Quote# 824

Nuclear weapons, like all weapons, are morally neutral. The person employing them chooses to do either good or evil with them.
Using the example that you cited in which a western city is destroyed (and countless innocent lives lost)-that would be evil.
However, let's say that a western city has already been attacked and thousands of people killed by Islamic extremists flying aircraft into buildings. Under those circumstances, vaporizing each and every nation that was involved would be good! VERY GOOD!!!

Gibor, Theology Forums 24 Comments [10/1/2002 12:00:00 AM]
Fundie Index: 11

Username  (Login)
Comment  (Text formatting help) 

1 | bottom

Tommy9898

What ever happend to turning the other cheek?

10/5/2006 2:21:58 AM

Crosis

So you propose wiping out millions, if not a billion, innocent lives to get the terrorists?

That's it. YOU! Out of the gene pool!

10/5/2006 4:51:09 AM

Denizen

NO, a good use for using nukes would be one where we use it to destroy an incoming asteriod, you prick.

10/5/2006 6:03:23 AM

Julian

Yes, and given there were no nations involved why don't you STFU dickwad!

10/5/2006 6:08:16 AM

Adrian

Bastard.

12/30/2006 5:57:16 PM

SaneChick

Fuck the island, we need to vote Gibor off the planet.

12/30/2006 6:53:48 PM

Zakko

And these guys claim that atheists lack the sense of morals and ethics.

4/18/2007 11:24:48 AM

Hawker Hurricane

BUT... what if it turned out your own nation was involved because it was looking for an excuse to go to war with another? Would it be moral to vaporize yourself then?

4/18/2007 11:56:30 AM

Grungust

Oh yes, the murder of countless innocents is definitely the True Christian choice.

4/18/2007 12:10:41 PM

anti-nonsense

What about the innocent people in THOSE nations?

You are an asshole. Please walk into the path of an oncoming truck.

4/19/2007 2:21:10 AM

Puck

Apocalypse award?

Go back into the garden, Gibor, and find yourself some bugs to eat.

4/19/2007 2:25:15 AM

That_Guy

Killing white people = evil
Killing brown people = good

Got it. Thanks.

2/13/2009 4:18:46 PM

rw23

So what should happen if a bunch of CIA extremists topple a democratically-elected South American government or sell weapons to a foreign enemy nation so as to raise cash for a bunch of right-wing anti-democratic revolutionaries?

Langley*, you're radioactive glass.

* I couldn't bring myself to follow Gibor's example and advocate the nuking of all American cities.

2/13/2009 8:16:02 PM

Mr. Creazil

Definitely a Raping the Dog quote.

2/14/2009 4:34:31 AM

Canadiest

Religion must end or we're fucking doomed

2/14/2009 5:21:11 PM

Darwin

Nuclear weapons, like all weapons, are morally neutral. The person employing them chooses to do either good or evil with them.

So far, so good.

Then you fucked it all up.

2/14/2009 6:11:53 PM



<Enters typical Dalek speech in response to this pile of shit.>

3/2/2011 5:23:32 AM

Anon2

So, "Gibor", you then advocate that after the Oklahoma City Bombings, it would have been VERY GOOD to vaporize all US states involved with the domestic terrorists using nuclear weapons?

Timothy McVeigh was born in New York -> Goodbye New York!
He received his military training in Georgia -> Glass parking space Georgia!
He and the other conspirators tested and build their bombs in Kansas -> There goes Kansas ...

3/2/2011 5:34:39 AM

whatever

Mohammed Atta was from Saudi Arabia. So was Osama Bin Laden. If you vapourised Saudia Arabia, millions of people who are already suffering under an oppressive regime would be killed, by a country that should be helping them.

Also there wouldn't be any oil... it would all go up in a massive fireball and black out the atmosphere with smoke (worldwide), possibly doubling the atmospheric CO2 level.

Thirdly, due to the destruction of Islam's holy nation and holiest sites, every radicalised muslim would be obliged to avenge. And millions more muslims worldwide would radicalise in response. Iran would increase it's Uranium enrichment program, with one very obvious goal in mind. North Korea would see the USA weakened.

And that is just for starters.

3/2/2011 6:06:24 AM

Swede

So that's why you are bombing Saudi Arabia into oblivion! Oh wait...

Let's say that an Arab city has already been attacked and thousands of people killed by American soldiers dropping bombs. Under those circumstances, vaporizing each and every nation that was involved would be good! VERY GOOD! Or, ya know, not. It never ends, see, because then those nations want to retaliate, and the countries that are harmed in that wave is going to retaliate in their turn.

3/2/2011 6:41:33 AM

rubber chicken

An eye for an eye makes everyone blind

3/2/2011 7:19:03 AM

Dr. Shrinker

"Nuclear weapons, like all weapons, are morally neutral. The person employing them chooses to do either good or evil with them."

This message has been brought to you by the National Nukes Association. WE'RE THE NNA

3/2/2011 7:22:20 AM

Anon-e-moose

"Nuclear weapons, like all weapons, are morally neutral. The person employing them chooses to do either good or evil with them.
Using the example that you cited in which a western city is destroyed (and countless innocent lives lost)-that would be evil.
However, let's say that a western city has already been attacked and thousands of people killed by Islamic extremists flying aircraft into buildings. Under those circumstances, vaporizing each and every nation that was involved would be good! VERY GOOD!!!"

So why are you and your ilk so opposed to Iran's own nuclear ambitions, again...?!

Not for nothing was Obama awarded the Nobel Peace Prize. Mainly for preventing Sarah Failin getting her moose-guts-slick claws on The Button. She believes in the (C)Rapture. You do the maths.

3/2/2011 9:06:44 AM

Quantum Mechanic

Gibor, you are a piece of shit.

6/24/2011 6:32:18 PM

1 | top: comments page