1 2 3 4 5 6 | bottom
Quote# 139065

People always say, “Little kids can’t consent to sex. They love attention and affection, so when adults try to mess around with them, they can’t say no. But then it damages them.” Isn’t that how it is with Stacies? They can’t say no to Chad. It’s been shown that even after they have posted a bunch of stuff to Facebook about how Chad is no good for them and they’re totally done with Chad and not gonna fall for that anymore, as soon as Chad shows up again, they can’t help but spread their legs for him. They’re totally addicted to his cock.

So basically he’s raping them, since he’s taking advantage of their lack of mental capacity. This means if you see Chad with a Stacy in public, you have the right to intERvene to rescue her. It’s no different than if you were to see some guy with candy, inviting kids to go for a ride in his van. Are you just gonna stand there and let this victimization go on?! How could you live with yourself, when you had two knives, a Glock 34 handgun, two SIG Sauer P226 handguns, and a BMW 328i Coupé with which you could have spared Stacy the fate of being sexually assaulted by this predator?

Of course, it would be pointless to save her from just that one Chad, rather than from ALL Chads who might seek to prey upon her, so therefore it’s necessary to hide her someplace, such as your basement, where no Chads can find her. Of course, in addition to watching out for her safety while she’s in this place of refuge, you’ll also need to look after her other needs, including food, clothing, shelter, sex, etc.

And you know how it is with kids and others who lack mental capacity — sometimes when you try to feed them, they don’t want to accept the food. They try to spit it out. So you just have to force it down their throat. Also, sometimes kids don’t want to be vaccinated, so when they try to run away from the needle, you just have to hold them down so it can be shoved into their body anyway.

It’s the same way with Stacies and incel cock! As her caregiver, sometimes you’re gonna have to make her do stuff that’s for her own good, even if she doesn’t understand or realize it. Remember, you’re dealing with a mentally handicapped individual; compassion demands that as her guardian, you take charge and not just let her follow whatever whims are, in your judgment, not going to lead her down the right path.

Haven’t you had the experience sometimes too as a kid where your parents made you dress up in a suit and tie and go attend some boring classical concert with them because they wanted you to become cultured? That’s really not that much different than making Stacy wear a crotchless diaper and go with you into your erotic torture chamber so she can experience culture (specifically, rape culture).

Kids also sometimes have to be sent to school against their will. But of course home-schooling is an alternative. Likewise, it’s your responsibility to make sure that Stacy has an opportunity to receive an education, including sex education. There may be some depraved shit that even Chad never got around to teaching her, and thus it is your role to offer remedial learning. If she refuses to cooperate, then of course there is nothing wrong with administering corporal punishment so she can be brought up with the proper discipline.

Nathan Larson, Wordpress 2 Comments [7/22/2018 2:37:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 139014

Re: Karen Straughan on why Mens Rights is so difficult.

(DavidByron2)
You need to have a minimal amount of sympathy for a protest to work and men don't have it. It's the same as you wouldn't try to hold a rally for the rights of rapists or pedophiles and expect much good from it. Well feminism has made men about as sympathetic as rapists and pedophiles and often identified all men as rapists and pedophiles.

Another analogy would be like getting Jews to hold a big rally in Nazi Germany. It would be seen as disgusting and it would be attacked as dangerous.

(biscuitgravy)
The problem is exacerbated by the fact that men don't even have sympathy for themselves. Men are the most effective and motivated haters and killers of men. That subverts all of the traditional self-interest routes to popular organization.

The only thing that makes a regular guy organize with MRAs is total alienation by a gynocentric society. Not even facing death will make him leave gynocentrism in some cases. Guys volunteer to die all the time to protect a woman's honor. They have to meet with something totally intolerable. Something much greater than themselves, to even think of addressing their own problems. Usually, it's their children. But Feminists have secured the right to those as well.

(tenchineuro)

It's why when we approach the mainstream, we have to frame a LOT of men's rights issues in terms of how helping men helps women and children, or society, rather than how we should be helping men for their own sake. Convince people that men are utilities who should be cared for and maintained so they can and are willing continue to be of use


This is how we got where we are now, by being of use and not people in our own right. Men are tools, not human beings, I won't agree with that and that approach won't get men treated as anything but tools.

I have a great deal of respect for Karen, but I think she's off the beam with this.

(0x123d)

why no disobedience


Because we have jobs.

why is MRA so unpalatable


Because of how our species evolved. Girls > women > boys > pets > inanimate objects > men.Because of how our species evolved. Girls > women > boys > pets > inanimate objects > men.

