Quote# 126957

Lower the Age of Consent to 11 !

- 11 is usually the age humans start being able to reproduce
- To help avoid criminalizing sex between two high school pupils

It is obvious that the age of consent is much too high in most of the world, The reasoning behind placing the age of consent at 16 is deeply flawed. After all who is likely to give a young person a good time? Someone well experienced or some fumbling kid? I think i know what I would prefer if i were a kid again.
If Spain can place the age of consent at 13, then why cant the rest of the world do the right thing and place it at 11

lolitalover, debate.org 17 Comments [5/7/2017 7:30:14 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
Submitted By: Menomaru
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 118911

Yawn. Just more idiocy.

So you admit you shouldn't have said those things, but they were, even though you yourself admit were wrong and dumb as fuck, supposed to "shake me up"? Hahahah oh wow.

And, no, once again, if your "opinion" is something that has nothing to do with anything I ever stated, then it's not an opinion. It really isn't that hard. I mean, it is to you since you're mentally retarded. but it shouldn't be to anybody with an IQ above 20.

>So why cant others so the same, even if its directed at you?

BECAUSE MY OPINIONS DON'T BREAK THE RULES. YOURS DO, AS THEY'RE ABOUT ATTACKING ME WITH INCORRECT CLAIMS ABOUT SHIT I MOSTLY EXPLAINED BY 2013, YOU TOOL.

>if someone says they dont think your very smart based on what you say, you can disagree but accept its their opinion.

Not why you were banned, you lunatic. Keep playing the victim.

>but I think someone should have sat down with you when you were much much younger and taught you a bit about women and relationships

**HAHAHAHA MY PARENTS, WHO DIDN'T GROW UP IN A FEMINIST SOCIETY, WERE SUPPOSED TO TEACH A 12 YEAR-OLD ME TO SHOOT A GIRL OF THE SAME AGE IN THE HEAD- HAHAHAHAHA**

>but its like you turned your sub into your own safe space.

I have protected it from insane monsters like you and will continue doing so. This is by no means a safe space, as people are disagreeing with us every day. It's just not allowing crazy fucks like you in.

>your mind on women or racism I think it would make you a lot happier.

Of course. Being as delusional and stupid as you would make me somewhat happier. So would heroin. The same deal. You're selling snake oil, pal. Dangerous, cancerous snake oil.

And see how he uses the term "racism", and that's wrong, while supporting blacks killing everybody white in the world oh wow.

And, once again, go fuck yourself.

caamib, r/worstof 23 Comments [5/13/2016 3:18:12 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126811

Christ did not come as a woman
the apostels were all male.
and if we heed pual he makes it very clear.
while a woman can teach , its other women she can teach.
but she cannot teach or ursurp authority over the man.
church leadership is AUTHORITY.
and I know women who follow this to the T.
they don't follow feminism..........they FOLLOW CHRIST.

frienden thalord, Christian Forums 8 Comments [5/2/2017 11:16:25 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125831

My wife mostly does what I tell her but sometimes she gets scared of sex with me. I'll admit I can be rough and I have kinks I'm into. But when I'm horny, I don't have time for her to say no

So I enforce the fact that in marriage, there is no saying no when it comes to sex. There is no rape. I reminded her of this very thing last night when she tried to tell me no. The sooner she understands, the faster she'll so crying and accept my cock up her ass, her pussy, her mouth, in her fucking ear. Whatever mood that strikes me.

Women need to learn their place in a man's world.

Anonymous, Raw Confessions 14 Comments [4/7/2017 7:11:24 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
Submitted By: Demon Duck of Doom
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 96191

Any honest woman who has been out in the field for a few years, would admit after a couple cocktails that she'd prefer be to be a traditional domestic servant cleaning the house and blowing her husband if he was an in shape,high status, alpha stud, pulling in big dollars and running everything else. The real problem is that equality is a lot of fucking work - turns out they don't like lifting heavy shit and working long hours - who would have thought? You can't have it both ways. Gender roles are "chivalry" when they benefit women and "sexism" when they don't.

