1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | bottom
Quote# 136553

Raping a virgin or married person who has never committed adultery should be a death penalty offense.

Raping a cock carousel rider should be a minor misdemeanor or perhaps merely a civil tort. $100 fine for first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and ninth offenses. $105 fine for tenth offenses and beyond.


Todd Kincannon, Gab 3 Comments [2/17/2018 7:22:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 129395

My mom has recently befriended this middle aged female she met in some fitness class. They've become close friends over the last few months and the woman often comes over to our place, sometimes with her daughter. Her daughter's a slim, bottle blonde Stacy with fake overblown lips and fake tits. She's as vapid and shallow as you'd expect. Actually she's pretty average looking and not my type at all but I'd still fuck her. Whenever she's forced to talk to me you can see the discomfort and disgust in her eyes. I've tried being nice to her but she just brushes me off coldly. I don't know what I've done to deserve this treatment (other than being subhuman) and hate sitting at the dinner table with her. One time I held the door open for her like an absolute cuck and she didn't say thank you. She didn't even glance in my direction. I'm just some dog shit she steps over.

My mom constantly tries to hook me up with Stacy. She always tells me that this girl "likes" me (lies) and that we should go on dates. This Stacy would never want to touch me, let alone go on a date with me. She's completely offended by my existence and spends most of her time on Tinder. Even her mom has made some cringy jokes about us going out and "getting to know each other''. If you guys could see the look of disgust on Stacy's face. Females just shudder at the thought of interacting with non-Chad males.

incellius, r/incels 11 Comments [7/17/2017 4:56:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 131130

Daily Reminder: The only years that matter are those between ages 15-22

And all we did in these years was rot alone in out rooms. We missed out teenage love and university sex. These two are IRREPLACABLE experiences that contribute to the development of a healthy mental and emotional state. While girls in their 20s try to have as much sex as posssible we were deemed inadequate because we didn't cut it lookswise. If you didn't have sex as a university student then you NEVER will. As time goes by, females raise their standards and by the age of 25 they only go for 10/10 guys.

Life ends after 22. From that point and on it's just repeating cycle. Home, work, home , work every day over and over again. At the same time, Chad is trying out different things with his girlfriend and goes to trips all around the world. Male models make money just by doing photoshoots and spend most of the time banging prime fembots. What does an incel do? ROT. Whether he is at work or at home he is decaying mentally and physically due to his inferior genetic composistion.

Morevoer, if you didn't have any school or college sex binges then you will be weird in the eyes of others. Such experiences are necessary to be socially integrated and accepted by Normies. A 20+ year old virgin is an abominaton to people's eyes.

incelwarrior95, /r/incels 12 Comments [8/30/2017 2:17:29 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 132927

I was on the bus today, the thing packed because the driver was late, I one of the few lucky ones to get a seat next to a window. It was raining outside so although some air would have been nice I would have been soaked by the rain. EXCEPT, an 8/10 femoid standing next to me had a different idea about that. She said "ugh, it's so hot here" very high so many people would hear her, and then reached over my head and forced the window open without asking or caring I would get wet. I looked at her immediately as the rain started hitting me and i swear she was smiling.

It took me a few seconds of hesitation looking at her angrily (she avoided my gaze, typical reaction towards a subhuman), but finally I got up, closed the window with all my might and sat down again without looking at her. There was a silence in the bus, everyone was expecting to see what the girl would do (I was half shitting myself and half laughing maniacally inside). And then she said it: "DID YOU SEE WHAT HE DID???" while pointing at me (saw the reflection on the window, didn't look at her).

No one answered or cared, and she shut up in defeat for like 5 more stops. I didn't dare look again her way but I felt power coursing through my vains all day. I encourage incels to try and impose themselves more against femoids.

sergeantincel, r/incels 8 Comments [10/13/2017 11:31:03 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 135418

Final Decision: Femails **are** evil people because

They claim that sex is 'fun and feels good' yet there are still incels out who are dying because of lack of sex. It's not like a woman actually has to give something up or endure pain (no woman is virgin) to have sex with an incel. It's basically fun in exchange for fun. They only do it for chads and make sure to unmatch non chads on tinder and ghost incels in person and online. There's really no argument to go on. I don't expect any comments on this post, since women are evil people by this logic.

Incel331, /r/Braincels 14 Comments [12/22/2017 3:53:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136703

Feminism has always been about women gaining political power so they can fuck over nuclear families, men, and feminine women. Feminism hates these three core subjects because:

Nuclear family: It represents all that they cannot have. Feminists tend to be unpleasant, both in manner and face, therefore they cannot land a good man with whom to start families with. Instead they rot in a filthy apartment, surrounded by cats and empty wine bottles.

Men: Feminists hate men, regardless of the "feminism doesn't hate men" meme. They all secretly hate masculinity, male nature, etc, because it is male nature to go for pretty, feminine girls, and feminists are anything but. Unable to land themselves a hunk, they are instead surrounded by cats and male feminists, which all women hate instinctively, feminist or not.

Feminine women: Feminists believe that feminine women have stolen everything from them, whether it be the modelling jobs or marriage-worthy men. That is why they do everything in their power to screw over feminine women, such as attempting to ban adverts featuring pretty women under the guise of "objectification", when in reality they are just jealous of being reminded of what they do not have: a rockin' hot body. This has recently become public knowledge by the "banning grid girls" incident, which involved feminism campaigning against "female objectification" until finally the grid girls were fired. This goes against the feminist narrative of wanting more women to acquire work, because feminism has kicked women out of work.

As you can see, the entire movement is just a giant shit-storm of insecurity, and it reeks of it.

Techn03712, r/The_Donald 3 Comments [2/16/2018 11:54:58 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 136698

Oxfam sex scandal is not an isolated case
Oxfam is not the only charitable organization fighting to maintain its credibility after a sex scandal. Crisis relief workers abusing their power isn't a new phenomenon.

One would expect that humanitarian workers take care of the people urgently in need of assistance during and following a crisis. But the image of the altruistic aid worker is too often a myth because anyone who is in the position to help others is the one wielding the power - and some take advantage of it.

Staff members of Britain's non-governmental organization Oxfam allegedly organized orgies with prostitutes in the organization's villa after the devastating earthquake in Haiti in 2010. But the scandal doesn't stop there. Sex parties were reportedly also held during relief missions in Chad in 2006. Oxfam staff members apparently even raped women in South Sudan.