(Elvick)
Think it's more women > girls > pets > boys > objects > men

With an argument that objects could come before boys even. And depending on the age range we're talking for "boy" it's as easy as domestic violence shelters turning away boys of a certain age because they could be "dangerous".

Women can make more children. Nature didn't guarantee girls would make it to child bearing years. So women were more valuable than girls. Women having more children was a more reasonable assumption than girls not dying from disease. It made sense.

Hell, vagina monologues has the rape of a 13 year old girl by a 20-something year old woman who plies the barely teenager with alcohol. And it's lauded as some great feminist text. A certain vile celebrity whose name I won't utter, molested her sister for years and she still has a career in Hollywood. The internet hates her, and rightfully spreads the information every time she's given a platform somewhere. But it hardly undoes anything.

Probably more examples. But women are definitely placed above even girls.

(mwobuddy)
There's actually a few reasons why its so difficult and its easy to sum up.

Conflation. "oh, so you're against women"? A typical argument.

Denial. "you think men don't have equal rights or protection in law, that's cute".

imprecise language. "you think there is no rape culture but I know plenty of women who've been raped". Both can be true, but rape culture is proven by "rape victims" while your definition of rape culture is "a culture that tells people explicitly to go out and rape women". Imprecise language is a problem for all sides in any argument, and is perhaps the most important issue. Its why you absolutely need to ask someone to declare specifically what they mean when they use a term or a phrase. You may be accused of pedantry, but this is often a tactic of obfuscation to say your side is inherently illegitimate.

These three are used in a motte and bailey tactic of every single men's rights debate.

(Wisemanner)
I think carefully thought out resistance to the system will have an effect, and there is some evidence that this is increasing; examples being men refusing to go to the aid of women; MGTOW; and men refusing to marry.

I would suggest at least the following be practised.

Pay as little tax as possible. Most tax is spent on women, with, in the UK, about twice as much spent on women's healthcare, and three times as much spend on research into their cancers. (Even though women live longer.)

Do not go to the aid of women, The police will arrest you in an instant if there is any mistake or confusion.

Do not help the police except where you are actually helping another male or yourself. These are, after all, the enablers and helpers of feminism, and the thugs who hammer a man's door at six am simply on the word of a woman.

Do not marry. The whole system is rigged to get the husband to pay the living expenses of the wife even when she no longer wants to have anything to do with him.

5.Do not vote Socialist in the UK. The other parties are not much better, but the Labour Party is feminist-infested.

There is almost certainly much more.

(lacandib)
The civil disobedience/protest route could work but it would have to led by women.

(The_Best_01)

Why?


Because evidently, society listens more to women. In the best-case scenario, it would be led by men and women.

(Elvick)
Because men are viewed as dangerous in those circumstances... look at the arguments against men's spaces and clubs. It's always about how it's dangerous. And that's just a private space or a club on campus.

An entire protest filled of men wouldn't go over any differently. Did you even read Karen's comment? She talks about how society views men as dangerous in there.

various MRAs, r/MensRights 0 Comments [7/22/2018 2:27:30 PM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 139083

Will Islam and The Muslims End Feminism?

Sometimes I imagine a dystopic future, a future where Feminism wins. Things slowly get worse all around the world. Societies start to fall apart. Like a domino effect. Europe falls, then the USA and Canada fall, then Latin America falls. Females and Beta males made all the decisions that led to their own destruction. The first problem came as a wave of diseases.

Females are now full of diseases, after decades of having unprotected and uncontrolled sex with multiple men.

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...orrhoea-antibiotic-crisis-drug-resistant-bugs
http://www.foxnews.com/health/2018/04/02/untreatable-super-gonorrhea-case-could-be-tip-iceberg.html

One after another, many STD's became untreatable. And the STD's weakened the females and Chad's immune systems. Then the super viruses started appearing. Medics around the world were in awe and shock as the International Medic Community declared the new HIV "Invincible". The new HIV virus was now immune to all antibiotics and all treatments. It was literally Invincible and deadly. It's mortality rate was 100%, and it acted frightening fast, some of the infected died within hours.

Most Chads died, they were some of the first to fall. Since they were the ones having all the sex. The Chad population, started to diminish even further. Now less than 0.1% of the population were Chads. The female population also died exponentially.

After Female hypergamy reached it's peak, death followed. The politicians in the right claimed that the ones responsible for it were the gays and the illegal immigrants. The politicians in the left claimed that the ones responsible were men and the patriarchy. Again no one says the truth. The betas know that the real responsible for all this death were the females.

But they are desperate for sex. As such they free the females of the responsibility of their actions, in hope of getting sex. They expect that their good deeds of shielding the females of the consequences of their own actions would get them laid. Another fatal mistake.