Cody Stark , Return Of Kings 52 Comments [8/26/2013 3:23:06 AM]
Fundie Index: 67
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126034

I wasn't triggered 3 years ago

I was at the beach with my parents and I began exploring it. I stumbled up a couple behind some rocks making out and touching each others parts. The girl was topless and she was taller than the guy.

I didn't give a shit about it because I was 18 at the time and I believed that I would get a girlfriend sooner or later. How wrong I was. I was naive and stupid to have such a silly hope. If I experienced this scene now I would beat the shit out both of them for being degenerate and indulging in sexual acts in front of me.


thegambler953, /r/incels 11 Comments [4/5/2017 12:12:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 122583

[In July, Kathryn B. H. Clancy and her co-authors Robin G. Nelson, Julienne N. Rutherford and Katie Hinde published a survey of 666 field-based scientists in the journal PLoS One and reported that 26 percent of the female scientists surveyed had been sexually assaulted during fieldwork.]

Of course, the push to encourage women in science is only going to cause more such sexual assaults to take place, which is one more reason why it is a bad idea. Science doesn't need more women, especially if more women in the field are going to help transform otherwise good male scientists into rapists and sex criminals.

Vox Day, Vox Popoli 30 Comments [11/18/2016 2:45:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 18
Submitted By: David
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 97692

Given the disposable nature of the male, it makes no sense to presume that they have the same capability of experiencing deeper emotions that the female possesses. Males shouldn’t really be capable of the same level of suffering, and it would be an inefficient allocation of resources to help them with things like rape and violence. Even in the unlikely event that they could experience deeper emotions, the allocation of resources to protect “innocent” males would be much more efficiently allocated helping “innocent” females, as their existence and health is more valuable to population stability. Why waste money for feel-good notions like “equality” or “justice”? These are simply subjective platitudes that apes made up in order to derive some sense of control over an indifferent and random world. They hold no objective value. Efficiency is at least quantifiable.

Unphysicalism,  Heteronormative Patriarchy for Men 24 Comments [11/17/2013 5:04:35 AM]
Fundie Index: 30
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 90508

These are things that will occur as is only possible through the creation of The New World, Post-Rebirth, as defined here.
.
.
.
-:New World Introductions:

•Global crime reduction of 95% (with a 5% exception for mentally ill individuals and femyles who have yet to be fully reformed).
•End of all war perpetually.
•Removal of all males within the guidelines of the Sufficient Genetic Standards and or Population Percentage Requirement (1-10% Globally Male).
•Removal of all femyles which are nonconvertible/unconformable (Pater-Fixation ~ incurable obsession with males ~ Mental Illness).
•Containment of all individuals with incurable disease(s) up until the time a cure for said disease(s) has been found.
•Removal of all incurably mentally-ill individuals, as defined by the Global Health Departments (GHD) standards.
•Removal of incurable femyle gender traitors and ALL male gender traitors. Regardless of the circumstances.
•Introduction of a One-World Government and a One-World Ruler (Queen), with subsidiary rulers for each nation, state, province, county, city and so forth.
•Removal of all civilian firearms due to a lack of necessity, and for public safety (avoidance of accidents).
•Universal health care with 100% coverage for all.
•Population control based on supply-and-demand for newer life. Sustainable population.
•Abolition and or destruction of all Non-Womyn (God as the Womyn) oriented religions and religious texts.

-:The Five Tenets/Doctrines of Femitheism

•The individual as well as the collective are equally important. All things must be done for the betterment of oneself and for the betterment of society as a whole. Self-improvement and all attempts to improve ones own life are seen as an act done for the greater good of all womyn.
•Each womyn is her own God, and equally the God of all others. Mutual respect among and between all womyn as well as the utmost respect for oneself is necessary for a functioning society.
•The removal of males, the incurably mentally-ill, and femyle gender traitors which cannot be reformed was, is, and forever will be a necessary function of life, bred from the desire to further produce prosperity, peace, health and general humyn enhancement.
•All laws which are set in place are for the greater good of all womyn. The intention and or nature of all of the laws which exist and or are created should not be questioned, as it is understood that these laws are the essence of justice.
•These Tenets/Doctrines must be the simple, central focus of each womyn's life. They must never be disregarded, questioned or broken.

