1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 25 30 40 | bottom
Quote# 141842

The Anti Christ is a spirit that men surrender to who, like the gentleman who answered previously, is anti Jesus Christ. Anyone who denies that Jesus Christ (God) came in the flesh to this earth, died on the cross for our sins, and rose again through the power of the Holy Spirit has the spirit of the AntiChrist. For what the Anti Christ calls for men to receive basically that there is no God, and if there is no God, then there is no heaven, thus there is no forgiveness of our sins, real peace or joy, and that there is no greater Creator who loves us enough to create us, intercede for us, or even die for us- even though the evidence for God’s existence is evident in nature around us. For we know these three things for sure:

1.) Nature wasn't created by men/mankind. We know this because this makes absolutely no sense.

For here’s the new question: Which came first? Nature or mankind? Because if mankind came first then he would still be floating in space because there would have been no earth to stand on because mankind didn’t make it exist first. The only other way for man to have existed is that a Creator greater then mankind himself would have had to place him here…Then if nature existed first, then how did it get here apart from mankind existing? Or, where did men get the materials to build the objects to build all of nature?

2.) For the evolutionists: if it wasn’t created by men, then it definitely wasn’t created by animals.

3.) “Big Bangs” are all the same. If they (huge explosions) don’t produce life now but rather destruction, why would they produce life ever?

Terrence Harris, Quora 5 Comments [1/5/2019 10:27:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 141873

I am what most would consider quite religious,, but I will tell you right her and now, without question or doubt, that God is NOT fair, nor do you want Him to be!

If God we’re fair, he would condemn even the most religious of us to an eternity in the pits of hell! We are sinners, each and every one of us. God on the other hand is perfection, and the two cannot exist with each other. Yet, He is also extremely willing to forgive us even the most severe of our sins.

When God extends that forgiveness to someone, the “stains” of his/her sin are washed white with the blood of the lamb (the Lamb is Jesus Christ, who lived a perfect life and died for our sins so that we don’t have to) and are no longer visible, even to Him. This is why it is said that the only way to God is through his Son. Jesus Christ is the only way to achieve full forgiveness of any sin, and so Jesus is the only way into heaven. Otherwise, God would be fair, and that would be most detrimental to every human who has ever lived, for none would be granted everlasting life.

No, God is NOT fair! He is merciful!

You have obviously been thinking about this question for a while. I would strongly suggest that you meet some Christian friends who will be able to help you with the many questions that we’ve all had about God. He/she will be willing to explain things to you whenever something doesn’t quite make sense, or even when there seems to be a contradiction.

I will be praying to the Lord that you soon find your way, friend!

Joseph McDaniels, Quora 7 Comments [1/7/2019 5:29:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 141844

Last night some of our regional Parma nationalists hung up a sign that said “Mom and dad. The rest is faggotry”.

From FN’s facebook page: “Grazie a Dio non siamo catto-comunisti liberali.
E all’inizio del 2019 possiamo anche noi gridare al miracolo, anche a Parma, città sempre più alla
deriva, i bimbi nascono da genitori dello stesso sesso, e pensare che sino a pochi anni fa, dalla
nascita del genere umano, i bimbi venivano procreati da un uomo e una donna e non da un mammo…”

The preceding paragraph basically states, “thank God we aren’t godless liberals and kids come from a man and a woman…”

Forza Nuova Parma, Forza Nuova USA 10 Comments [1/5/2019 10:28:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: hydrolythe

Quote# 141846

God is great and God is good

Christmas Day has come and gone, but the Birth of Jesus will linger on. For every child of God we celebrate the Birth of Jesus each day that we live.

How wonderful to know that God lives within our heart.

As we begin a New Year let's always remember what God has done for each of us. We try to make resolutions to do better, go on a diet, and so many other things. The most important thing we could ever do is accept Jesus as our Lord and Saviour and live for Him.

If He comes today are you ready to meet Him? Would Heaven be your home? It is so important to know for sure that you are saved.

God forgives all sin no matter how big or how small. The good part is He remembers them no more.

"As far as the east is from the west, so far hath he removed our transgressions from us." Psalms 103: 12.

Satan will try to bring them back to our mind, but think of God's Mercy and Grace. God is greater than anything we have to go through.

God is great and God is good.

Happy New Year everyone.

Patsy Lambert, Newberry Observer 13 Comments [1/5/2019 10:29:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 141849

A detailed criticism of Recolonization Theory has previously been published by McIntosh, Edmondson, and Taylor, and another by Holt.

