmate:
Mick, I love it!
The only sad (?) thing is that it's accurate...the end times are playing out just as God's word says it would and the enemy has so confused the lost that they are being led away to the slaughter (laughing, drinking, whoremongering and proudly foolishly pumping their fists at God...the only living God).
They have NO idea that they are slaves to sin and the end of sin is death. My heart breaks for them brother.

Mick Williams:
Narrow is the true path, and few that find it.

Mick Williams, Disqus - Faith & Religion 17 Comments [8/16/2017 8:08:27 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Jocasta

Quote# 130622

Rules are one thing, but this goes beyond censorship. This is basically saying, we are wrong to think that something is attractive, and by thinking it... we are bad people.

Shit like this pisses me off...

I do care about "freedom of speech" or "right to expression", but when it comes to sick shit like this, your rights to sharing your fantasies end. There's a point where it goes too far. This isn't artwork anymore, it's some twisted fantasy given the light of day.

"I agree with freedom of expression... unless it's something I don't like" is basically what that comment is. Like I fucking said earlier, it has nothing to do with age, it has to do with what is found attractive. My girlfriend looks underage... so according to you this is "sick shit" for me to be attracted to her? Oh, I've imagined having all kinds of different sex with her... are these twisted fantasies that I've thought about?

What part of that don't you people understand? A character is a grade schooler in a certain game, and the main character has sex with them. Would it be any different if the character looked exactly the same... acted exactly the same... and was in college? I bet you people would like the character just as much either way.

It's a pointless reasoning that you guys are giving. "Child porn is bad". How young? Okay, let's go by US standards with 18. That's fine right? Okay a 17 year old poses naked. Everyone assumes she's 18. Are you now a sick freak for liking the picture because you thought she was 18? What if she was 16 and you thought she was 18? Are you a sick freak?

I've repeated the same thing three times basically and not a single person has even spoken about it in how it's not wrong or why it is wrong. In games it's called trying to hit target audiences. What, it's okay for a company to make crap ass games to make money featuring nothing but killing and blood... but if an ADULT game that is sold to ONLY ADULTS, has a character that looks young then it's wrong?

Fuck your double standard bull shit.

Fuck you for telling me it's wrong to like a young looking character, fuck you for telling me it's wrong to like young looking girls.

Every single fucking one of you return back to "AGE" when time and time again we tell you it has nothing to fucking do with age. So fuck off and stop trying to preach as if you're better.

EDIT: because I reread and wanted to add.

What you think about things have no fucking bearing on what others should or should not be allowed to do. I.E. if someone is into eating his partners feces... as vile as it may seem to you, are you saying he has no right to do it? If someone enjoys being urinated on by his partner, are you saying he has no right to do it? Putting penut butter on his/her privates and letting his/her pet lick the peanut butter, no right?

You need to realize that ones own personal rights is to do with he and her enjoy... AS LONG AS they do not intrude on the rights of another person without their permission.

Then we look at what we can and cannot do. Who hasn't thought about going out and just shooting stuff up. Who hasn't found the appeal of being an international spy like James Bond, or being a war hero. Being a great quarter back, rescuing the President, saving the world.

That's what games let us do isn't it? Do things we cannot do in reality. Games give us the ability to do the things we only wish we could do in real life. So we play them. We get satisfaction out of them living small dreams that otherwise would be left unfulfilled.

So what if someone enjoys younger looking girls. Playing games is a way too feed that dream without harming anyone in real life. You're just as guilty of it for playing Ace Combat 5 because you want to be a pilot. Only... YOU personally think their dream is sick. Well fuck you, because it's their dream, let them fucking enjoy it.

CrackPr0n-EET-, Megatokyo Forums 4 Comments [8/16/2017 1:59:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 130641

Hi dyanaprajna2011, most are like you and do not understand Paul very well. The Apostle Paul was the greatest and most knowledgeable Apostle concerning the Spiritual understanding of the Law:

2Pe 3:15-17
(15) And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
(16) As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
(17) Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.

You see dyanaprajna2011, even the Apostle Peter recognized the special WISDOM that had been given to Paul, which LAWLESS men would then distort and twist.

Now, you have fallen INTO the category of being one of those whom Peter was speaking about. Take for example the first Scripture you referenced in 2 Cor 12:16. You have presented that Paul was lying and using deceit, even as being so bold as to openly admit to this sin. Shame on you! The Apostle Paul was speaking of how he did not "hold out his hand" as the churches of this world do today, and ask for them to take care of him. This was a crafty move on his part, to not let them have any reason to accuse him of having "monetary" MOTIVES in his presentation of the Gospel to them. That totally disarmed any accusations that would say he was preaching to them for profit...and that was very crafty of him. You should apologize for even suggesting Paul was a liar and a deceitful person. KB

Ken Brown, Religious Forums 5 Comments [8/16/2017 9:28:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 18800

When we look to the Black Book of Satan; The Al-Jilwah, we find in Chapter IV, Father Satan says: "I have allowed the creation of four substances, four times and four corners; because they are necessary things for creatures."

This is a description of the DNA molecule! Anyone who is familar with the composition and structure of DNA knows the molecule is spiral shaped, and coiled like a SERPENT. The DNA also has rungs like a ladder. The rungs of the ladder are made up of FOUR compounds, called bases. The bases are adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine. (Abbreviated A, C, T and G). These FOUR nucleotides can combine in pairs, in sequences of limitless variety and are bound into place.

DNA IS THE BASIS OF LIFE! Without DNA, life would not exist. The Serpent is the symbol of healing for both the body and the soul. The Serpent is also the symbol of medicine. The medical caduceus has two serpents entwined around a staff. This can be seen in nearly every doctor's office and symbolizes the kundalini, which is of Satan.

Maxine Dietrich, Joy of Satan 33 Comments [1/1/2006 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | top