1 2 3 4 5 8 | bottom
Quote# 126754

(argument in the comments section under a RAPE SURVIVOR'S stamp; even if he's a troll, the line has been crossed...)

95% of women masturbate everyday to the idea of being raped.

[[citation needed]]

Rape fantasies in women are tied to wanting to feel dominated and controlled by a superior strength to their own. 95% of women prefer men who are taller than them.

[[I don't see how a guy being taller than me equates to him being a misogynistic control freak. Physical traits do not automatically correlate with behavioral traits...[also],You can't just as spout out statistics without proving you didn't make them up.]]

It's true though. Just ask your female friends.

[[I'm 100% female, physically and mentally. And guess what? I HATE the idea of rape (I'd prefer a romantic partner who makes me feel physically and emotionally safe, NOT dominated and scared)... and so do all my female friends. I bet your misogynistic macho-man mind is completely blown, because according to your narrow views of the female human organism, neither I or all my female friends should exist.]]

[you] don't actually care about how well the man can defend [you], that's just a bullshit excuse women came up with when asked why they only date taller men because [you are] embarrassed to admit [your] rape fantasies. A man could be weak as fuck, but a woman would still want him if he was at least stronger than her and able to fulfill her rape fantasies.

[[Where did you get that fact from? An Alt-right blog?]]

No, everyone knows it.

[[The he-man woman hater's club you belong to does not count as "everyone".]]

It's hard to like a gender that masturbates while playing rape scenes through their heads.

RetroSpriteResources , Deviantart comments section 7 Comments [4/28/2017 2:41:00 PM]
Fundie Index: 2

Quote# 126751

The problem is liberal arts courses and radical feminism.

The solution is to create a "conservative arts" curriculum that emphasizes honesty and rational thought. The inverse of a liberal arts course.

The other thing is to defund women's studies and black studies program and prohibit any federal dollars from supporting them.

It is absurd to have courses that teach women to hate men, and blacks to hate whites.

How would liberals feel if we had men's studies courses that taught men to hate and take advantage of women. Or White studies programs that reinforced aryan-nation views on white superiority?

At the very least any institution that receives federal funds and offers women's and black studies, should be required to offer men's and white studies.

CasualBystander, Alien Hub 3 Comments [4/28/2017 2:40:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 0

Quote# 126745

Anonymous, Sizzle 4 Comments [4/28/2017 2:37:53 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom

Quote# 126743

The whole medicalization of mens’ attraction to adolescent girls is just a joke. Take a look at what sells the most in the sex industries: TEENAGE GIRLS. SCHOOLGIRLS. LOLITAS. JAILBAIT.

Sexual preferences for adolescent girls are clearly the norm for men not sexual disorders or so called “paraphilias”

Roger Plumrose, Human Stupidity: Irrationality, Self Deception 2 Comments [4/28/2017 2:37:24 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 126624

Imagine if men didn’t have the gall to speak at a women’s march

imagine-men, Tumblr 1 Comments [4/28/2017 2:05:13 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 126399

The demise of western culture, at the hands of the Jews and their goyim lackeys, could never have been achieved were it not for the abandonment by women of their men and their cultures. They achieved this by waging wars to kill the male workforce, thus bringing in the women and giving them the vote. And then bringing them into the workforce. The bankers put the mortgages and house prices up next. This then put pressure on the family. Both husband and wife were now forced to go out to work to make ends meet. Both sexes lost out.

It’s a sad thing to say, but it has to be said: without feminist power, which increased the power of the state to promote many women into positions they were unfit to hold, the West would not be the shit hole it is today.

Women see immigrants as more cock to please them with. The overwhelming majority of women have no loyalty to indigenous culture and tradition. The woman will simply see all men as merely a stop gap until something better comes along. It is just like the animal kingdom with the pride of lionesses. They will stay with the male until his power is usurped and when it is, they’ll stay with the new one when he overpowers the old. There is very little loyalty from western woman to her male and culture. And it’s even more so today, with these groups of fat, sugar plum feminists. Watch them roam the streets in their stupid platform shoes, looking like they’ve just stepped off a porn set. Yuck! See them hunting for a man to pick up for a wham-bam evening. Or for a woman.