It is not the first sex scandal that has shaken the world of international aid, according to Burkhard Wilke, managing director of the German Central Institute for Social Issues (DZI).

"Employees or partners of aid organizations in aid regions have repeatedly made themselves complicit in the sexual exploitation of the local population," he told DW.

The medical aid organizationMedicines [sic] sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders) recently reported 24 cases of abuse or sexual harassment in the past year. The International Rescue Committee (IRC) admits that there have been three cases of sexual abuse during operations in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Brothel in the Balkans

Cases of aid worker misconduct reach back to the Yugoslavian wars in the 1990s. International aid workers were involved in the sexual exploitation of girls and women during the wars in the Balkans. UN blue helmet soldiers and humanitarian workers were all said to have visited prostitutes on a regular basis.

The German women's rights organization Medica Mondiale helped traumatized women in Bosnia during the Balkan conflict, and the Cologne-based NGO still helps girls and women in war and crisis regions.

Ara Stielau, Medica Mondiale's director of the international programs, said the aid worker scene regarded visits to prostitutes during missions as a "trivial offense and private pleasure." Stielau said she still remembers the words of a German aid organization's executive when he was confronted with the sexual misconduct of some of his employees. He apparently replied, "I can't watch what my men are doing between the sheets."

Inhibitions are lower

Economic hardship is among the reasons why women in crisis regions work as prostitutes. Women often suffer so much that they lose their inhibitions and are willing to accept food or money for sex, Stielau said. That is how local women in need of help can become dependent on male aid workers from abroad who ultimately have resources and the power to distribute relief supplies.

"Employees of an organization have money and thus the power to help one person and not another - and that creates temptation," Wilke added.
Uk Oxfam-Sex-Skandal | Logo (picture alliance/AP Photo/N. Ansell)

Oxfam was caught most recently, but it's not the only aid group with ethical lapses

Most international aid organizations are aware of these dangers and have put in place special codes of conduct for all employees.

"However, the Oxfam case reveals that the necessary consequences are not always drawn when it comes to sexual misconduct," Wilke said.

A trust crisis

"Using the services of prostitutes may not necessarily be against national laws, but it violates all codes of conduct issued by relief organizations," Wilke said, adding that organizations risk losing their reputation if their employees are caught acting immorally.

That loss of trust can be a huge problem as credibility is key in the world of international charity. NGO aid organizations depend on donations — and on the trust of donors who want to know that their money is going to the people who need it.

For this reason, Wilke said misconduct should be reported "unsparingly" to the public. Transparency is the top priority. In Germany, Wilke's institute awards a seal of approval to organizations for ethical and transparent work. In the event of misconduct, NGOs may lose the seal of approval.

Various depraved aid workers, Deutsche Welle 1 Comments [2/16/2018 12:30:28 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136690

[Link to first comment, quote contains multiple]

"Husbands and wives must be partners, without either ruling over the other."

This is actually completely wrong. Moloch literally has the easiest job in hell.

Let's put it this way.

A society decides slavery is evil.
The first slavery they notice is wives serving and obeying husbands.
they 'free' women.
Within a generation, EVERY TIME, these free and empowered women start murdering their babies... Every time. And every society that murders their own babies crashes and burns... every time.

So, if you want a civilization that works and doesn't murder babies, Husbands have to have absolute responsibility and power over their wives... and there has to be harsh social and possibly even criminal consequences for any woman that violates this bond.

Because they LOVE sacrificing babies to Moloch.


" Women are the ones with the biological clock ticking in their belly, so THEY are the ones to cross the picket line."

SJW's always double down. Women are the original SJWs.
Not going to happen. What IS going to happen is that men are going to take back the privileges they have given women. Or they are going to Die and whatever people replace us won't give their women 'freedom' (and doom themselves) for at least a couple of generations.

So, our best bet is on convincing people that women are not human. Or converting to islam. If your are christian, and want to stay that way, you need to fight a lot harder.


"What is needed is for women to wake up and realize how much this gig sucks, how we were tricked and brain-washed..."

Not going to happen. Maybe on an individual basis, but en masse? Women NEVER take personal responsibility. They cannot 'wake up to reality' because reality hates them... They are designed to let men interface with reality FOR them. They are not made that way, for very good reasons.

No. There is only one choice. Women are property. Any time this paradigm is disrupted by weak and pathetic men, they destroy everything... Free women are Shiva the Destroyer, They are Kali, they are Lilith and Eve and Delilah. They hate themselves, they hate their 'freedom', they hate the men that failed to keep them in line, they hate their children, and the society that was foolish enough to give them the freedom they despise so much.
They are the force that drives human evolution, by destroying the men who become too weak to keep them in their place, that become too soft to enslave them, that become too nice to kill to possess them.

No, women can no more change themselves than they can wish away reality. Men are the active principal. We are left with only two choices. We put you in your place or you replace us with men that will.

This is our fight. stop trying to pretend that you are anything other than loot. ESPECIALLY stop lying to yourselves and pretending that you'd have it any other way.

Dire Badger, Vox Popoli 4 Comments [2/16/2018 12:04:07 PM]
Fundie Index: 6

Quote# 136648

Happy MGTOW day brothers!

By choosing to celebrate MGTOW day, you saved yourself $150 on a dinner at a ridiculously over-priced restaurant. $60 on a bottle of champagne/wine. $20 on a bouquet of flowers. $30 on cab/uber. You probably also saved $100 on new clothes, $50 on a pre-date haircut and shave. You must certainly saved yourself from getting stood-up, spending on a thot who might never sleep with you and false rape allegations. Countless other benefits.

May this lifestyle grow so big that we officially replace V-day with MGTOW day on the calendar. Cheers!

monster797, r/MGTOW 28 Comments [2/14/2018 5:03:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136664

I deserve financial compensation

From the government. I want to sue for 10 million dollars. What I am going through is much worse than what that guy who got dragged off the plane went through (and he got millions). Heck, you can get in a car accident and get a little injured then sue for psychological distress for 10s of thousands of dollars. But where is my money? I want to sue the government for not providing me with a reasonable opportunity to get sex or a relationship.

I have been trying to get a gf for the past 6 months but it is impossible to meet girls, and the few I met none of them worked out.