An economic collapse comes, with the many deaths caused by the diseases, the remaining working force is not enough to keep society going.

The disease ridden females, now seek the Betas, in hope of being provided for by them, as they always have been. The Beta population, eager to get sex from the females, after the vacuum left by the many Chad's deaths, also becomes sick.

The only ones still healthy are Incels. They are the ones who survived. Unaffected by the waves of disease. Their celibacy salved them. A miracle. The females now seek them, but they accomplish nothing. Unlike the gullible betas, the Incels are a lot more suspicious and hard to .

Islam has now successfully turned Europe into a caliphate. It was now known as Eurabia, and the law was Sharia. Females there were now treated far more strictly, after the Muslims saw the epidemic that ravaged the USA. The muslim females would remain in the house, and were prohibited to even talk with another men that was not her father, her brother or her husband. Breaking that law was punishable with death by public beating.

The Americas are now ready to be plundered. Yet the muslims don't do it. Afraid of the diseases. They will wait, for when the dust has settled. They praise Allah, for sending pestilence upon their enemies. In their eyes, their God was the one who brought the illness to the americans, no doubt.

This is part one, if you guys liked it I will make a part two. What do you guys think? Is it close to reality?

Arthas93, incels.me 1 Comments [7/22/2018 1:15:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139080

We have Albert Einstein, Tesla, Newton, Plato, etc.This is the most famous, most influental person that females have produced in the last 2000+ years
[Selfie of a naked woman]

Getlooksordie, incels.me 2 Comments [7/22/2018 1:15:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139078

Black women are the lowest sexual status group in all of society. A black woman who somehow scores a white man knows she's won the lottery, and won't rock the boat for the most part. Relationships work best with a submissive woman.

Mortalsisyphus, Reddit 5 Comments [7/22/2018 1:15:20 PM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 139071

Feminism/Women Working/Hookup Culture has been an absolute nightmare. My 35yo oldcel observations on the state of Modern Women.

at the age now where I can see what is happening in these Nightmare Times, meaning I can see how life has ended up for the majority of my peers.

Some of my observations:

A ton of 40 something women going through midlife crisis and throwing their husbands out like fucking garbage.
Young 20 something women who are crazy liberal/sjw/pc freaks. They have colored hair and think that Donald Trump has "done" something to them on a personal level.
Women in their 40's who are childless and think that they can still have kids safely.
A shit ton of women in their 30's who are single mothers.

And as for my peers from HS/College(35yo):

I see a bunch of women who do have husbands but have 0 kids. Why did they even bother getting married. These are the so called "Career Women". They think some stupid fucking job is more rewarding/satisfying/gratifying than being a mother to a bunch of beautiful kids.

I also see a bunch of women that have only 1 fucking kid. 35yo and only 1 fucking kid. Back in the 1950's these chicks would of had 4-6 kids. And of course all of em did the alpha bucks and married some beta schmuck.

And then the rest of em are single Roasties who have jumped from cock to cock. 35yo: no husband, no kids, living in a shitty apartment but they have "Muh Career".

As for the men:

A lot of guys who have bastard kids. These dudes are paying Child Support.

Guys who have married below their level. A 4-5 guy marrying a 3-4 chick. They would of had looks-matched women in the past.

And a lot of the guys are single. The majority of the single guys are working shitty jobs. They aren't ugly or anything but they have limited money. I'm guessing these guys LDAR with their hobbies.

bluecollarCEL, incels.me 2 Comments [7/22/2018 9:13:37 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139043

They are inferior. That said I would trade life with Stacy in a heartbeat and lesbianmaxx

Being a foid means everything is handed to you.

NEETAndTidy, incels.me 3 Comments [7/21/2018 1:57:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139042

You guys need to seriously view women below men, if you haven't already.

I see it in the misogyny posts, but in other posts you inadvertently reveal your lack of sincerity through feelings of inferiority to women. Please understand that we are right. Women are not on the same plane of existence of men. They are below us. Inferior.

As Dawkins would say women are "survival machines - robot vehicles blindly programmed to preserve the selfish molecules known as genes." They are designed to reproduce with the most attractive or dominant man to maximize the replication and survival of their genetic material. Men have the same genetic programming but most men have the ability to reach higher states of consciousness that go outside this primitive dance. I'm talking about shamans, monks, the dali lama, witch doctors, gnostics, etc etc. Women don't have this same capability and there is no major religion that has allowed women to take part in their ceremonies.

The jews say a prayer every morning that goes

"Blessed are you, Hashem, King of the Universe, for not having made me a Gentile."

"Blessed are you, Hashem, King of the Universe, for not having made me a slave."

Blessed are you, Hashem, King of the Universe, for not having made me a woman."

VileGeneticTrash, incels.me 3 Comments [7/21/2018 1:57:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 139039

I would have refused to believe young women who called themselves Christians who wanted to marry a spiritually-minded man. As an ordained minister, I have witnessed time after time how Church Girls choose the Bad Boys over the Good Guys. I was a Good Guy. I was never a Bad Boy. I have never been drunk. I have never used drugs. I have never fornicated. I was told numerous times by such a Christian woman that I was the most honorable man that she had ever known - yet such a woman rarely would date me even once, much less twice.

Such did not find me boring; such loved to spend time with me. But such did not want me as a romantic interest. Most of the women I sought to court married males who merely attended church and went through the motions in order to capture a nice wife; several of those trophies are now divorced - once, sometimes twice. Some of them became abused spouses by these counterfeit Christians. Meanwhile, I remain an adult virgin, since my profession of faith denies me fornication as an outlet.

I live in a culture that mocks virginity, especially in a male. (My virility was mocked - both behind my back, and to my face - by some of the above pew warmers, when they realized that I was actually chaste.) I came across a self-published book years ago:

“How Women Choose Men: Why Nice Guys Finish Last”. It is neither vulgar nor derogatory: It is simply honest. His thesis is simple: Do not listen to what women say; watch what women do. Women consistently marry what are in the vernacular called assholes. (This includes some of the ordained men I have known.) They do so because they equate such men with dominance and confidence; they do so because they equate such men with animal virility; they do so because they equate such men with a challenge that requires to be reformed; they do so because they equate Christian virtue with a lack of ambition.

I think in particular that they see a real Christian man as both no challenge and too much of a challenge: A real Christian man does not need to be reformed and redeemed by a woman’s carnal love; yet a real Christian man will challenge a woman to live up to her highest Christian commitment. That is a lose/lose proposition to a fallen female. In short, they do so because they are sinful. Women are every bit as sinful and corrupt as men. Every bit. I assume I will be denounced for my admitted - at times - bitterness. So be it. As I said, I am being candid.

YogicCowboy, Free Republic 6 Comments [7/21/2018 12:30:31 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 139035

Yeah, young whites are already getting out of cities and forming their own communities. Gentrification is too expensive for them, especially if they want to have kids.

Some of them are starting or trying to start intentional communities, and coming up with all sorts of complicated schemes to try to ensure they live with like-minded people.

Personally, I think a lot of them are naive and highly unlikely to succeed, but I sympathize.

The real key to successful communities is not the communes the idealistic ones tend to envision, but rather old fashioned fraternally organized, faith-based communities, AKA patriarchy.

Bill P, Unz 1 Comments [7/21/2018 12:28:06 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 139027

They are most likely just trying to eliminate all shame in western cultures. Shame (i.e. being held accountable for your actions) feels bad. Women operate on feelings alone - it is all that matters to them when making a decision. Since shame feels bad, women feel bad whenever people are shamed for degeneracy (such as premarital sex or cheating).

tl;dr females support homosexuality for the same reason they support sex-positivity, body-positivity, etc.

VisVoi, incels.me 4 Comments [7/21/2018 10:51:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Katie

Quote# 139019

The comments are pure gold, and the retarded cunt exemplifies WHY females are the problem and that the men have little if anything to do with it.

Females DO NOT belong on the battlefield, or in the boardroom, and thanks to feminism they are utterly worthless in the kitchen and a criminal liability in any bedroom.



T0000009, Reddit - r/MGTOW 1 Comments [7/21/2018 10:49:57 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 139009

the difference between wlw and straight men is that we see women as women. not sexual objects. and we see their bodies as bodies. not sexual objects. and that's the tea!

#lesbian #gay #bi #bisexual #wlw #women #straight #men #lgbt

kennedylesbian, Tumblr 2 Comments [7/21/2018 4:01:25 AM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Thanos6

Quote# 138986

Woman tries to hang her child and grievously injures many in her attempt to flee. Is completely let off the hook because "her children need her"

(ArmondDillo)
Well she can murder them while still inside her, it's her body. After they're out, it's still her right, they came from her body. There are university professors which argue that murdering babies, ones that have been born, is moral. Feminists agree. Hillary Clinton was all for it.

(Sbeast)
She's proven by her behaviour she is not safe around children, and will try to murder them even though they are innocent, and yet the judge thinks they need to be together. WTF are they smoking!?!?

(The_Best_01)
They're smoking good ol' gynocentric bias. It's a hell of a drug kids.

(mrmcdude)
Well, you saw the picture of her crying in court. What was the judge supposed to do? Hold her responsible?

(VantagePoint2018)
To be fair, the claim isn't just "she's a woman" they are claiming abuse and mental illness nullify any ulterior motive.

"Karia’s young adult son from a previous marriage, Denys, wrote a letter to the court alleging that his father was abusive to Karia over many years since he met her and married her through a Ukrainian agency. He wrote that he would “menace” her with a gun and commit other acts of physical abuse"

At least according to her son and his audio recordings in this Star Tribune article that was posted here hours ago.

http://www.startribune.com/minneapolis-daycare-provider-who-hanged-toddler-from-noose-to-be-sentenced/488290231/

(Sbeast)
According to that logic, anyone can try to murder children and not go to prison as long as they have experienced some abuse in their life...

(ronin_in_the_wind)
That was the premise of a recent article advocating that women shouldn't go to prison because most crimes committed by women are a response to past abuses... the implication being that guys commit crimes because they're inherently evil.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/01/why-we-should-close-womens-prisons-and-treat-their-crimes-more-fairly

(Luchadorgreen)
Misandric BS. The truth is that most people who commit crimes have probably had abuse at some point in their history.

(The_Best_01)
Written by the Gulag Guardian, no less. What a surprise.

(_pulsar)
Fuck that shit. I can see it being relevant if she murdered the dude who allegedly abused her, but she tied a noose around a child's neck and hung him up to die. I don't care what other people have done to you, if you hang a fucking child you should rot in prison forever.

(HeForeverBleeds)
This kind of thing honestly pisses me off more than anything

I posted about it here before, but when I was 5, my parents separated and my mother was given custody automatically, even though my dad was also trying to get custody and despite the fact that my mother was convicted for sexually abusing my dad, since he was 13-years-old when I was born, 12 when my mother got pregnant. Needless to say, my life with her was a living Hell

Anyone who hurts or abuses a child has already proven herself to be a danger to children, so obviously is an unfit parent. It's common sense that should go without saying. Yet this bullshit "children belong with their mothers" and "women are naturally good with kids" is so deeply ingrained that even pieces of shit like this cunt and my mother are allowed to raise children

Meanwhile, good men are being denied even joint custody

(Kyle_Fischer)
Oh good! So, if a woman ever did that to my son and I killed her, then I wouldn’t be sentenced to any prison because my son needs me. Amiright?

(GingerRazz)

I think this is not necessarily about men’s rights but rather about the justice system being fucked up. This goes far beyond „women get more sympathy from judges“, I don’t think it happened just because she’s a woman


Give me an example where something like this happened to a man. Give me one example where a man gets murderously violent at his child and then gets mercy because his kids need their dad.

I don't know of any such examples, but I remember multiple cases similar to this where the accused/guilty is a woman.

various MRAs, r/MensRights 2 Comments [7/19/2018 2:07:48 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 138984

Barack Obama says "men have been getting on my nerves lately" asks "what's wrong with us?"

(lostapwbm)
I tried to archive this garbage, but it didn't take.

“Women in particular, by the way, I want you to get more involved,” he said. “Because men have been getting on my nerves lately.”


Really? Because I'm practically in love with you.

Obama made the remark during a speech to the African Leadership Academy. “Everyday I read the newspaper and just think like ‘Brothers, what’s wrong with you guys? What’s wrong with us? We’re violent, we’re bullying. Just not handling our business,” he said.


Yes, let's learn from Barack Obama about violence and bullying.

THE WEDDING THAT BECAME A FUNERAL: U.S. STILL SILENT ONE YEAR ON FROM DEADLY YEMEN DRONE STRIKE

DRONE STRIKES UNDER OBAMA KILLED UP TO 117 CIVILIANS WORLDWIDE, INTELLIGENCE REPORT CLAIMS

Obama added Wednesday that “empowering more women” will “lead to some better policies.”


I disagree.

(fractureegg)
At one point during Obama's first term he was bombing 7 different countries at once. While radical leftists and some right-libertarians remained true to their anti-war principles, most Democrats suddenly stopped caring simply because a Democrat was in office. A similar thing happened under George W. Bush, when many Republicans suddenly stopped caring about constitutional protections. Tribalism is a helluva drug.

Like many male feminists Obama may just be projecting his own deviant sexual thoughts onto men as a whole. More likely he is simply a psychopath (like most politicians) and doesn't care one way or the other -- he's just being PC. In any case it's striking that the some of the most powerful MEN in the world are now making explicitly misandric comments in public even as virtually every major institution has become anti-male. Quite the "patriarchy" we have here.