They’re not too fussy what sex they pick up, and they’re always making snide comments about heterosexuality and how it just isn’t normal.

Truly, it’s a sad sight to see.

Lasha Darkmoon, Darkmoon 6 Comments [4/28/2017 1:52:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: Citizen Justin

Quote# 126392

[Note: due to the censored name I can't find the original source, the link leads to a tumblr post mocking him. Still I felt like this is SSTDT worthy. Enjoy.]

James ???, Facebook 3 Comments [4/28/2017 1:50:48 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew

Quote# 126350

Your children being ugly is a valid argument to be completely honest.
If I were to marry an ugly girl who drastically improved her features through cosmetic surgery it would be like shitting all over my genetic bloodline. If it becomes commonplace it would assist in allowing people with inferior genes to multiply aka shoot higher than they are worth. If your face is a 3 then you should compensate with other things. Just think about the implications of plastic surgery in that dynamic. A 6 can upgrade themselves to a 7.5 paying just a little money while having done nothing to improve themselves as people while still carrying the genes of a 6.

Also there is even scientific proof that genes do in fact contribute to personality traits. I'm afraid I wouldn't want my son to have an insecure, shallow, beta loser personality either. I think plastic acceptance nonsense is one of the dumbest liberal asshat jokes of this generation. Why are you trying to combat the shame of fakeness by trying to alter public opinion on the subject? Because it doesn't fit into your own personal paradigm that's why.

These are the kinds of thoughts that enter my mind when considering whether to date a fake plastic woman. And don't get me started on the plastic men who walk around looking like clowns with shiny bbcream on their faces. They make me chuckle. I don't even consider them human.

sr982, Reddit 5 Comments [4/28/2017 1:47:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 1

Quote# 126291

List of people I hate:

1.My parents for giving me shitty genes

2.Myself for believing I had good genes and for attempting to seduce a girl out of my league

3.Every Greek male who is above me in looks and height

thegamblER, /r/incels 12 Comments [4/28/2017 1:46:26 PM]
Fundie Index: 1
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep

Quote# 126734

Bally dancers and nakedness are synonymous. It's the dirtiest, most lustful and immodest sport in the world. Women dance with their private area flashing in everyone's face, while she skates like a whore on the ice, exposing her crotch for all the world to see. Most bally dancing is sexually promiscuous on purpose to seduce the audience. It's evil in the sight of God. I spoke with one young lady and asked her what she wanted to be? She said a movie producer in Hollywood. This is the pathetic hope of America!

David J. Stewart, Jesus Is Savior 14 Comments [4/27/2017 10:48:03 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: P.E.T.F

Quote# 126726

Fathers are our society's true heroes, yet the liberals belittle men and portray fathers in television programs and commercials as being stupid, incompetent and destructive (e.g., Family Guy and The Simpsons). Fathers don't receive enough due praise from their wives, children or from society itself. Children often raise their voice at fathers in primetime TV programs. Children are seen sassing dad, calling him an idiot, slamming the door in his face while he is talking. During this blatant disrespect for fathers and husbands, the sound of an audience laughing is heard in the background. Television viewers hear people laughing while a father has a door slammed in his face, or is rebuked by a little sarcastic brat. If this happened in real life, a good parent would take off their belt and lovingly beat some fear into that child. I'm not talking about child abuse. I don't approve of any kind of abuse. I believe God put that padded area in the back of every human being for a reason, and that reason is for spankings! Proper spankings never hurt any child!!!

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 12 Comments [4/27/2017 10:46:03 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126724

You are obviously making up bullshit in order to attack evolutionary psychology. It is not credible that a boy would want to kill himself simply because he was touched by his mother. Women cannot commit sexual abuse per se, but they can of course commit emotional and physical abuse, which is at least as bad:


"Children who are emotionally abused and neglected face similar and sometimes worse mental health problems as children who are physically or sexually abused, yet psychological abuse is rarely addressed in prevention programs or in treating victims, according to a new study published by the American Psychological Association."

It is even indubitable that some of the emotional and physical abuse that women commit is sexual in nature, but that does not mean the category of sexual abuse committed by women deserves to be taken seriously, because that would presuppose harm due to the sexual aspect itself, independent of the emotional and physical aspects, which is what evolutionary psychology denies. There are no such adaptations -- no theoretical reason for them and none observed empirically. Indeed, the evidence suggests that even with regard to prepubescent girls, "sexual abuse" is largely a projection created by adults, with no basis in factual harm above and beyond emotional and physical abuse.

The sex-abuse adaptations that do exist are women's rape-avoidance adaptations, and they kick in at puberty. Females of reproductive age can indeed be traumatized by the sexual aspect of rape far beyond what the violence involved would otherwise suggest. Ironically, feminists deny that these adaptations exist, and instead confabulate about this specious concept of gender-neutrally applicable "sexual abuse" that in your twisted imagination is more harmful to children than adult women even though the evidence suggests exactly the opposite and excludes female perpetrators.

Eivind Berge, EIVIND BERGE'S BLOG 5 Comments [4/27/2017 10:38:51 PM]
Fundie Index: 5
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 126718

biblical women like Sarah, Zipporah, Elizabeth, Mary etc most certainly resembled Muslim women in modest clothing

I see women in my church who dress like atheist women. tight jeans revealing the shape of their behinds, tight tops with low necklines, skirts that end above the knee

adultery and formication begins with the eye. and a skimplily dressed woman endangers men by facilitating them in sin.

Anonymous Coward, Godlike Productions 15 Comments [4/27/2017 10:34:34 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126716

My wife is NOT a feminist! She is a Christ-honoring woman and submits to my authority. My wife hates feminism because she knows it goes AGAINST God and His Word. We've been married now for 17 years. She likes to make the feminists mad when we're in the store. She'll ask me in front of feminist women if she can buy something. You can see the dirty looks on their faces. My wife likes to say, "wait, I need to go ask my husband" or "He pays the bills, ask him." It drives the feminists nuts when a wife submits to her husband. I really admire my wife's loyalty and obedience to the Word of God and me. She's my best friend.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 12 Comments [4/27/2017 10:30:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126691

Guy characters in videogames get beautified compared to the average joe too, not to mention guys are stronger than most girls because its a part of a males DNA. So obviously most badass protagonists that use some decent amounts of strength are gonna be dudes. Heck, if we did have female protagonists doing these things they would say its fanservice. Some of these people need to just settle down a little. (even though I am a peeved that people still complain about this stuff)

Bennagio, Heavy 20 Comments [4/26/2017 1:00:05 PM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126682

You know that Germany just recently (I believe it was yesterday) has pass a criminal NAZI law that ban any marriage under the age of 18? literally you are unabled to marry a 17-year-old is the last insult of that aberration called Federal Germany literally leaded by an old hag and a parliament of manginas.

A country of weak and feminist democrats where you could already be imprisoned for having relationships with 15-years-old if they (some femihag judges) are considered her “immature”, 40 years ago if you said that a girl of 15 was a “child” would have laughed in your face. While the real perverts (you know what I mean) walk unpunished.

As long as man is submissive to women and to the feminist-modernist-democratic system, the decent and good men, can expect nothing of this life, neither in the social or sexual ladder. Nor the young girls can expect anything valuable in their best years of life.

Willhem, Resisting the coming 21st century holocaust – Men's Rights, Youth Rights, Sexual Rights 11 Comments [4/26/2017 12:44:12 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Xavier Hugo

Quote# 126680

It is a horrible sin for a woman to reveal her nakedness in public by wearing a bikini. Many women dress in bikinis and then are paranoid that a lustful man may lust upon them. Some men get jealous and angry when other men look upon their wives, and rightfully so; but if those women would stop sinning and put some clothes on their nakedness, there would be nothing to lust upon. Lust requires an immodestly dressed woman to complete. A lustful man ought to have to guess and image what a woman's body looks like, but if you take your clothes off, then he doesn't have to imagine anything, because your nakedness is seen by him.