The principal error of this view is that it starts from supposed scientific anomalies, such as the fossil record, rather than from Scripture. This has led to the proposals among some Recolonizers, but not all, that there must be gaps in the genealogies recorded in Genesis 5 and 11, even though there is no need for such gaps. Indeed the suggestion of gaps in these genealogies causes further doctrinal problems.

Even the views of those Recolonizers who do not expand the genealogies contain possible seeds of compromise. Because the Recolonizers accept the geologic column, and because the Middle East has a great deal of what is called Cretaceous rock, it follows that the Middle East would need to be submerged after the Flood, at the very time of the Tower of Babel events in Genesis 11. This has led some of the Recolonizers to speculate that the Ark actually landed in Africa, and therefore, that continent was the host to the events of Genesis 11 and 12. This would seem to be a very weak position exegetically and historically. Such exegetical weaknesses led Professor Andy McIntosh and his colleagues to comment, “Their science is driving their interpretation of Scripture, and not the other way round.”

Paul F. Taylor, Answers in Genesis 9 Comments [1/5/2019 10:30:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 141815

we are living in a spiritually sterile l materialistic, faithless, Soulless, Godless drunken, drug infested, sexually perverse, Men marrying men-Age of darkness and ignorance and aggressive disbelief and irreverence for anything truly pure Holy clean and true! That the laws of light, life and God are now subverted that those atheists think now that Good is Bad and bad is good! Yep! T'is truly the End of days!

Even Michael Jackson knew the truth of it as he was always singing- you know I'm BAD! I'm bad I'm really really bad! And everyone's going -

Good! Good! Good! He! He!?

David Hague, Quora 8 Comments [1/4/2019 5:08:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Denizen

Quote# 141818

Gay activists are coming after Christian churches next…and it’s already happening

November 19, 2018 (LifeSiteNews) – Over the past decade, attacks on Canada’s Christian communities by LGBT activists have escalated significantly. In Alberta, Education Minister David Eggen is threatening to defund and possibly shut down religious schools that do not accept Gay-Straight alliance clubs. Canada’s Supreme Court recently ruled against Trinity Western University, a private Christian institution in British Columbia, for having students agree to a lifestyle contract upon enrollment. And of course, attempts to force schools to teach gender ideology are taking place simultaneously in nearly every province across the country.

I’ve seen many Canadian Christians post articles describing these events on social media, often accompanied by the million dollar question: “What’s next?” I suspect that I’ve known the answer to that question for some time, but recent events in Ontario indicate that it could happen sooner than I’d thought. The potential catalyst is a story that has been reported on breathlessly by Canadian media for just over a week now.

A Bowmanville woman, Kimberley Mills, was attending the Calvary Baptist Church in Oshawa, Ontario. Calvary Baptist, like most churches (and all Christian churches for the past two thousand years prior to a few decades ago) holds to the traditional biblical teaching on sexual morality. Mills, however, has been in a relationship with her partner Meghan Fowler for several years. Despite the many liberal churches she could have attended that would have been more than thrilled to celebrate her relationship, Mills chose to attend a church that adheres to what the Bible says about sexuality, and even to serve as youth leader.

After sharing with people in her church that she was in a long-term same-sex relationship, she was removed from the membership rolls of Calvary Baptist Church in November, and received a letter from the church leadership informing her of this fact. This is standard practice for many churches: Membership is voluntary, but members must abide by the rules of the church community. As reported by the Toronto Star:

“It is a very serious matter to remove a member for discipline as you will note in the 1 Corinthians 5:5 text, and our hearts are broken over it,” said the letter signed by Dr. Tim Wagner, deacon chair.
Representatives from the church released a followup statement to say that everyone is welcome to attend Sunday services, regardless of whether they are members. However, the church does have the option to remove someone from membership — a “voluntary association of like-minded individuals.”
“We love and care for everyone since we are all made in the Image of God,” said the Calvary Baptist Church statement. “Those who choose to become members of Calvary Baptist Church share our theological and doctrinal beliefs and agree to live in accordance with those beliefs. When an individual ceases to hold those beliefs or live in accordance with them, as has recently happened, that individual may be removed from membership but always remains welcome to attend our services and other programs.”

The letter informed her that she was “living in disobedience to the Scriptures,” which made Mills very upset. The Star noted that this conflict “thrust [her] into the role of gay rights advocate,” and quoted Mills explaining that, “It’s clear that something needs to change. I feel that God designed me the way I am and He’s going to love me the way I am.” She promptly went public on social media, and says she has been (predictably) receiving much public support, as well as getting many messages from pastors informing her that they were in complete approval of her relationship. Again, it is difficult to understand why Mills did not choose to attend a church presided by over one of those pastors to begin with.