Actually I think it's wrong to compare feminist societies to patriarchies; under patriarchies women are subject to paternalistic sexism, but they still have a number of profound privileges that males lack (being protected for example). Feminist societies produce no privileges whatsoever for males, and seek to eliminate all dignity from the lives of men and boys.

(TheMythof_Feminism)
I found it very difficult to understand why the U.S. re-elected that piece of garbage.

Obama will go down in history as the worst president the U.S. ever had, bar none.

(Lupinfujiko)
This upsets me.

With influenceable boys watching no less. Boys who grow up to be men will somehow be "inconvenient".

What the fuck is that.

Are we "getting on your nerves lately" Obama?

Is it because we like to assert fact or logic into our conversations?

Is it because we disagree with your disingenuous "1 in 5" debacle?

Is it because we pointed out the truth about the "wage gap"?

What a terrible, disingenuous, pandering shithead comment to make.

If a world leader had said that about women, it would be National news. It would spark a revolt. It would be "proof" of the "patriarchy".

Obama and the Democrats continue to disappoint.

various MRAs, r/MensRights 5 Comments [7/19/2018 2:04:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138983

Was it the (((propaganda)))? The Pill? The refined factory-made carbs? The SCALE? The sexual market chaos? The enabling thirsty betas? The Diversity™?

Maybe all of the above. Whatever the foul source, our women are flying off a cliffside with a vengeance, and taking their homelands with them. We either collar them, or allow them to continue steering the ship straight into the rocky shoals.

WILL YOU MAKE YOUR DECISION FOR THE PATRIARCHY?

***

Anonymous probes,

Why, prey tell, Mr. Heartiste, do you think this girl on some Alpha’s boat aping him by wearing his hat flew off the cliff?

Take a few minutes and peruse your former GF’s on facebook to see what became of them.

I don’t. It hurts too much to see the wreckage wrought.


I get you. Alpha widowhood and its cuntsequences are another feature of a recklessly liberated sexual market. The detritus of damaged thots.

CH, Chateau Heartiste 5 Comments [7/19/2018 1:58:47 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 138966

[Context: Infamous Lolcow ADF/Isabel Araujo/Ahuviya Harel/Phil apparently got SRS surgery, this is in a KF thread about a picture of the results 7 weeks post-op. A few other posters show some ignorance, but this guy was the most fundie about it]

Why in society have we come to accept instead of helping people with body dis-morphia through mental stability, instead we give in to these unnatural desires to mutilate their genitals? What is this madness?

[on the next page]
Are you telling me that turning your dick inside out into your guts is not the most natural sounding vagina? What are you a Nazi?

[now a couple pages later a user called NoFeline Says]
Isn't Phil's made out of a piece of his colon? Yeah. Despite how nasty that sounds, it's much less of a horror show than inverting the penis...and the botch-jobs on that are much, much worse.

[To which our fundie says]
Are you so desentizied or "tolerant" that you find inverted your penis and mutilating it NOT botching your fucking body?

[bananaliquerelips says]
unpopular opinion (I guess) but its an okay vagina for a fake one. At first glance it doesn't appear abnormal. upon further inspection, sure, but once anyone gets to 4th base if thats not what they're expecting then they're deluded.

it does look smelly though. douche daily is my advice.

[Zippy responds]
How about not mutilating your genitals because of a mental illness? How about that?

[User Ginger Piglet quotes Zippy]
For people who are TRUE AND HONEST trans, i.e. not Phil, and suffer from actual gender dysphoria, this is the treatment for that illness. However because of its very nature (viz. this thread), that's why they have piles of "gatekeeping" in front of it.

[Zippy posts again]
The treatment is to lead to life that most likely will make your mental state worse than before, look I was liberal and "free-thinking" like you once, but it's common sense that this is in their head. They are the sex they are born with and that will never change.

[GP again]
If you are Phil, or one of the many other transtrenders we cover, yes. However. The trans people that actually put the effort in to pass and go through all the steps and so forth are generally fairly well adjusted.

Basically, if you want to gauge how truly and honestly trans someone is, think about this - how quickly can I clock them? The shorter a time it takes, the more likely they are to screech at some quack until he wolverine-claws a segment out their groin.

[ZZ again, getting more agitated]
You people are insane, you have given these mentally ill people the go through to fuck up their lives forever because you think sex is a social construct. Will someone just nuke the Western world already?

[A moderator named Ravenor shows up, quoting Piglet]
There is also the Kiwi Statistic, we have a disproportionate number of Transpeople involved in the forums who are active and respected members of the community we don't hate transpeople far from it, we just have a distate for people using being Trans as an excuse for doing a runner from responsibility or accountability.