You are just as guilty of adultery as he is because you encouraged the sin of lust by your whorish attire (Matthew 5:28). Prostitutes wear more clothing than girls and women at the beach do in skimpy bikinis. Mamas are so stupid when they let their little girls run around in their underwear. Then those mothers freak out when a pedophile kidnaps and molests their child. What do you expect? You never know what is going on in a person's mind.

David J. Stewart, Jesus is Savior 11 Comments [4/26/2017 12:41:42 PM]
Fundie Index: 7

Quote# 126675

In 2008, writing under the username FredFredrickson, Fisher posited that the notion that “rape is bad” was not an absolute truth. He wrote, “I’m going to say it—Rape isn’t an absolute bad, because the rapist I think probably likes it a lot. I think he’d say it’s quite good, really.”

Though he stated he “doesn’t advocate breaking the law,” Fisher said online in 2012 that a 40-year-old man asking to see the breasts of a 15-year-old wasn’t creepy. Instead, he said it was “evolutionarily advantageous and perfectly natural.”

As a candidate for state representative, Fisher proposed bringing concerns about the supposed plague of false rape accusations into the statehouse. Hosting a forum on Reddit under the username RobertFisherforNH, Fisher sought ideas to prevent “innocent people [from] receiving jail time.” He argued that because in rape cases “police err on the side of caution,” and show a high level of support for victims, the system was “susceptible to abuse” by women.

Robert Fisher, State Representative NH 9th district, We Hunted The mammoth 13 Comments [4/26/2017 12:13:55 AM]
Fundie Index: 13
Submitted By: skybison

Quote# 126673

Last November, voters in New Hampshire’s Lakes Region re-elected to the state house of representatives a man who appears to be one of the secret architects of the internet’s misogynistic “Manosphere.”

The homegrown son of a preacher, 31-year-old Robert Fisher is a Republican who represents New Hampshire’s Belknap County District 9. In addition to his legislative duties, Fisher owns a local computer-repair franchise, and in his spare time, seems to have created the web’s most popular online destination for pickup artistry and men’s rights activists, The Red Pill, according an investigation by the Daily Beast.

An investigation into Fisher’s online aliases found a trail of posts linking the lawmaker to the username Pk_atheist, the creator of The Red Pill—an online Reddit community of nearly 200,000 subscribers that promotes itself as a “discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.”
A post by Pk_atheist in the early days of the forum advertises the author’s blog, Dating American, a blog that immediately precipitated the establishment of The Red Pill in 2012 and which was “dedicated to the woes of dating in the American culture.” On the “about the author” section of Dating American, the author, who calls himself “Desmond,” promotes two other blogs he’s “authored”: Existential Vortex and Explain God. Performing a search of the unique URL for Existential Vortex led to a comment on an ex-Christian message board again advertising the blog, existentialvortex.blogspot.com. This post, written under the alias “Interested,” provided the keystone that connected Pk_atheist and Robert Fisher. First, the post revealed the user was the author of Existential Vortex (and thus, Dating American). Second, in the user’s bio, he stated his band—The Five Nines—had a new album out. Robert Fisher is the sole member of his band, The Five Nines.

Rep. Robert Fisher, Daily Beast 7 Comments [4/26/2017 12:12:59 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126669

Over the weekend, Alex Jones posted a video on his Infowars website in which he claimed that, by his “conservative” estimate, he already “had over 150 women” by the time he turned 16.

Jones was laying out his theory that most people today are nothing more than children until they reach the age of 40 … unlike himself, who achieved full manhood by the time he was 16 years old.

“You’re supposed to have children in every culture, biologically, by 16,” Jones claimed. “If you’re not having them by 16, there’s something wrong with you. Oh, but see, there’s college—the priesthood you’ve got to get into—and then by then, oh, you’ve got to make money because you’re in debt, oh, you don’t have time for kids.”

“Oh, you’re 40, you’re finally halfway out of debt, oh, you want to have some fun now, oh, you try to find a woman,” he continued. “Oh, she’s barren, she’s doing the same thing. By the time you figure out you want to live, by the time you hit 16 at 40—I’m giving you the big knowledge folks—at 40, on average—and they do this by design—you are the equivalent of a 16-year-old.”

But not Jones.