Mills now says that she had “started to be concerned about coming out at the church when a sermon took a strong stand against homosexuality,” and “felt like she wasn’t able to be true to herself while at church.” (This is understandable, as biblical churches do not exist to help people feel “true to themselves,” but rather speak of the need for repentance and obedience to God.) Mills had several discussions with church leaders that she found unsatisfactory, and instead decided to leave the church—“but she plans to continue speaking out about her experience.”

That experience has already attracted the attention of one gay activist, who has now put Calvary Baptist Church in his crosshairs:

Oshawa community advocate Mac Moreau has launched a letter-writing campaign asking the Canada Revenue Agency to review the charitable status of Calvary Baptist Church. As a registered charity, churches receive significant tax breaks from the provincial and federal government — with the requirement that churches devote all of their resources to charity.

“The church has allowed its resources to be used for activities that promote hate and intolerance,” said Moreau. “If you are going to promote hate and intolerance, you shouldn’t receive benefits from the Canadian government that all Canadians contribute to.”

Moreau said the letter — and potentially ensuing CRA assessment — isn’t meant to close the Calvary Baptist Church. The aim is to support other gay parishioners who are feeling pushed out of their churches, and to hopefully serve as a warning to all churches that preach intolerance.

“This isn’t meant to destroy a church family,” said Moreau, who attended the Calvary Baptist Church as a child and said he later left over concerns about the messages of obedience and intolerance. “This is simply to say in this day-and-age, when you’re receiving benefits from the public purse, this is not acceptable.”
This will be the next strategic move on the part of Canadian LGBT activists. Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government has already placed an ideological litmus test (which includes LGBT issues as well as abortion) as a prerequisite for gaining access to the Canada Summer Jobs Program, and soon enough LGBT activists will turn their attention to those churches (and other religious institutions) that still hold to the traditional biblical teaching on sexuality. Perhaps Kimberley Mills will be the catalyst, or perhaps somebody else will. But it will happen, and probably sooner rather than later.

LGBT activists will soon demand that governments strip charitable status from any church or institution that disagrees with their ideology of sexuality, and will accuse any politician who declines to do so of being a homophobe or a transphobe. They will claim that these churches make the lives of LGBT people miserable, and that they should be condemned by all people of goodwill. Any good that these churches do, they will say, is vastly outweighed by their fundamental bigotry. And if the past is any indication, Canada’s spineless politicians will fall into line and do just that.

Jonathan Van Maren, LifeSite News 11 Comments [1/4/2019 5:09:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: I

Quote# 141812

There is also the influence of the communist BBC from which the Irish get most of their news. I have always been a proud Irishman my parents were born in Ireland and most of my relatives are still there but after the Irish voted to kill their babies and their future I took all my Irish books about history , culture and folklore and threw them all in the dust bin along with any Irish flags I had. I no longer celebrate St. Patrick’s day because I am ashamed to be Irish.

John O'Neill, Disqus 15 Comments [1/4/2019 5:07:34 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 141822

I’m sure there are “dating” sites for homosexuals, although gay men are often just looking for quick sodomy. They just want to coerce approval from everyone. I’m sick of it!

Have the trannies sued for the right to misrepresent themselves on dating sites?

reaganaut1, Free Republic 12 Comments [1/4/2019 5:10:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 141817

In the wake of claims that so-called “fake news” helped turn voters against Hillary Clinton and toward Donald Trump in the last election, the term itself has become so overused that it is nearly meaningless. Trump uses the “fake news” label to deride the mainstream media and highlight their liberal bias, while the Democrats insist that “fake news” tricked many ordinary people into voting against their own interests. Since then, there has been much discussion concerning how to limit “fake news” — Canadian, German, and American politicians have all cited “fake news” as a concern that needs to be addressed.

As a pro-life activist, these sorts of discussions make me nervous. Not because I don’t think that any “fake news” exists — I see plenty of social media posts from obviously fake websites peddling obviously fictitious stories. What concerns me is the fact that I don’t trust government authorities or the mainstream media or the academic establishment to determine what is and is not “fake news.” Inevitably, this sort of thing will end up resulting in the censorship of views that progressives dislike.

Consider the current conversation on abortion, for example. How often are media sources actually willing to discuss what abortion is? Pro-lifers are portrayed as wild-eyed religious fanatics or fundamentalist throwbacks trying to control female sexuality, while abortion supporters are portrayed as liberty-loving reproductive rights warriors. But imagine if a newspaper simply printed photographs of the human being in the womb at each stage of development, from conception until birth, and asked questions about when it was ethical to end that life? Or imagine if journalists confronted politicians with the fact that abortion often involves doctors tearing the limbs from the bodies of pre-born children, and asked if this was a humane response to a crisis pregnancy?