[ZZ again, this time getting sassy with the mod]
Kiwifarms has a disproportionate amount of crazy people? Who woulda thunk?

But yeah to state for the record I don't "hate" trannies, I just think they are insane and they created this disgusting degenerate culture that has even poisoned children. That you can just be whatever sex you want because there was that one time you put on a dress, or you play with boys toys. I hope they get actual help instead of these horrible procedures.

ZippyZoopa, Kiwifarms 3 Comments [7/18/2018 3:28:18 AM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 138965

Just Along For The Ride


Fine, as soon as women drop the 'men are sex-hungry, mindless rapist pigs' ethic. And really, how are you supposed to flirt if now more than ever a woman can get you thrown in jail with ease (cuz' we #believewomen) if you so much as look at her wrong? I know incels are delusional dickheads, but unfortunately the notion that males are increasingly discriminated against while women get a free pass on more or less everything is not all that far-fetched. You can see it wherever you look...sexist jokes against women? Huge taboo. Sexist jokes against men? A-okay, encouraged even. Men being shallow and entitled? How dare they. Women being shallow and entitled? They're strong and independent who refuse to bow to the patriarchy. So on and so forth. It's just that nobody is willing to discuss this in a mature way, because as soon as a male brings it up, he's immediately drowned out by a chorus of 'AH THE WIDDLE MANBABY IS UPSET ABOUT NOT GETTING HIS PEEPEE WET' and 'oh, you're no longer free to harass women without consequences, poor you'. And if a woman brings it up (which very rarely happens, because let's not beat around the bush, most women are more than happy to milk their eternal victim status coupled with their newfound priviliges for all it's worth), she's labeled and 'internalised misogyinist' and 'gender traitor'. This whole gender war stopped being about equality a long, long time ago. Now it's pretty much all about female supremacy.

Anon, SSTDT 13 Comments [7/18/2018 3:06:23 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138963

First of all women have been given the same rights as men in modern society. But the problem is they can't handle responsibility. When something doesn't go right women blame the patriarchy. But it was men that gave the vote to you. You'll never accept that women are inferiour. If we gave planet earth to women and all men left to mars or colonised some planet in the future, the would probably go back to stone age. I'm not joking. Where are all the scientist women?? If you continue this disrespect of man's achievements you only strengthen our arguments for why we need to make women obsolete using technology. (ie automation)?

It's illegal for women to abort without PERMISSION from the FATHER where I live :). I love how you think getting pregnant means women invented physics LOL, btw you carry the baby but the DNA is half of the man's who impregnates the woman. So nice fucking try. I bet you think men should have to pay for half of the abortion when you think it's all the woman's choice and body? Do you have any capacity to understand philosophy or is that part of your brain taken up by shoes and makeup??

YOYOYO meneayem, YouTube 2 Comments [7/18/2018 3:03:01 AM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 138962

Best of matriarchy: relative peaceful village living. No electricity, no modern conveniences... no modern man made inventions, life expectancy short...

Best of patriarchy: you go to the moon.

Seriously, you shouldn't hold this dieing sub culture on a pedestal. It's nothing to be proud of.?

It reminds me of chimpanzees and bonobos. Chimps are patriarchal, larger, more intelligent, and live longer than bonobos. While bonobos are a hair away from extinction. The only reason bonobos and their matriarchal ways have ever even existed is because there is a river separating the two. If a chimp troop ever made contact with a bonobo troop it would be a slaughter. Even without violence, the bonobos wouldnt be able to compete with the chimps. Matriarchy.?




Dragon, YouTube 5 Comments [7/18/2018 3:02:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 138940

Virginity age meter for male and femoid

Male:
Virgin under 11: Fine. If you're not virgin here it's because your village priest raped you.
Virgin between 11-13: Unless you're giga Chad it's normal
Virgin between 13-16: It's not over yet, even most normies are virgin at this age but if you haven't even kissed you should worry.
Virgin between 16-18: You're getting late, average males lose their virginity at this ages
Virgin between 18-21: Pretty much over
Virgin older than 21: OVER FOREVER

Femoid:
Virgin under than 11: Fine. If you're not virgin here it's because your uncle raped you
Virgin between 11-13: Mostly Stacys and ghetto bitches lose their virginity at this age
Virgin between 13-15: Average femoid loses their virginity at this age so you're late
Virgin between 16-18: You're ugly or have 0 social skills but don't worry some desperate dude will fuck you
Virgin older than 18: Error 404 not found

thespanishcel, incels.me 7 Comments [7/17/2018 3:48:38 PM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138938