“When I was 16, I didn’t want to party any more, I didn’t want to play games any more. I grew up,” he said. “I’d already been in the fights, all the big rituals. I’d already had, probably—I hate to brag, I’m not bragging, it’s actually shameful—probably 150 women or more, that’s conservative. I’d had over 150 women, I’d already been in fights with full-grown men, I was already dating college girls by the time I was 15-years-old. I was already a man at 16.”

Alex Jones, Right Wing Watch 24 Comments [4/25/2017 2:28:57 PM]
Fundie Index: 5

Quote# 126664

Conservative commentator Michael Reagan, the son of former president Ronald Reagan, defended Bill O’Reilly this morning over claims that the recently fired Fox News host sexually harassed women.

Reagan, a contributor to the conservative outlet Newsmax, shared posts on Facebook and Twitter insisting that if women wear “low cut dresses,” then men should consider suing “for sexual arousal”:

"If women are going to wear low cut dresses that show cleavage don’t be harassed when we men look.Or shld we sue for sexual arousal?"
— Michael Reagan (@ReaganWorld) April 21, 2017

He also responded to the allegation that O’Reilly called a black coworker “hot chocolate” and grunted while passing her desk by saying that it was a compliment:

"Hot Choclare used to be a compliment on your looks today it is called sexual harassment..@oreillyfactor"
— Michael Reagan (@ReaganWorld) April 21, 2017

Michael Reagan, Right Wing Watch 13 Comments [4/25/2017 11:51:40 AM]
Fundie Index: 9

Quote# 126626

I just want my daughter to marry a healthy guy with a good work ethic and a kind heart. Preferably good looking and athletic, too. I’m not so sure she’d find that at MIT or Caltech. Or the Ivies, for that matter. I want vigorous, bouncing grandkids someday, but I shudder at the thought of what she might bring back from those places.

No, I’d rather she spends time with earnest white jocks who like hunting, hiking and fishing in their spare time.

My sons, on the other hand, can go in for all the nerdy pursuits they want. In their case at least I can influence them in a manly direction.

Bill P, Unz 17 Comments [4/25/2017 4:33:13 AM]
Fundie Index: 4

Quote# 126600

For the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class), the neo-con propaganda outlet FOX News has, for the past 20 years or so, served the important purpose of keeping conservatives on a leash long enough to allow to them vent off their frustration, yet just short enough to keep them from wandering off into the land of total truth. The sole saving grace of the network was that, in allowing just enough cosmetic "conservatism" to air before millions of viewers, a percentage of the more astute elements of the massive audience would eventually wander off the plantation completely and join the ranks of the full truth "conspiracy theorists" TM. Indeed, during the late 1990's, your now fully enlightened Editor here passed through the FAUX News / Rush Limbaugh halfway-house before growing out of the "Left-Right" control cage altogether.

For that reason, in spite of our disdain for Rupert Murdoch's FAUX, we are nonetheless troubled by the recent and much-publicized rise of his de-balled sons (Lachlin & James) and their stupid and controlling communist wives (Sarah & Kathyrn). The scuttlebutt is that the contemptible, yet immensely popular, Bill O'Reilly was forced out by these beautiful women. O'Reilly's coveted 8 PM slot will be filled by Tucker Carlson, whose first guest as the new 8-PMer under the reign of the Bolshevik Bitches will be a man that O'Reilly once mocked -- the freakish trannie, Bruce Jenner (now referred to as "Caitlyn").

1. Kathryn made no effort to hide her love for Hillary and red-hot hatred for Trump & Bannon (She likes Ivanka though!)

2. Kathryn's "kinder, gentler" FOX will feature the degenerate freak Bruce Jenner.

Expect some of O'Reilly's elderly following to have heart attacks when Jenner appears with Carlson this coming Monday (April 24th)! But don't blame Carlson (who is actually not that bad) for having such a vile Satanic creature on his program. You can be sure that the Murdoch women, Kathryn in particular, are behind this obscenity. The Sisters-in-Law Murdoch had already previously amended the company's benefits package to include "expanded coverage for our transgender colleagues.”