I tried online dating, it sucks balls. Girls reply, but then they stop talking due to 80/20 rule. Once they start talking to me a chad messages them then they lose interest. I have messaged over 100 girls, maybe 30 replied (which is actually a pretty fucking high reply rate which proves theres nothing wrong with my looks yet it goes to show you just how the 80/20 rule is in place.. I mean I am pretty decent looking but I am not 8/10 or higher). And of those I have been spending hours per day on them, only to have them ghost on me. It is such a fuckng frustrating and anxiety provoking feeling: talking to a girl, putting HOURS of effort, sometimes weeks... thinking EVERY message she sends you will be her LAST, then suddenly one of her messages DOES become the LAST OUT OF THE BLUE AND WITHOUT WARNING AND NOT BASED ON WHAT YOU WROTE... it is like skipping a step. It sucks balls. Fuck this shit. It has given me major anxiety and nervousness and is causing me to me physically ill. But I have no choice... this is my only way to meet girls. So far only ONE girl has been talking to me for over a week and I went on a date with her which went perfectly but even she is stalling with the 2nd date... I have a feeling she is giving me excuses because she is stalling every time I bring up the 2nd date.. I have a feeling she too is being messaged by a chad. Well can you fucking blame me when this happened with EVERY SINGLE GIRL I talked to so far? I am a pretty decent looking guy, I am smart, witty, funny, social, etc... I don't know why it has to be like this. Fuck this shit.

My psychological distress is MUCH worse than people who sued for MILLIONS. I deserve at least 10 million, relatively speaking. You want to be progressive? Well fucking pay me 10 million then. Or just get rid of 3rd wave feminism and bring back patriarchy so I could get a girlfriend.

For the past 3 weeks I have been talking to this girl and every time my phone vibrates and there is a message from her I start feeling nauseas and getting sweat hands.. like.. is THIS gonna be the message that stabs me in the throat YET FUCKING AGAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE PAST FUCKING 30 GIRLS HOWEVER I HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE because it is the only fucking possible way of possibly ever fucking getting a girlfriend I am almost fucking 30 fuck this motherfucking shit I just want this nightmare to end I just want to have ONE fucking relationships I just want to have sex ONCE with a girl just so I can know what it is like so I can fucking get on with my life I hate this fucking feeling of playing catch up every single day with everythign on the line fuck you motherfucking normies you don't know how bad incels ahve it yo fucking weak ass pussies wouldn't last a day in our shoes motherfuck you. fuck you.

whatwasthatcat, r/Braincels 14 Comments [2/15/2018 2:06:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pax Prosperitas Sophia

Quote# 136668

Why all modern women secretly crave a spanking

1) Her social role conflicts with her innate biological role

Women are born from their mothers’ wombs and when they die they return to dust, just as any being born of God.
To pretend that any man or women is more than a biological creature with innate biological programming is idiotic.
The primary purpose of a women’s life is to receive a healthy man’s seed, create a healthy offspring and nurture this child until it can provide for itself.
Women have been taught by feminism gone wrong that they should go out to work and prioritize themselves above their biological role. They are taught it is acceptable to produce offspring and then pay other women to look after them.
Every women that indulges in these practices is in a state of inner turmoil. Her superficial and pseudo-dominant social role is in direct conflict with her submissive and maternal inner-nature. When you place her over your knee, you bring her back one step closer to that innate biological role, where she is controlled and over-powered by a dominant male figure.
A spanking evokes primal emotions that women living in today’s sick Western society crave more than ever before.


3) She craves a strong dominant father figure (Daddy Issues)

Did you ever hear the phrase “Men marry their mothers and women marry their fathers” ?
It’s origin is in Jung’s theory of the Electra Complex.
Well, it’s true.
The unfortunate reality is that many modern Western women were raised without a strong father figure. The result of which is that the women has unresolved ‘daddy issues’. This is not in itself a bad thing, as it can form the basis of powerful sexual fantasies.
Subconsciously, modern women crave the staunch discipline of the strong unyielding father figure that they never received as a child. They act up, being rude and disrespectful in every day life, subconsciously yearning for somebody to call them out on their behaviour and teach them a lesson.
b]When you spank your women, you directly fulfil her sexual and emotional craving for a dominant father figure.[/b]


5) She craves release from the pressure of control

Today’s women is at boiling point.
Many healthy, strong, dominant men have sexually submissive fantasies. Many top CEOs will hire expensive dominatrixes to take control of them in the bedroom after office hours.
The reason is simple: it is a release from the constant pressure of being in control, that their egos demand in day-to-day life. If a man spends 15 hours a day being in charge, it will be exciting to him to relinquish that which his ego holds so precious.
The same theory applies to modern women. Since so many modern women have invested heavily in their careers, they spend the majority of their day being in charge. They are forced to constantly control the world around them, which is in direct opposition to their submissive nature and innate biological role to nurture and care.
When a women arrives home with her head spinning after a day in the office, she wants nothing more than to relinquish control. She is bound to be cranky and rude after a day in the office. A spanking will calm her down and put her in a position where she is not in control. This is where she rightfully belongs and where she craves to be placed.

6) Society provides her with no viable end-goal

What has been the clear and transparent end goal of human society, since time immemorial?
To survive, successfully breed and bring up a healthy family capable of procreating the bloodline into the next generation.
In our hyper-indulgent, post WWII society we live in a time of unprecedented gluttony. Today’s spoilt woman has no need to think of survival. And where she should be thinking of how to take advantage of the peacetime and raise the best family possible, she has been programmed by the media to think only of herself and her career.
Modern women’s daily priorities are at direct odds with her ancestral maternal imperatives. This leaves her with with a huge gap in her soul and prone to depression.
She subconsciously craves to be reconnected with her ancestral imperative and to have a clear goal placed in front of her by a dominant male leader.
When you put her over your knee, you put her in a primal place where she is no longer required to be in control and is one step closer to her natural human state being guided towards survival and prosperity.

Rodney Hand, The Head of Household 14 Comments [2/15/2018 2:09:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 136525

As thousands cower under the howling rockets and bursting shells unleashed by the Syrian regime, opposition leaders have released thousands of emails exchanged between the Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad and his wife Asma, a British-born and educated beauty who has long been held to be a shining example of modern womanhood, featured many times in fashion magazines and the like.