This, of course, would never happen. Media discussions of abortion exclude any details of the procedure we’re actually talking about. When the Planned Parenthood videos were released, for example, the media immediately accused David Daleiden and his investigators of “deceptively editing” the footage. Let’s say, for the sake of the argument, that the media’s accusation had been correct. What about all those discussions about “crushing” the fetus? What about those abortionist panels that had audiences in stitches over stray eyeballs plopping into the doctor’s lap? What about the abortionist casually chatting about how she had to “pull off a leg or two” during abortions? Nobody was claiming that those videos were “deceptively edited,” because they obviously were not. So why did those — and many other — horrific revelations not make the news?

The reason is simple. The abortion industry has progressive politicians, the mainstream media, and much of academia running cover for their barbarism. The media assists them in the coverup of what actually takes place within the abortion industry, which is why bombshell videos of abused animals get nonstop coverage but casual discussions about crushing tiny human beings gets dismissed and the whistleblowers maligned and slandered. That’s also why it took a concentrated social media shaming campaign to get even the slightest bit of news coverage for the Kermit Gosnell trial, where America’s most prolific serial killer was being charged with murder. Some journalists openly admitted that they didn’t want to cover the trial because it made the abortion industry look bad.

If we want to see what abortion activists intend to do to free speech, all we have to do is look at Europe. Two Members of European Parliament have begun the process of attempting to criminalize pro-life views and assert that opposition to abortion is “a form of violence.” The French Broadcasting Council and the French State Council actually banned a beautiful video called “Dear Future Mom,” because it showcased happy, smiling children with Down syndrome telling parents not to worry, and that they loved their parents like any other child would. It was decided, however, that this video would make the thousands of mothers who decided to abort their child with Down syndrome feel bad, and thus it should be censored. Those who are willing to violently end the lives of pre-born children will think nothing of censoring the truth and restricting freedom of speech.

“Fake news” may be a problem, but it is a problem borne out of our divided society, where nobody can agree on what the truth is anymore — if “truth” even exists. When government bodies and academic institutions begin to discuss how to address “fake news,” you can be sure that they do not simply mean fabricated stories with no basis in fact. They also mean the truth about abortion, and a wealth of information that they find inconvenient to furthering their so-called progressive causes. Our media and our politicians assist in the coverup of some of humanity’s greatest crimes, inflicted on our own offspring. They are not committed to truth, and we must be very wary when they begin to pretend as if they are.

Jonathan Van Maren, LifeSite News 11 Comments [1/4/2019 5:09:04 AM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: I

Quote# 141551

This comment is nonsensical anyway.

First, from any standpoint, if there is a God, then He is eternal and cannot die. That's just part of the definition. He won't be much of a God if he can die (spiritually).
Second, if there is not a God, then He can't die, since He never lived. You can't die if you never were.
Third, there is a God, and He is eternal, so He cannot die. So God is NOT dead.
Fourth, the closest that God came to death was when God the Son died on the cross for our sins, but only His body died, not His being, and we all know what happened and the resurrection and so on.
Fifth, if one means like a fad, that is impossible too. Some may become atheists, but all will not.

But now this guy is dead, and he knows that he was wrong.

Lydia Church, Christian News Network 10 Comments [12/19/2018 11:14:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Bob J

Quote# 104977

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, a leader in the anti-immigrant movement, said during his Sunday radio program that it’s possible that a Hispanic majority in the U.S. could conduct an “ethnic cleansing.”

Kobach made his remarks in response to a caller who asked, “What happens, if you know your history, when one culture or one race or one religion overwhelms another culture or race?”

Claiming that immigrant rights groups are “calling for the return of the Spanish territory, which could be almost half of the United States,” the caller warned, “When one race or culture overwhelms another culture, they run them out or they kill them. And it’s a bigger issue than just being Democrats. And they know in numbers, once the numbers are so bad, they can pretty much do whatever they want to do.”

“What protects us in America from any kind of ethnic cleansing is the rule of law, of course,” Kobach responded. “And the rule of law used to be unassailable, used to be taken for granted in America. And now, of course, we have a president who disregards the law when it suits his interests. So, while I normally would answer that by saying, ‘Steve, of course we have the rule of law, that could never happen in America,’ I wonder what could happen. I still don’t think it’s going to happen in America, but I have to admit, things are strange and they are happening."