Femitheist Divine, Femitheist Reborn 82 Comments [11/5/2012 4:53:21 AM]
Fundie Index: 102
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125860

You want Roissy ran out of town on a rail. There is a good chance he “raped” your girlfriend, and if he did not, he had her before you, or will have her after you.

But who is going to run Roissy out of town on a rail? No one has incentive to do so, or legitimate authority to do so, unless husbands and fathers have property rights in women’s sexual and domestic services.

So if you want a society where Roissy gets run out of town on a rail, or better, shot like a dog, you need a society where husbands and fathers have legitimate, socially recognized, legally recognized, and legally enforced property rights in women’s sexual and domestic services, where a husband or a father can legally and morally legitimately shoot Roissy for sniffing around where he should not, as he can shoot a burglar for sniffing around where he should not.

And if you start “protecting” unowned women from Roissy (“oh the poor things”) you are abandoning male property rights in women.

The system that Victorians liked to pretend that they had, where unowned, unprotected, and uncontrolled women were presumed to be chaste and of comparable value to owned, controlled, and protected women, is not incentive compatible. No one has strong motivation to protect the society that you piously pretend that you have. You are not upvaluing unprotected women. You are downvaluing wives and daughters.

You cannot have the supposed Victorian and the supposed Puritan system, for the same reason as the Victorians and the Puritans could not have it either. The Victorian system resulted in far too many women giving birth in the rain in dark alleys, resulting in far too many Oliver Twists, resulting in the welfare state, resulting in far too many women marrying Uncle Sam the big Pimp. And here we are.

If you start “protecting” unowned women from Roissy you are not going to succeed, because unowned women are uncontrolled women. And your entire intended system goes down the drain.

You cannot “protect” unowned women from seduction and “rape“, because women are notoriously uncooperative with anyone trying to “protect” them.

Whereupon, surprise surprise, no one runs Roissy out of town no matter how much the preacher vainly rants about chastity.

If chastity is based on male property rights in women, unowned women are outside the system and are presumed to be unchaste – and need to be outside so that they can be discriminated against and treated as of lesser value and lesser worth. Roissy screwing unowned women cannot be allowed to matter, because unowned women cannot be allowed to matter.

High estimates of the number of whores in the eighteenth and early nineteenth century where not based on the modern usage of “whore” to mean a woman rents her pussy for cash by the hour, but rather, were estimates of the number of unowned, and thus presumed to be unchaste, women. Similarly “sluts”.

You cannot keep women permanently chained to the wall. You are going to have to let them loose every now and then to take care of the baby, pick up the socks, and cook the meals. So you need to have a system that is incentive compatible with what women want. If women get entirely their way, civilization collapses, because most men will not have posterity, so will not plant trees for their grandchildren to enjoy the shade. So you need to have a system where male ownership of women is incentive compatible with what women want, where women have reason to cooperate in a system that restrains their worst excesses. So you have to downvalue unowned women and upvalue owned women. And if you downvalue unowned women, you cannot allow yourself to care about what Roissy gets up to. (Unless of course, he starts sniffing around your wife or daughter, in which case you shoot him like a dog, and the cops shrug their shoulders and say “needed killing”.)

The problem is not that women want to bang multiple high value alpha males. They want to bang only one high value alpha male, and that high value alpha male also wants them to bang only that one high value alpha male. The problem is that finding themselves of low rank the high value alpha male’s ever growing harem, they start playing off one high value alpha male against another high value alpha male in order to raise their value. The solution is to associate this tactic with being low value. And if allow ourselves to care about what Roissy gets up to, we are upvaluing women who employ this tactic. No one should care about what unowned women get up to, or about what happens to them, thus motivating unowned women to come in from the cold, and owned women to stay where it is warm.

It does not matter if the archbishop proclaims that all fertile age women are the property of their father or husband. He can, and should proclaim that all fertile age women should be the property of their father or husband, but short of keeping them all permanently chained to the dungeon wall, not all of them are going to actually be the property of their father or husband. Hence Roissy.

If we could stop unowned women from seducing Mohammed, then we could have the system that the Victorians and the Puritans pretended that they had. But we cannot.