Some of the emails show Asma making jokes at the expense of the people of Homs, who have been under siege and sustained attack for some time. Several Western journalists have been killed while covering the assault, which current reports describe as brutal and indiscriminate. In another email, Asma claims to be the real power behind the regime, saying that Bashar al-Assad has no choice but to listen to her. Evidently, her advice has not been merciful.

Not long before the Arab Spring revolts that erupted last year, the first ladies of the Arab world were regularly praised as trail-blazing feminists who commanded great influence and power. Of 22 Arab states, 15 first ladies signed up for a feminist organization called the Arab Women Organization. In 2009, Helen Smith of The Guardian described the group as “founded with the express purpose of empowering women…” and lavishes praise on its members.

The list of member states is eye-opening: Jordan, the Emirates, Bahrain, Tunisia, Algeria, Sudan, Syria, Oman, Palestine, Lebanon, Libya, Egypt, Mauritania, Morocco and Yemen are all members. All but a couple of these states have faced unrest over the last year, and nearly half open civil war or regime change.

One of the things feminists often claim is that if women ran the world, there would be no more war, conflict, hunger, etc. Anyone with a cursory knowledge of history knows this to be ridiculous; female heads of state have been every bit as warmongering as their male counterparts, if not more so. From Queen Isabella and Elizabeth I to Empress Dowager Cixi, female leaders have been associated with bloodshed and chaos. Now, if we are to take her word for it, we have Asma Assad to add to the list.

One thing Westerners tend not to understand about the Arab world is that although the people themselves tend to be deeply conservative and traditional, their elites and leaders are far less so. This is beginning to become more the case in the US, but the divide is far more stark in places such as Egypt and Syria. Many of the leaders – and their wives – were educated in the liberal Western tradition when anti-traditionalism was at its peak, while opposition leaders are more likely to have gone to school in madrassas to study classical Arabic and the Koran. The Arab people see these first ladies traveling around in limousines bedecked with priceless jewels and wearing the latest fashions while mouthing platitudes about women’s rights and “progress.” In the meanwhile, young Arab men can’t find work and many of their would-be wives are stuck at home with little chance of starting a family of their own.

We aren’t there yet, but we’re getting closer by the day. If our feminists can’t see their role in creating the kind of social decay that eventually leads to regime change, it’s only because it isn’t in their nature to concern themselves with these matters. As for the Arab elites who let their wives rule, we have only to read the newspaper to see what eventually happens to men who grow soft and seek counsel in the bedchamber.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 2 Comments [2/15/2018 8:00:44 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 136624

Though modern libtards and Marxified millennials will no doubt gush over this "feel good" story; to a traditionalist with a healthy appreciation and respect for true womanhood, true motherhood, and healthy culture, there is so much bloody wrong with this pathetic comedy unfolding down in New Zealand.

Jacinda Ardern is a 37 year-old New Zealand feminist Globalist libtard who became Prime Minister in October, 2017. During her campaign, she attracted international media attention when she bitchily denounced the male interviewer who had asked whether she planned to have children and take maternity leave if elected. Ardern -- oblivious to the fact that she serves the public -- was applauded for defiantly telling the interviewer (and by extension, the public) that it was “totally unacceptable in 2017” for women in the workplace to have to answer such a question.

Arden joins Refrigerator Solberg of Norway, the Frumpy Frau of Germany and Mamma May of the UK as female leaders of libtarded nations. Well, at least she is much easier on the eyes than the other three rancid hags.

Now, just a few months later, Ms. Ardern, who is not married, has announced that she is expecting her first child, due in June. A bit of basic math confirms that she must have already been pregnant while running for Prime Ministerette. How very "modern" of her. But there's more. Her "partner" and "baby daddy," Clarke Gayford, has just announced that he will take leave from his job after the birth to become a stay-at-home dad. Still more modern comedy, straight from the article:

"She admitted that her family’s situation was unusual in some ways, saying that she had suffered “pretty bad” morning sickness during the first three months while forming a new government, and that she did not know “how the government cars would feel about having a baby seat in them.”

Ms. Ardern said she planned to work right up until she gives birth and would then take six weeks of parental leave. During that time, she said, the deputy prime minister, Winston Peters, will assume her duties.

After that, Ms. Ardern added, she planned to return to “full duties,” with Mr. Gayford traveling with her and their child as often as possible."

This drama is really a dream-come-true for the modern libtard. It's got everything -- a vomiting female Prime Minister who is an unwed mother, set to collect parental leave pay while the de-balled and dutiful "baby daddy" adapts to his "stay-at-home" subordinate role. We wonder, will the Prime Ministerette be breast-feeding or breast-pumping into little plastic bottles, as she rides in the back of her limo while she and baby-daddy are out and about on state visits? Oh what a horrible example of "family life" to set for the young women and men of New Zealand!

The new Prime Ministerette and P-whipped First Baby Daddy of New Zealand?

It is not out of disrespect for women, but rather, to the contrary, out of the highest respect for women that Sugar and I, er, "The Editorial Board" of The Anti-New York Times can only heap mockery upon this sordid spectacle. A woman's place -- especially for a new mother -- and her ultimate satisfaction in life is to be found in the "hearth and home," not the bloody, nasty, and intrinsically dishonest world of politics. We understand that that the modern debt-based capitalist-communist economy requires many miserable mothers to work because one income is often insufficient to carry a household. But that is certainly not the case with "baby daddy" here -- who is (soon-to-be "was") a well-paid host of a TV fishing show.

Indeed, British Queen Victoria -- though she naively allowed the despicable Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli (cough cough) to undermine the long term interests of the Empire -- was spot-on correct when she looked into the future and warned about feminism and women in politics:

"I am most anxious to enlist everyone who can speak or write to join in checking this mad, wicked folly of "Women's Rights", with all its attendant horrors, on which her poor feeble sex is bent, forgetting every sense of womanly feelings and propriety. Feminists ought to get a good whipping. Were woman to "unsex" themselves by claiming equality with men, they would become the most hateful, heathen and disgusting of beings and would surely perish without male protection. I love peace and quiet, I hate politics and turmoil. We women are not made for governing, and if we are good women, we must dislike these masculine occupations."

Tell it Queenie, tell it!

And yet, we doubt that even Queen Victoria could have foreseen this idiotic modern freak show that is still developing down in New Zealand, with similar situations throughout the western world.