Both Kathryn and Sarah are known to be "progressives." Of the two, Katryn (much like another silly little rich girl, Ivanka Trump) wields more power in her own right. She is a real fanatic when it comes to Trump-bashing, homosexuality, trannies and the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax. Since the Murdochs swallowed up National Geographic in 2015, that psuedo-scientific rag has continued to aggressively push the hoax while not allowing any real scientists to rebut the "settled science." The "philanthropist" Kathryn also worked for both the Clinton Climate Initiative and the Environmental Defense Fund. (here)

Old man Rupert once dismissed the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax as "alarmist nonsense." We expect this attitude at FOX News to "evolve" and eventually align with the views of the young Murdochs' National Geographic and Kathryn's beloved Environmental Defense Fund.

Now if you thought those National Geographic covers were bad, get a load of the EVIL boy-trannie child-abuse abomination that the next generation of the House of Murdoch recently put out. It's enough to almost make us want to plead with wretched old man Rupert Murdoch and that arrogant ass-clown Bill O'Reilly -- "Please, stay!"

Childhood psycho-sexual abuse --- coming soon to FOX's conservative audience.

The modern trend of men allowing their deranged women to rule over them is yet another symptom of the decay and decline of Western Civilization. Another high profile example of this alarming phenomenon is baby girl's Ivanka Trump-Kushner's uncontrolled White House antics -- such as her uninformed public support for the Global Warming TM / Climate Change TM hoax, "women's workplace issues," and her meeting with the baby butchers and baby body-part dealers of Planned Parenthood. Neither "The Donald" nor Ivanka's typically P-whipped Jewish husband, Jared Kushner, could reign in this spoiled little brat even if they wanted to.

And speaking of P-whipped, does it get any more pathetic than Pro Football Super Star and Trumpstein supporter, Tom Brady, failing to show up at the White House ceremony to honor the New England Patriots Super Bowl victory? You see, boys and girls, Brady's super-model wife, Giselle Bundchen, is an outspoken pro-abortionist, an anti-Trump tweeter, and a "Climate Change" TM libtard who is evidently embarrassed and fed-up with her husband's support for Trumpstein. We'll bet you dimes to doughnuts that the lovely Giselle put her high-heeled foot down and threatened to close down the candy store until pretty Tommy put an end to his public support for Trumpstein.

Your old-school Editor here at The Anti-New York Times has the utmost gentlemanly respect for the ladies. That respect does not extend to any "man" who allows a woman, no matter how blonde and beautiful, to de-ball and dictate to him. Unless and until men rediscover their balls and tell the Ivanka Trumps, the Giselle Bundchens, the Kathryn Murdochs and the Sarah Murdochs of our diseased and decaying society: "Shut up and sit down, you silly woman!" -- there will be no hope for the recovery of our collective sanity. Then again, in fairness to such men and in consideration of what our Marxist courts allow these wayward women to inflict upon husbands and fathers, many bullied men have no choice but to meekly accept the mischief of their wives -- or face alienation from their children.

Sick upside-down world!

Proverbs 21:19: Better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and angry woman.

Boobus Americanus 1: I read in the New York Times that the Murdoch sons and their wives are much more liberal than the old man.

Boobus Americanus 2: It would be nice if they overhaul FOX News and make it more objective. As it stands now, I can't stomach it.

Sugar: Hey Boobusss! Ya think your panssie-ass could stomach a ssubscription to the Anti-New York Times?

Editor: If Boobus can't even handle the watered-down half-truths of FAUX News, then he'd surely puke his guts up over the true stuff we put out.

Mike King, Tomato Bubble 5 Comments [4/23/2017 12:22:04 PM]
Fundie Index: 3

Quote# 126596

Won't get too many Amens here.

Michael Jordan, Facebook 16 Comments [4/23/2017 12:20:40 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: Ivurm

Quote# 126595

WOMAN: The female human. For many generations has been inferior to its male counterparts. However, there is a reason for this. Men have been proven to physically, emotionally and intellectually outperform women. Want proof? Well the vast majority of the history's great artists, musician, athletes, inventors and intellectuals have been men.

canadiancon, Urban Dictionary 32 Comments [4/23/2017 12:20:35 PM]
Fundie Index: 6
1 2 3 4 5 8 | top