Kris Kobach, Right Wing Watch 29 Comments [11/29/2014 5:58:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: JeanP

Quote# 67630

Saying moderate Muslim is like saying moderate flesh eating bacteria or moderate serial killer.

SK, Moonbattery 37 Comments [11/16/2009 11:41:53 AM]
Fundie Index: -28
Submitted By: DevilsChaplain

Quote# 69040

Some twenty years of investigating claims that the the Earth rotates on an axis and orbits the Sun, and that the universe began evolving 15 billion years ago and is 15 billion light years thick, have left me without the slightest doubt:
a) That The Earth Is Not Moving;
b) That the Bible’s repeated declarations that it is the Sun that moves and not the Earth are absolutely accurate;
c) That the Big Bang Model ruling today’s cosmology is handcuffed to the Copernican Heliocentricity Model;
d) That both of these Models are built solely on contra-scientific assumptions held together by occult mathematics and fraudulent use of computerized technology
e) That those deceptive and vulnerable assumptions now undergird the entirety of modern man’s "knowledge"
f) That both the Heliocentricity and the Big Bang Models represent the fulfillment of a "creation scenario" of Kabbalic Judaism masquerading as "science"
g) That the purpose of this hidden religious agenda has been to destroy the "creation scenario" of the Bible and thereby destroy the credibility of the rest of the Bible right on through Jesus and the New Testament....
h) That the time for all who love truth over deception to give this issue their most careful and prayerful attention is now. This is especially true for all Christians who realize that their religion stands or falls on the the restoration of the absolute credibility of the Bible. This Biblical non-moving Earth issue alone can force that restoration and expose all the lies now connected with evolution-based false science (I Tim. 6:20,21).

Marshall Hall, Fixed Earth 76 Comments [12/26/2009 5:24:53 AM]
Fundie Index: 151

Quote# 90129

We need to remember What America "was." The founders had differing spiritual views, practices, and even so-called atheistic beliefs. However, not a single one would admit to homosexual relatiohips. Why not?

Simple: homosexual mental disorder, if promoted, would have destroyed America in a short few years, because there would be no new citizens!

"That" is the demonic goal behind homosexuality - eliminate human population. It is a demon-controlled mental disease, and Creator has just one answer for nations practicing it openly: Complete and utter destruction!

Look no further than Hebrew Scripture for His direct hand of destruction of at least two homosexual communities - the five cities of Sodom-Gomorrah, and the Israelite tribe of Benjamin, in Judges 19. For at least one sectarian community destroyed for homosexuality, Pompeii illustrates a perfect parallel to the Sodom-Gomorrah disaster. America is no small potato in the history of openly homosexual disease practice, but compared to the Cosmos, Earth is a mere speck, and Creator has names for ALL His stars, some so huge the Solar system would fit inside!

Make no mistake about this, homosexuality in America will bring complete destruction upon the entire nation. What to do? Pray for the Lord to show where you need to repent, and do it, then begin to pray and trust Him to come and show Himself in no uncertain terms before the homosexual disease consumes the nation. No "vote," no church campaign, no national day of prayer, and nothing else will divert this sure destruction.

One way to join with like minds is to join "If My People 2012." Personal, deep repentance is mandatory, and then daily walking and talking with Creator, and sharing the word. Remember, Abraham was promised No Destruction for Sodom-Gomorrah "IF" merely 5 righteous persons could be found in those five cities! That's just ONE, SINGLE person per city!

Are YOU that ONE?

Picklem, WND 63 Comments [10/16/2012 3:38:38 AM]
Fundie Index: 64

Quote# 8613

Dinosaurs the truth.

Few of these animals lived after the great flood, human expansion finally did away with them.

But still there are descendants of these creatures today living in the Democratic Republic of Congo. One of these animals resembles the huge Diplodocus it has a long neck and tail but rarer is a full grown Diplodocus able to lift its neck 40 meters into the air. The male's have small spikes running from the back of the head to the tip of its tale. Referred to as the Mokele-Mbembe or the blocker of rivers.

The finding of this animal would destroy the theory of evolution.

I will dedicate my life to finding these giants and become a Cryptozoologist

Cell, Christian Forums 25 Comments [12/13/2005 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 8

Quote# 139016

How the rightful heir to the throne of England can be restored to the throne.

I realized that since the legal system in the UK has the monarch give royal assent to laws passed, it would be impossible to use the system to change the monarchy.

Because of that, I propose that the secret organization, infiltrates the US government having members of the organization becoming President and members of Congress, so that the US government can use the CIA to kidnap a child heir to the throne from the line of primogeniture to raise to become King or Queen and invade the United Kingdom to put that person on the throne(of course if the heir is still a child, when it happens, there will be a regent until the monarch comes of age).