A few of the "hateful, heathen and disgusting" finger-waving maniacs that Queen Victoria accurately foresaw: Killary Rotten Clinton, Senator Elizabeth "Pocahontas" Warren, Congresswoman Maxi-Pad Waters

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times today that the Prime Minister of New Zealand is expecting a baby and will take maternity leave.

Boobus Americanus 2: That great. It sets a wonderful example of what is possible for our daughters.

Sugar: Boobuss, you pathetic little mangina! Thiss brazen little husssy needss to ressign, quit her left-wing politicss, marry the father and sstay home to raisse her litter -- like I did.

Editor: It's a shame that your ungrateful little kittens never call you.

Mike King, Tomato Bubble 12 Comments [2/13/2018 1:30:02 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Yossarian Lives

Quote# 136629

This is depressing as all hell. But even as a dyed in the wool leftist, I would consider casting my vote with a right wing party like the Tories to prevent self-ID / the Gender Recognition Act update from going into place. If the Tories were to back away from it fully, as Justine Greening seemed to be doing, I would definitely think long and hard about voting for them even though I loathe everything else they stand for...

That said, chances are quite high that I would still opt to simply spoil a ballot given that choice, rather than vote for the right wing, but I would definitely have to really think hard. I am sure that many women who are not as left wing would find it a no-brainer though.

Once self-ID goes on the books, it will stay there possibly forever. As much as Tory policies surrounding health care, Brexit, welfare, employment legistlation, and basically everything else are a flaming garbage fire, most of that could be reversed by a Labour party under new leadership that's had some sense smacked into it by the desertion of women it caused with its misogynistic behavior.

FeminamRadicalis, r/GenderCritical 5 Comments [2/13/2018 11:42:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136667

Your Life – As Nature Intended

Are you?

Tired of meeting dis-respectful, rude and brat-like women?
Feel as if you belong in a previous era – like the 1950s?
Know you’re a good man at heart, but feel like the world’s gone crazy around you?
Feel as if the experience of wearing the pants in a relationship has somehow passed you by?

Sure, I felt that way too.

Until I manned up and taught myself the life skills that enabled me to:

Walk my household like a man and stuff my cock down my woman’s throat at any time I please
Be bought constant supplies of baked goods and nourishing dishes
Fuck my woman like a sexual object at any time I please, in any way I please
Have sex so intensely mind-blowing my vision blurs when I reach orgasm
Put my woman over my knee whenever I see rude or impolite behaviour
Have my woman thank me for spanking her and beg to suck my cock afterwards
Lead my relationship and set mutual goals – like a good-hearted, caring and traditional husband

I wrote this book to help the everyday man with his biggest dilemma: brainwashed women who believe in equal relationships and feminism.

What you will learn:

How to use Sexual Normalization to bring you and your woman back to your inner monkey natures
Exact techniques on how to use Forced Cock Worship to create an emotional bond of intimacy more powerful than any other
Detailed instructions for how to Verbally Reprogram your woman into agreeing to a submissive relationship role
What your woman really wants from your Leadership, but can’t put into words
Penile strength training secrets to get erections bigger and harder than you thought possible
Vaginal strength training secrets that will literally change your life
Exact methods of how to dictate your woman’s vaginal training regime
How to have the true mindset of a traditional male head of household
How to dispense discipline like a secure traditional husband and not a insecure, domineering asshole.

And the Bonus Program:

“Sassy to Submissive in 6 Weeks” – exact instructions on how to have your new girlfriend Intellectualize and Rationalize a submissive relationship role and then sign a Relationship Contract


Relationship Contract Template – for a Modern Male-Led Relationship®


The techniques and methods in this book are extremely psychologically powerful! When you play with fire, be careful not to get burned. Use at your own risk!

$19.99 $9.89

Rodney Hand, The Head of Household 11 Comments [2/15/2018 2:09:10 AM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 130835

Today a woman* touched my hand

I punched her so hard that some of her teeth came out. I bet makeup can't fix that

MarriedAndLookin4Fun, /r/IncelReddit 17 Comments [8/21/2017 10:34:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136660

[When you read the cover of an econ book once]

More proof that Economics is the subject where women have the greatest underperformance relative to men, even more so than engineering :

When women join the workforce, everyone’s wages rise, including mens’. [Text is a link to a Harvard Business Review study from January 2018: https://hbr.org/2018/01/when-more-women-join-the-workforce-wages-rise-including-for-men]

To the extent that voters should grasp the most basic economic concepts, female suffrage was the greatest disaster a prosperous society can possibly inflict upon itself.

Anon, Dalrock 4 Comments [2/15/2018 1:49:07 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 136661

Many women deserve to be punched, and do not get punched, but punching a woman indicates loss of control and weakness. You should avoid getting into fights except where you can bring overwhelming supremacy to bear, and you should always be able to bring overwhelming supremacy to bear on a woman. If you have overwhelming supremacy, you can pin the opponent, and either put a painful submission hold on them, or whack him part of the body where it is safe to do so without likelihood of causing injury.

I have found I can use this kind of violence on a woman in public, safe and controlled irresistible violence, and everyone just grins. Especially other women.

Part of being able to control what kind of fights you get into is to be well prepared for a terrible, destructive, and uncontrolled fight where you cannot bring overwhelming supremacy to bear, and I am always prepared for such a fight. I am trained in unarmed combat, and when going into an unpredictable situation carry the most dangerous concealed weapon legally permitted, but the reason to be prepared for such a fight is not to get into such a fight and win, but to be able to better get out of such a fight by offering your opponent a safer path, offering your opponent a dignified way out of such a fight. One prepares for such a fight in order to better obtain your opponents cooperation in staying out of such fights, not to fight and win them, for even if you win, seldom profitable. Even if you win, you lose. Having the potential to do your adversary great harm is often profitable. Actually exercising that potential is rarely profitable.

Jesus said “resist not evil”, but we cannot take this literally, because if evil smells that you are a soft target, evil will be on to you like a dingo on a baby. We have to interpret the sermon on the mount as Jesus anticipating crucifixion, and pointing at our inability to attain salvation by personal virtue in a fallen world. Literal application of the Sermon on the Mount would be suicidal in a fallen world. We apply it by always being willing to do what it takes to find the path that does not involve terrible and destructive combat. But it takes two to make peace, only one to make war, and to find the peaceful path requires the ability to dissuade your opponent from the path of combat.