Or if we could prevent significant numbers of women from becoming unowned, then we could have the system that the Victorians and the Puritans pretended that they had. But that would require measures that are extreme, cruel, disturbing, and, worst of all, inconvenient.

Jim, Jim's Blog 11 Comments [3/31/2017 2:13:54 AM]
Fundie Index: 8
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127440

[This is depressing, but on the other hand, real men (read: non-degenerate subscribers here) should have little to no competition today, at all.
I'm very happy that I'm married, though.]


Except you didn't used to have to fight the current to be a real man. You'd get swole and hunt and defend what was yours and make your kids play outside without anyone shitting all over it. No gender neutral parenting, no zero tolerance bullshit, no birth control residue in the water, no kids snitching on their parents for not supporting preteen analingus, and no fucking male guilt

[deleted], r/SlutJustice 2 Comments [5/23/2017 9:47:22 PM]
Fundie Index: 0
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125628

They want you to buy into the scam feminism and liberals have set up. So society can crash and be rebuilt up better the way they want it. Although a lot are just idiots who think anything goes will last forever. Neither of which will ever work out. Most dumb fuck liberals think they can just fuck the system forever and men will churn on. All it takes is for 10% of males to say "YA KNOW WHAT, FUCK THIS SHIT" and give up or seek justice.

Cunts don't give a fuck. They are too stupid to see 5 foot in front of them. Cunts are just gluttons for chad cock and beta bux. They think they can have it all forever with no consequences. They think betas and omegas will simply take this shit forever. They are very wrong.

Cunts have no concept of morality or justice or anything good at all. They are just parasitic & retarded children who will drain their host until it croaks. They are incapable of rational thought or positivity. They merely pretend to be those things just as they dress themselves up like angels with makeup and pretty clothes. Its all illusion. In reality females are demons in the flesh. Thus they deserve no rights of any kind.

The second female sexual desires matter your civilization begins to rot. It takes a while but every time it goes under. Thats why there are no matriarchies or history of females ruling a country in any way. Because the second they do they fuck it all up and bow down begging for that foreign alpha cock. Lots of suffering comes for everyone else when a nation falls. Which females don't give a fuck about. They love being conquered by other nations with brutal men and getting fucked by those men.

Female humanoid organisms are just worthless pieces of shit. They don't deserve any god damn rights. They don't deserve anything positive. Fucking pieces of shit. I could never feel sympathy for those parasitic shit lords. Females deserve to be treated lesser than shit as their inner quality exists as lower than shit.

livinginhell101, /r/incels 11 Comments [3/22/2017 7:12:05 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126382

I make life HELL for my normie roommate

Dude think he can just have bitches stay here when he's out, I get straight up and tell that bitch to leave, you can't be here unattended you don't live here ho bye bye. Then I make sure I NEVER go out when they are in so they get no alone time, I sometimes go out for 4 minutes just to trick them ahahaahaha, you'll never get any peace here normscum the ree is too strong in me. I also report them illegal tenants to the dorm building when over too much so they'll get evicted if they get another strike, aw poor normies.

AprilYi, /r/incels 13 Comments [4/16/2017 5:01:10 PM]
Fundie Index: 9
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127109

Funny seeing white twats say they are from "the 'hood." While the only hood they ever saw is their daddy's (who they badmouth all the time) Mercedes while driving them to their private school.
Western women are fucking post-garbage!

Noor Jaan Gunnar, Facebook 3 Comments [5/12/2017 1:25:01 PM]
Fundie Index: 3
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 101339

(radical feminist depiction of trans women)



Sofia, genderheritic 53 Comments [6/5/2014 3:24:28 AM]
Fundie Index: 49
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126201

The only logical thing females do is go after the best looking men

Asides form that they are irrational and instinct driven.

thegambler953, /r/incels 6 Comments [4/11/2017 9:07:49 AM]
Fundie Index: 2
Submitted By: Pharaoh Bastethotep
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 125933

Women shouldn't be allowed to vote or hold positions of power for one simple reason. Most women make decisions based on EMOTIONS instead of FACT.

As we are now seeing, a government heavily influenced by women will be overrun with bleeding heart social programs (expanding welfare state) even in the wake of much bigger problems (faltering economy).