Jacob Harrison, FSTDT Forums 278 Comments [7/22/2018 2:28:56 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 141823

Amos Yee, the Singaporean vlogger who was granted asylum in the U.S. last year, has been suspended from Twitter for his pro-pedophilia views.

The 20-year-old’s YouTube channel was removed earlier this year after he used the platform to defend pedophilia, and it appears he transitioned over to Facebook and Twitter to continue promoting those views. More recent posts were circulated and reported last week in an effort to get Yee suspended. Yee posting an image of a young girl with the caption “How does one not become a pedophile?” might have been the deciding factor for Twitter finally banning him on Saturday. However, his Twitter bio had long declared, “I defend Pedophiles publicly on the Internet.”

He was also urging followers to join his “pedo-friendly” Discord server, though according to a Facebook post, that server was taken down, as were the accounts of people in that server.

Yee’s Facebook page and Patreon account also appear to be down. Complicating matters even more, the U.S.-based activist who helped secure and finance Yee’s asylum status, Melissa Chen, now wants him to be deported. Yee was originally granted asylum after criticizing Singapore’s late president in 2015. Last year, when his pro-pedophile views started becoming public, Chen disavowed him.

On Tuesday, she released a statement writing, “Legitimizing pedophilia and organizing/promoting it generate negative externalities that involve the welfare of children, and they should not be given free reign. Being in America is a privilege and not a right. #AmosYee has abused that privilege. Deport him.”

Amos Yee, Daily Dot 11 Comments [1/4/2019 5:12:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 141821

Most people believe that the moral laws in our society are justified. If not, these moral laws would have changed already. But looking back, we see that the morality has changed. When you look at the sexual morality, then you see a lot of changes compared to one hundred years ago, but also when you compare it to some decades ago. Sex outside marriage is much more accepted nowadays. Homosexuality is much more accepted. Contraception is much more accepted. Adult pornography is much more accepted. Some things are still not accepted by a large majority of the people in Western countries. Abortion and prostitution are still under fire by many people, and everything concerning child erotica, child sexuality and child pornography. I predict that all these things are going to be accepted by a large majority in the future.

In the 1950s, writing about sexual stuff could lead to the prohibition of that writing. Books with the word ‘neuken' (fucking) in it were banned. The morality police would come into action. Porn magazines were not allowed, and what was considered porn at that time also included images like sexy lingerie photos we today see in public advertising on billboards. The adult porn movies and magazines were partly to satisfy our feelings of lust. But they were also at the same time of a political nature: they challenged our sexual norms. That is why many porn videos were shoot in civil household situations. Not in a modern looking art décor household, but in an old fashioned one. To challenge our norms. Let us be thankful to those early pornographers.

Most child porn today is produced by children themselves. This I read in De Groene Amsterdammer (18 October 2018). We as a society want to warn the children not to make sexy images of themselves. We always want to solve this problem with the repression of children's sexuality, because that is what we don't want: sexual active children. We lie to them, that we just want to protect them. There is nothing wrong, in my opinion, with minors producing porn. There is nothing wrong with minors uploading these images and videos on the internet. It is only wrong if someone does upload stuff without the permission of those involved. We have privacy laws to prevent or punish such behavior.

When pornography, including child pornography, will become more accepted, then the shame will at the same time decrease. So involuntarily sending someones nude picture to a friend of yours would be, while still wrong, less damaging. Less unnecessarily suicides will occur. We just have to learn people, of all ages, to be kind to each other, not to bully each other, and to respect their wishes, their privacy. Only looking at pictures never should be illegal. Even if these pictures are of an abusive nature or placed online without the consent of the children. Almost every adult is interested in child pornography. It is a lie to say only so called pedophiles are interested in these images and videos. Also children are interested, of course I would say, in child pornography.

In the same article in De Groene that I mentioned, we can read that the Dutch morality police does not want to arrest all child porn viewers anymore. They have not the capacity to do so. (No public institution ever says we have too much people employed.) They pick the dangerous ones to prosecute. People working with children, they consider a threat. And of course if you are caught by someone that informs the police they will prosecute. Or if you are a prominent figure. So when the Dutch morality police has a list of hundreds Dutch IP addresses they don't go after all of them. How kind of them… I still see them as bastards destroying lives of innocent people. You only need to go after persons that do bad things. I'm convinced these people (doing bad things) are a minority of the people caught by the morality police. I also hope the Dutch morality police will not share foreign, like US, IP addresses but I'm afraid they do without hesitation, knowing about the cruel and inhuman life destroying convictions in many countries.