Incels as a solution to the Drake Equation

Most of you have probably been exposed to the concept that is the Drake Equation. All of the variables that contribute to the probability of the number of intelligent civilizations in the Universe capable of radio transmission, etc. etc. From this has been been generalized the notion of the Great Filter to account for the seemingly non-existence of detectable alien life forms. What if incels are this Great Filter? In every life form on Earth that reproduces sexually, there tends to be a power imbalance between the sexes, favoring one or the other as selected for by the environment and evolution over great time periods. In humanity, this phenomena waxes and wanes over much shorter time periods with the changing conditions of our civilizations, accelerated by the plasticity of language, culture and other higher-order emergent social structures. During the early stages of civilization, life is difficult and this favors the traits of men. As men build civilization and develop or rediscover technology, life becomes easier and ultimately leads to women being given the advantage.

What if every late-stage alien civilization that procreates through sexual reproduction and has advanced to the point of early space travel snuffs itself out due to neglecting the needs of its incels, who either effectively pull out the rungs holding up civilization causing an immediate collapse and/or are persecuted to the point of being rounded up and killed, resulting in a civilizational plateau and slow dysgenic decline (as civilization is geared entirely to the short term needs and desires of the female sex and ugly & dumb 5/10s ride imprisoned Chad's cock) from which there is no recovery? We see localized evidence of this in our own history, such as the Bronze Age Collapse and the Mycenians, for example.

I'm not sure what can be done about this. I don't think we can escape this trap politically, at least here in the West. We can do it technologically through AI/robot companions, eugenics, genetic engineering, but here we see feminists encroaching on this field through political means of control.

What options do we have? What strategies can we adopt

mviper, incels.me 5 Comments [7/17/2018 3:46:59 PM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138937

Why do people reject the blackpill, and when will they accept it?

People want to fuck beautiful people. Even ugly people want to fuck beautiful people. Everyone seems to accept this part.

What the mainstream cannot accept is that women only want to fuck beautiful people, and that women would rather go without sex than to fuck someone ugly. They only accept ugly guys for money and security. This, to me, is obvious. I figured out all of this before I heard of the blackpill.

Is this some catastrophic idea? It's plainly evident that some people have all the money, while others have none; it shouldn't be anymore hard to accept that the same disparity is also true of sex-partners.

Maybe women lie to themselves so well about their nature, that they can convince men of that lie too (the soul-mate idea). Maybe this type of all-or-nothing sex distribution has not been this intense in western society for a long time, and people are slow to catch on to the paradigm shift. Maybe people feel uncomfortable equating sex with money.

When do you think the blackpill will be accepted by the mainstream?

The End, incels.me 3 Comments [7/17/2018 3:46:27 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138946

Women aren't meant to be educated.

They don't do anything with the information anyway. Their only passion is power and prominence. Teaching women how to read/ write/ etc. is like teaching a priest science. They may use it on their day to day, but they won't really use their learnings as a launchpad for anything valuable. They'll just twist it to their designs, and tune out what isn't in their sphere of agenda.

They don't have any attention span for information (for broad knowing's sake) to even be told anything esoterical about their own primality/ dark nature. So you really can't do shit.Knowledge can't fix anything.

Eugeniker, Sluthate 6 Comments [7/17/2018 8:43:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 138944

MGTOWs are destroying the roasties and cuck on /pol/
I noticed on /pol/ recently (at 4chan not 8chan), there are more and more guys who are going MGTOW and are even blacpilled incels who are going their own way (like me). Great news, since /pol/ is very influence, far more so than pretty much any subreddit and far more than Sluthate or any other incel site.

With luck the number of blackpilled men who are incel or MGTOW and know the truth about women will accelerate, as social media has allowed women to show their true nature and completely destroyed blupilled ideology that women want nice, caring guys. And completely destroyed cuckservative ideology that guys should just get married and start a family with some thot who can accuse you of rape with no proof and get you sent to prison for years, or fuck outside the marriage, get knocked up and then ask the husband to pay child support for a kid that isn't even his for 18 years.

Soon these feminist and cuckservative pussy worshipping SIMPS will run out of bluepilled cucks to exploit. Soon being MGTOW or incel will be a point of PRIDE (it already is for me) rather than targets of derision and degradation as they are for so much of modern, liberal, feminist, western, multicultural society. LONG LIVE MGTOW!! And also blackpilled incels who are spreading the truth about bitches, you just need to swallow the final blackpill that getting married/dating women is not worth it in the long run, especially if you're an omega male who women don't like.

dsar9012, Sluthate 1 Comments [7/17/2018 8:42:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 4
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
1 2 3 4 5 6 | top