White knights are evil men – a man who white knights another man’s woman is a man who will spread hateful lies about his friend behind his friend’s back to sow discord and anger between friends. A man who white knights another man’s woman also engages in every kind of depraved and cowardly evil. When you punch a woman, no matter how much she deserves it, you show weakness and loss of frame, and weakness attracts evil. Deal with a misbehaving woman with firmness and strength, you will have no problems. Deal with her from weakness, white knights will materialize like flies on rotting meat.

Jim, Jim's Blog 10 Comments [2/15/2018 1:51:56 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 136476

I see women as nothing but victims

They are so weak and fragile. I can easily subdue them and dominate their bodies. Even these liberated whores who brag about how many chads they fucked are absolutely helpless against me. When a female is at your mercy, her lay count, your virginity don't matter anymore. At that point, it's just nature's work.

Females are scared of ugly men. They feel violated by the mere touch of a subhuman. They are so powerless against men that I cannot see heterosexual sex as nothing but rape. It's not actual sex if one side(the man) could have just subdued her from the start without consent and impregnate her against her will.

Lesbian sex, on the other hand, is actual sex because women are on the same power level and no matter how violent they are to one another there is no risk of forced impregnation.

Even if you have a loving gf, she can just change her mind after you fuck her and call it rape and it won't make a goddam difference if she consented or not because at its core, heterosexual sex is identical with rape.

Having the ability to impregnate a woman puts you at a higher power level than her. Forcing your semen into a girl's vagina is the worse thing that can happen to her, even worse than death.

M. Bison, incels.me 13 Comments [2/13/2018 1:43:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136646

Everytime I see a girl I think about raping her

It's not about the PIV. It's about the priceless expression of pure agony and distress on her face over the danger of being insemenated by an ugly subhuman. There is nothing more satisfying than wiping those stupid smiles off their faces. Women took away my happiness and I want to take away theirs.

Without teen love and college sex it's impossible to have a healthy view of women. I am incapable of feeling anything for thse whores and sharing horniness and emotions with them like NT people do. I only have violent feeling for females because of the violence they practiced on me all these years. You can't like people that hate you. You can't. You have to make them suffer.

M. Bison, incels.me 15 Comments [2/14/2018 5:02:58 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136597

(Description and back-cover blurb of a book titled "Der Kompass: Frauen verführen - ohne Moral" - "The Compass: Seducing women - without morality")
For decades, the Seduction Community (Translator's note; grating gratuitous English; another word for PUAs) has been researching and calibrating the ultimate formula: How to seduce a woman? What is the key to sex-success?
The result of the research: An astounding effective system! Secret lore previously only avaible to insiders.
In The Compass, this knowledge is presented and explained in a generally understandable form. With The Compass, the secret lore of the Seduction Community is avaible to everyone and comprehensible. With The Compass, every nan will get to sex-success.

@Original German:
Seit Jahrzehnten forscht und feilt die Seduction Community an der ultimativen Formel: Wie verführt man eine Frau? Was ist der Schlüssel zum Sex-Erfolg?
Das Ergebnis der Forschungen: Ein verblüffendes, wirkungsvolles System! Eine Geheimlehre, die bislang nur Insidern zugänglich war.
Im Kompass wird dieses Wissen erstmals allgemeinverständlich dargestellt und erklärt. Mit dem Kompass wird das Geheimwissen der Seduction Community für jedermann verfügbar und fassbar. Mit dem Kompass kommt jeder Mann zum Sex-Erfolg.

Vernon Colonna, Amazon 5 Comments [2/12/2018 3:48:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 136622

The popular “50 Shades of Grey” romance/porn novel has been making waves in the publishing industry as women from all walks of life find themselves aroused by its theme of utter surrender to a man. According to a Fox News article, feminists, too, approve of the book, which began as a fanfic spinoff from the Twilight series (naturally).

Given how the story is described, it looks like a rip-off of the Story of O that Heartiste enthusiastically recommends as the key to understanding women’s erotic desires:

The plot of “50 Shades of Grey” centers on a young and naïve college student named Anastasia Steele who is seduced by a rich and powerful entrepreneur named Christian Grey. Grey persuades Steele to sign a contract that allows him complete control over her life, in and out of the bedroom. Yet despite the fact that Steele becomes completely submissive to a very dominant man, feminists aren’t up in arms.

You know, I’m starting to wonder whether the models of domestic violence touted by feminists in which men seek utter control over women aren’t really a pornographic fantasy. I recently watched “Sleeping with the Enemy,” a film from the 90s starring Julia Roberts as a battered wife. Although the film wasn’t all that well done, there was definitely some erotic element to the dominance and control exerted by her psychopathic husband.

Contrary to what popular myths might lead one to believe, the book is more distressing to men than to women, but that makes perfect sense. Most men are disturbed by the idea of being objectified and dominated in the bedroom, and have a hard time relating to female sexuality.

While women are applauding the book, some men are expressing concern over whether women should be insulted by a plot dominated by a man who tells a woman when to sleep, eat, work out and even how to groom herself. Television host Dr. Drew Pinsky recently called the book a “rape fantasy” on his HLN show. Women writers laughed off Pinsky’s remarks, saying there is absolutely no reason for men to weigh in on this issue at all, and certainly no reason for them to use the term rape.

Perhaps what’s most demoralizing to men is that most of them have been instructed to behave in exactly the opposite manner from what turns so many women on. Additionally, most men simply aren’t all that dominant whether they restrain themselves or not. “Christian Grey” is a figment of the female imagination — guys like that hardly exist in real life. When they do turn up, other men take them down.

Nevertheless, the book and the discussions surrounding it show that the cat’s out of the bag. Men who have been fooled about women’s true nature for their entire lives, and who still try to fool themselves, are finding themselves demoralized by women’s enthusiastic endorsement of utter objectification and submission.

For more on the novel, check out Paul LaRosa’s take on it. Paul seemed a bit confused by its success, asking “Is it possible that so many women dream of becoming the submissive partner of a dominant male partner which, after all, is the central plot of the book?” He discovers that yes, in fact, this is what they dream of.

W. F. Price, The Spearhead 8 Comments [2/13/2018 1:28:08 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 136645

[An answer to the question "Why are Eastern European women so beautiful as compared to their Western European and North American counterparts?"]