So when more and more people are producing child porn, more and more minors producing such stuff; when more people are watching it, then in the end the morality police and our society as a whole will say: it's normal, let's change our laws. That is how it always goes with morality laws. So when you read that a man is caught looking at improper images concerning minors, then hope for him that his friends will not turn down on him, hope that he will not get punished very harsh. See him as a hero doing things you wanted but not dared to do. I write he/him because women are more sexually repressed and they are still behind, they will one day also enjoy child porn as much as men do and hopefully as children do. I believe in freedom for all.

Marthijn Uittenbogaard, marthijn.nl 9 Comments [1/4/2019 5:10:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 141825

I've been wondering for quite a while about the practical and legal difficulties surrounding the concept of compiling a carefully curated, distributed list of leftist vermin and then officially notifying them via registered mail and other legally recognized methods that they're persona non grata on the grounds of my private property and my own company and on the grounds of a fair number of other participating private property owners, sole proprietorships, and corporations. Obviously, notorious leftist vermin such as Morris Dees, Oprah Winfrey, Nancy Pelosi, Charles Schumer, Louis Farrakhan, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and hundreds of others would be high on that list.

The notice would make it crystal clear that they're considered deeply immoral persons of extraordinarily bad faith and that they're subject to immediate arrest and prosecution for trespassing and other charges should they knowingly step foot on posted properties such as restaurants, manufacturing firms, and numerous other venues. In the face of the incessant, mewling hatred shown by leftist vermin for decent Americans, such a stern measure against leftist terror seems almost inevitable. Still, one doesn't doubt that viciously fighting back in this manner would raise holy hell amongst the general public, regulatory agencies, judges, and legislators. I'm inviting thoughts on this long-overdue idea. -_-

Sarcasm Factory, Free Republic 15 Comments [1/4/2019 5:12:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 12
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 121736

Cheating whores should be humiliated in front of the whole planet. IMO adultery should be illegal, and the consequences should be even worse for females. If more conservative incels and normies are against methods like torture, rape, execution, prison (15 years), solitary confinement (7 years) and staggering financial punishment (20K-60K), then I have a new way of punishment that does not require prison, nor money nor physical harm.

Women that cheat should be taken by the police and forced to take off their clothes. The policemen now should proceed to take photos and videos of them in order to post them on social media with hashtags like # Cheating Whore and # I Broke My Family. That way, those females would feel a fraction of the humiliation felt by her husband/BF when she cheated.

BrokenIndigoCrayons, Reddit - /r/Incels 45 Comments [9/22/2016 6:06:17 PM]
Fundie Index: 24

Quote# 141556

Which Came First, Feminism Or Sin?

I've noticed that most people, men and women included, tend to be biased either more toward men or women when it comes to the battle between the sexes. I tend to be biased toward men only because sin, rebellion and indifference always exist together. Did America become wicked because of feminism, or did feminism happen because of our wickedness? Which came first, the chicken or the egg? The answer is the chicken. God created all the animals first in Genesis and then they reproduced. Concerning feminism, it came first. Eve desired EQUALITY with God. The serpent told Eve that she and Adam would become “as gods” if they ate the forbidden fruit in the Garden Of Eden. The serpent (Satan, Revelation 20:2) didn't say that Eve would be greater than God; but rather, equal with God. So the root cause of Eve's sin was the philosophy of feminism, desiring to be EQUAL with God's authority.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 17 Comments [12/19/2018 11:15:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 141427

I'm amazed how incoherent Denis Alexander's arguments were. And this is from a man who has written a book! Wayne Rossiter was a weak opponent, probably because he isn't sufficiently biblically based. Frankly a Biblical Creationist would have wiped the floor with Alexander, but then Justin's bigotry on the matter wouldn't have allowed such an opponent. The discussion never ventured from opinions, never addressing science, theology or what the Bible says.

On Adam and Eve, Denis' scenario was a joke, and Wayne spotted it immediately but never skewered him to the floor.

No, Wayne, the variation we see is not Evolution, since it is at heart a degenerative process. Evolution requires the generation of new information.

So the answer is, Creation or Evolution, yes you do have to choose.

Martin, Premier 5 Comments [12/19/2018 11:06:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: CC

Quote# 140468

Question: "Why is the idea of eternal damnation so repulsive to many people?"