Lived in Eastern Europe for 15 years

I remember reading copy on a website for Russian Brides stating that they are 'unspoiled by feminism'. While being far from politically correct, there is a certain amount of truth to this.

Gender roles in Eastern Europe are (or were) closer to those of the West a generation ago that they are today. Women had less opportunities to make a good career for themselves and so saw their best prospects for advancement in using their beauty to attract a rich husband. They therefore take care of themselves better than Western women.

Helena Rubenstein once said, 'there are no ugly woman, just lazy ones'. Eastern European take a lot of care regarding this appearance and tend to 'dress to impress'. They also watch their weight a lot more than Western women do.

Genetics is probably another element to the equation - Slavic women just have very attractive features (although this can vary - no one gets too excited about Bulgarian women).

Things are changing though as feminism comes to some of the countries, specifically the Central European countries such as Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary. Here gender roles are changing to European norms and women are taking less care of themselves. In Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, it hasn't got to that stage yet, but chances are that they will in the future.

The above only applies to younger women; they don't tend to age too well in general and it's rare to find Eastern European 'cougars' who still look good after 40.

Nick Pendrell, Quora 11 Comments [2/14/2018 5:02:42 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 136628

(TRAs is a TERF term for transgender activists.)

It's a very common tactic for TRAs to claim that they aren't doing/saying the thing that they are doing/saying before everyone's very eyes.

I have seen internet debates where they will say something outrageous and then in the next breath claim that they never said the thing that they said five seconds ago, and the person who called them out on it is just a crazy fantasist. It's the same tactic that all gaslighters and emotional abusers use.

Expecting a good faith debate or even a consistent position from them is foolhardy. We are dealing with a political movement that is based on male dominance and extreme narcissism - of course they are going to use the tactics of narcissists and abusers when advancing their political agenda.

Lil_Z, r/GenderCritical 2 Comments [2/13/2018 11:42:37 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 136452

Women cannot do men’s jobs, and the pretense that they can and are is doing immense damage to men’s work and the creation of value by men.

Women in men’s positions subtract value. Women in powerful male positions subtract enormous amounts of value. Men at work get paid for creating value, and are forced to pay women for destroying the value that men create.

The reason for female under representation among top engineers, scientists, etc, is that women are slightly less competent on average and have a narrower distribution.

The reason for female under representation among CEOs is moral and emotional, unrelated to competence. Women are very competent managers. A woman has always managed my affairs, and generally done so very well, but women are uncomfortable running things without a strong alpha male supervising them and approving their work from time to time. If they don’t get the supervision that they emotionally need from someone masculine, patriarchal, and sexy, they start acting maliciously, and self destructively, running the operation off the road and into the ground in a subconscious effort to force an alpha male to appear and give them a well deserved beating. The problem is that if she does not get the supervision that she emotionally needs, she will maliciously run the operation into the ground, like a wife married to a beta male husband whom she despises, destroying the family assets and the lives of their children.

Happens every single time, as near to every single time as makes no difference, no matter how smart and competent and hard working they are. Exceptions are so rare as to be nonexistent for all practical purposes.


I would explain the fact that a company with a female founder was one eighth as likely to get follow on funding by the fact that absolutely none of them should have received funding, and the only reason that any of them got any follow on funding was that the venture capitalists wanted to deny that anything was wrong. The official and enforced explanation is that it is proof of irrational hatred and misogyny by venture capitalists. And if you doubt this, you obviously must hate women.

So, to decide between these two explanations, let us look at company acquisitions. When venture capitalists fund a company, they intend it that if it succeeds it will be acquired by a big company. If a company is not acquired, the venture capitalists have pissed away their money. Most times they lose, sometimes they win big.

So, that eleven percent of companies with all male founders were acquired represents the venture capitalists winning one time in nine.

With all female founders, they won one time in two hundred and seventy. With all female founders they had only one thirtieth the chance as with all male founders.

One might suppose that this indicates that women are one thirtieth as likely to be able to operate a company as a man, but obviously this conclusion is absurd. The companies must have been acquired for political brownie points, not because they were being operated successfully. It is as plain as the nose on your face that women are absolutely disastrous when given this kind of authority, but official sources will deny what is spitting in their faces and kicking them in the balls, so how do we check this? Are they insane, or am I insane?

Answer: Look at companies with both male and female founders. If the reason is misogyny, then the female founder will have no effect, because the purchasers will assume she is only there for decoration and to warm the bed of the real founders.

So, if misogyny, companies with mixed founders should be purchased at roughly the same rate as companies with all male founders.

If the problem is that women are just naturally incompetent as CEOs, then companies with mixed founders should be purchased at a somewhat lower rate, as the male founders carry the female founders on their backs while the purported female founders paint their nails, powder their faces, and discuss their most recent booty call from Jeremy Meeks.

If, however, the problem is that women in power just invariably and uniformly act like feral animals, as if they had been raised by apes in the jungle, then zero companies with mixed founders will be purchased. If the problem is that the female founders need to be placed in cages and put on leashes, but the male founders are not allowed to do so, then zero companies with mixed founders will be purchased. If the problem is that these days women are no longer subject to the restraints of civilization, then zero companies with mixed founders will be purchased.

Well, guess what.

If a woman has a strong husband who is himself wealthy and powerful, and she washes his dishes and sorts his socks, then she can be a good CEO. Today, however, husbands are generally weak, and therefore competent female CEOs correspondingly rare.

Females can no more do large group socialization than they can chop wood with an axe, or clear a path through the jungle with a machete. Females in or near positions of power have a disastrous effect on the social cohesion of the group to which they belong, on the propensity of group members to cooperate with each other, on the asabiyyah of the group, on the group’s capability to pursue goals in common.

It is a standard psychiatric finding that women are supposedly more agreeable than men, and in very important ways they are.

If tell a woman I have mislaid my keys, she will find them. In this sense women really are more agreeable than men.

If I tell a woman to get me coffee, she will get me coffee. In this sense women really are more agreeable than men.

If I slap a woman on the backside, she will yelp and jump, but then smile and laugh. In this sense women really are more agreeable than men.

But who is it that interrupts the boss?

It is always a woman. Yes, she interrupts in a supposedly friendly, supportive, and agreeable manner, but interrupting is in reality unfriendly, undermines him, and is in fact disagreeable.