Answer: In the shifting winds of modern cultures, the idea of everlasting torment and damnation is difficult for many people to grasp. Why is this? The Bible makes it clear that hell is a literal place. Christ spoke more about hell than He did of heaven. Not only Satan and his minions will be punished there, everyone who rejects Jesus Christ will spend eternity right along with them. A desire to reject or revise the doctrine of hell will not mitigate its flames or make the place go away. Still, the idea of eternal damnation is spurned by many, and here are some reasons for it:

The influence of contemporary thought. In this postmodern era, many go to great lengths to assure no one is offended, and the biblical doctrine of hell is considered offensive. It is too harsh, too old-fashioned, too insensitive. The wisdom of this world is focused on this life, with no thought of the life to come.

Fear. Never-ending, conscious punishment devoid of any hope is indeed a frightening prospect. Many people would rather ignore the source of fear than face it and deal with it biblically. The fact is, hell should be frightening, considering it is the place of judgment originally created for the devil and his angels (Matthew 25:41).

A flawed view of God’s love. Many who reject the idea of eternal damnation do so because they find it difficult to believe that a loving God could banish people to a place as horrific as hell for all eternity. However, God’s love does not negate His justice, His righteousness, or His holiness. Neither does His justice negate His love. In fact, God’s love has provided the way to escape His wrath: the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross (John 3:16-18).

A downplaying of sin. Some find it shockingly unfair that the recompense for a mere lifetime of sinning should be an eternal punishment. Others reject the idea of hell because, in their minds, sin isn’t all that bad. Certainly not bad enough to warrant eternal torture. Of course, it is usually our own sin that we downplay; other people might deserve hell—murderers and the like. This attitude reveals a misunderstanding of the universally heinous nature of sin. The problem is an insistence on our own basic goodness, which precludes thoughts of a fiery judgment and denies the truth of Romans 3:10 (“There is no one righteous, not even one”). The egregiousness of iniquity compelled Christ to the cross. God hated sin to death.

Aberrant theories. Another reason people reject the concept of eternal damnation is that they have been taught alternative theories. One such theory is universalism, which says that everyone will eventually make it to heaven. Another theory is annihilationism, in which the existence of hell is acknowledged, but its eternal nature is denied. Annihilationists believe that those who end up in hell will eventually die and cease to exist (i.e., they will be annihilated). This theory simply makes hell a temporary punishment. Both these theories are presented as viable options to the biblical teaching on hell; however, both make the mistake of placing human opinion over divine revelation.

Incomplete teaching. Many contemporary pastors who do believe in the doctrine of hell consider it simply too delicate a subject to preach on. This further contributes to the modern denial of hell. Congregants in churches where hell is not preached are ignorant of what the Bible says on the subject and are prime candidates for deception on the issue. A pastor’s responsibility is “to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints” (Jude 1:3), not pick and choose what parts of the Bible to leave out.

Satan’s ploys. Satan’s first lie was a denial of judgment. In the Garden of Eden, the serpent told Eve, “You will not surely die” (Genesis 3:4). It is still one of Satan’s main tactics. “The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers” (2 Corinthians 4:4), and the blindness he produces includes a denial of God’s holy decrees. Convince the unsaved that there is no judgment, and they can “eat, drink and be merry” with no care for the future.

If we understand the nature of our Creator, we should have no difficulty understanding the concept of hell. “[God] is the Rock, His works are perfect, and all His ways are just. A faithful God who does no wrong, upright and just is He” (Deuteronomy 32:4, emphasis added). His desire is that no one perish but that all come to repentance (2 Peter 3:9).

To contradict the Bible’s teaching on hell is to say, essentially, “If I were God, I would not make hell like that.” The problem with such a mindset is its inherent pride—it smugly suggests that we can improve on God’s plan. However, we are not wiser than God; we are not more loving or more just. Rejecting or revising the biblical doctrine of hell carries a sad irony, which one writer put this way: “The only result of attempts, however well meaning, to air-condition hell is to assure that more and more people wind up there.”

Michael Houdmann, Got Questions 3 Comments [10/15/2018 7:50:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 90669

ohn Denver is correct. He ought to be giddy today. I agree with him.

What I fuckin' hate are all these pussy conservatives like Sean Hannity now saying, "Aww, it ain't that bad. We will bounce back... American will turn to the right again... It's just one bad election."

Bull-fucking-shit! America died yesterday. It's over. There's no coming back.

236 years of history gone in one single day and night.

SPARE ME YOU'RE FUCKING GOOD TIDINGS YOU CONSERVATIVES. This is a castrophe for libertarians and conservatives. The worst of our lifetimes.

The Nazis and Communists have just seized control of the United States of America, and you fuckers are trying to convince me it ain't that bad!

Eric Dondero, Libertarian Republican 56 Comments [11/13/2012 4:07:39 AM]
Fundie Index: 61
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 25 30 40 | top