Women are catty. Two women are friends, three women are a contest to see which two will become friends. Women are disruptive. They never stop shit testing their bosses. If a woman interrupts her boss, talks over her boss, even though her interruption is supposedly friendly, supportive, and all that, as it always supposedly is, she is disrupting and damaging the organization.

Women take advantage of and abuse restrictions on physical violence, and other rules commanding prosocial behavior, which abuse undermines prosocial behavior and impairs large group cooperation between males. Women are bad for and disruptive of any large group that attempts to cooperate to get something done. They undermine asabiyya, throwing sand in the wheels just for the hell of it. They are always throwing down shit tests to find which male is alpha enough to subdue their bad behavior, always disrupting, always looking for a well deserved spanking.

The psychiatric category of “agreeableness” is cooked to support the doctrine that women are wonderful. It conflates going along with bad behavior, with going along with good behavior. It declares resisting bad behavior to be disagreeable, while ruthlessly and cynically imposing on good behavior is supposedly not disagreeable.

Yes, women really are wonderful in their proper sphere. In power, they are only tolerable to the extent that strong males keep them in line.

A more accurate analysis of female behavior is that females are bad at, and bad for, large group social dynamics. Female or substantially female businesses fail, often fail very badly. Women are better at one on one dynamics than men – all women, all the time. Worse at large group dynamics than men. All women, all the time. All women are like that.

It is obvious to me that women are having a devastating effect on male efforts to create wealth, and I have long been puzzled at other people’s inability to see what is not merely right in front of their faces, but repeatedly spitting in their face and then slapping them.

A business appoints a female boss because progress. She acts in an angry hostile manner, infuriating customers and vital employees, disruptively knocking the business off track instead of keeping it on track, as if the business was a beta husband, and she wanted a divorce with the house, the children, and alimony. Business goes down the tubes. No one notices. Supposedly the business ran into mysterious head winds that have absolutely no connection to the new boss whatsoever.

When males aggress, they get in each other’s faces, they shout, there is always a hint of the possibility it might turn physical, a suggestion of physical menace. Women aggress and disrupt in a more passive manner, and these days we are not allowed to react to female aggression by shouting at them and getting in their faces, by menacing them. It used to be, within living memory, within my memory, that female misbehavior was met with a male response that hinted at the possibility that she might get spanked, put in a metaphorical cage, or put in metaphorical or literal irons, just as an aggressively misbehaving male got then and gets today a response that hints at the possibility of a punch in the face or imprisonment. Women today therefore routinely aggress and disrupt in a manner I find shocking, crazy, disgraceful, bizarre, and extreme, and do so with shocking and disgraceful impunity, as if within my lifetime women came to be possessed by demons, and everyone is walking around like zombies pretending to not notice. Recall in the infamous interview, Jordan Peterson looks away from Kathy before calling out her bad behavior, because if he looked her in the face while calling out her bad behavior it would have been socially unacceptable, because women are supposedly wonderful.

A male quarrels with a male. They get in each other’s faces, you feel that violence might happen, or at least one of them will call security and have the other shown the door. They have the body language of two male goats about to butt heads over possession of a female goat.

A female quarrels with a male. She interrupts him and talks over him in a supposedly friendly and supportive way “So what you are really saying is …”

A male who intends to aggress against another male who is ignoring him intrudes into the other male’s space and just plain gets close enough that the male he is aggressing against has to drop what he is doing and pay attention. Again we see the body language of two male goats about to butt heads over a female goat.

A female who intends to aggress against a male who is ignoring her also intrudes, but not so close, and proceeds to interrupt what he is doing and distract him with some halfway plausible excuse as to why he has to stop what he is doing and pay attention to her, which excuse is something that in theory should not irritate him, and he has trouble understanding why he is irritated, and why she lacks any real interest in the nominal justification that she supposedly has for demanding his attention and interrupting his activities. Supposedly she is helping him in a friendly pleasant nice way, though her “help” is hostile, nasty, angry, disruptive and entirely unwanted, and she ignores his forceful denials that he needs any such “help”.

We need a society where women feel that if they act like Cathy Newman did in that infamous interview with Jordan Peterson, they might get slapped in the face, or sent to the kitchen and the bedroom and restricted from getting out except on a short leash. But if Jordan had responded to her bad behavior by getting in her face as if she was a man, they would probably have called security and tossed him out. Notice that whenever Jordan calls out Cathy Newman’s bad behavior he looks away and gives a little laugh. If he called out her bad behavior while looking at her, it would have been socially unacceptable. What needs to be socially acceptable is that her husband should have given her a slap in the face for publicly disgracing his family with her bad behavior. The same government policies that helicoptering women into powerful positions are allowing them to act badly and destructively in those positions.

As affirmative action makes the differences between men and women starkly and dramatically visible to everyone, at the same time it makes it a criminal offense to notice, or even think about, those differences.

A woman in power is like a woman who finds herself the breadwinner, and her husband is a kitchen bitch, like a dog who finds himself the alpha male of the household, like a woman who intrudes into a males space and proceeds to feminize it and make it hostile to males. She behaves badly in an unconscious effort to smoke the alpha male out of hiding by provoking him to give her a beating.

Supposedly the reason there are so few female CEOs is because of evil sexism, not because boards keep appointing female CEOs and those CEOs keep driving their companies into the ditch. From time to time some big important Harvard expert informs us that female headed or female founded companies do better than male companies, but they will not show us their data, which data conspicuously flies in the face of common sense, anecdote, and casual observation. And if you ask to see their data, you are a racist sexist islamophobic misogynist, and the only reason you could be asking such an obviously hateful question is because you just hate women and are trying to harm them by asking hate questions about hate facts. Also, you are anti science and a global warming denier. We ignorant hateful hicks who keep asking to see the evidence that women can do a man’s job are just like those ignorant hateful hicks who keep asking to see the evidence for global warming. We are anti science, because the science is settled.

Well, fortunately, a surprisingly truthful feminist chick went looking for the data.

Her graphics were truthful, but somewhat misleading, as she de-emphasized and partially hid the most important and dramatic datum, so I edited her graphics for clarity. The graphic at the start of this post is mine, but based on her data and graphics.

Jim, Jim's Blog 14 Comments [2/11/2018 6:26:21 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 25 40 | top