The FACT is that we don't have the money for these social programs. However, since women have been allowed in to the political world, the EMOTIONAL response allowing these social programs has been HUGE!


unknow, Debate.org 10 Comments [4/2/2017 8:20:26 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: PETS(People Eating Tasty Sexists)
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 100709

Reminds me of Marabel Morgan's 1973 book The Total Woman. Morgan was in the social circle of the wives of Miami Dolphins football players and witnessed how a large percentage of these pampered young wives were destroying their marriages by turning into slovenly nags, so she wrote an advice book teaching her friends two things.

The first was time management. Hey girls: get your small half of the division of labor within your marriages done early, so you don't feel unhappy and bitchy about cleaning, grocery shopping, cooking etcetera on account of only getting it done at the last minute and under pressure. Get your stuff done early and you can feel great about yourselves while you go about your "me" time shoe-shopping or whatever, instead of feeling guilty about getting nothing done all day.

The second was to tell these women that in their conflicts with their husbands, THEY were the problem, not the husbands. These pampered young wives were always trying to vie for power in their relationships by doing stupid things like withholding sex because their husband hadn't taken out the trash yet. They were following female instincts to find grounds on which to see themselves as wronged, which they would then try to use as leverage. In short, these wives were not self-controlled and needed a man to control them, to not tolerate their bitchiness, but how many men are up to that without getting pissed off and alienated? These guys were stud athletes. That didn't make them extraordinary men who had any special talent for dealing with irrationally demanding women.

So Morgan tried to teach the women how to control themselves. She told them not to try to gain and use manipulative power in their marriages but do the opposite. Instead of holding back affection until they got what they wanted the wives were advised to unilaterally disarm: to give freely and generously, to stop nagging, to be hot for sex regardless of what else was going on the the relationship, and it worked.

All these wives discovered that it had indeed been them who was the problem. When they became forthcoming and generous their husbands did not grab the offered territory and demand still more. They didn't become oppressive. Instead they became MORE willing to do their part of the household division of labor. They reciprocated, and were just happy that their wives were not being bitches anymore, making them want to be with their wives more and make their wives happy.

The feminists absolutely hated it. The idea that women were the problem, not men, went against all of their ideology. But there is obviously a lot of truth to it: in very many cases women ARE the problem, and for that large fraction of cases the advice to stop being a bitch is important wisdom. Neither does it do any harm to women who aren't bitches to see someone lay out the ways in which a lot of other women ruin their marriages.

Then there are the feminists, that small minority of women who embrace self-destructive bitchiness, who don't want to be givers and don't want other women to be givers, but want all women to be as demanding and stingy as possible. That's their fight against men. They are in a constant tug of war.

Alexander Rawls, The Telegraph 30 Comments [4/28/2014 3:34:09 AM]
Fundie Index: 28
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 126990

WILMINGTON, Del. - A sixth-grade science teacher who was accused of having sex with a 13-year-old student has been sentenced to 10 years in prison. Rachel L. Holt, 35, had pleaded guilty to second-degree rape. She sobbed in court Friday as Superior Court Judge Calvin L. Scott gave her the mandatory minimum sentence.

Prosecutors had wanted Scott to sentence Holt to the maximum of 25 years.

Holt was initially charged with 28 counts of first-degree rape.

Police accused her of having sex with the boy that many times during an intense weeklong affair. She was also accused of plying the boy with alcohol and allowing him to drive her car.



I agree. Rape is rape, but this hardly stinks of the charge. 28 times in one week? Obviously he wasn't "forced" into 28 times in one week. Did she take advantage of him? Absolutely. But I agree, this does not merit ten years in jail. There are people, some on this forum, anxious and happy to throw anyone accused of anything that offends their sensibilities in the slammer for life.

Let's not become the left, friends, merely substituting our own "excuses" to lock away everyone we disagree with.

We must have laws, and they must be enforced, but society must also be served.

Guy in Bumblebee Suit, freerepublic 4 Comments [5/9/2017 8:22:43 AM]
Fundie Index: 7
WTF?! || meh

Quote# 127164

Female Personality Evolution

Despite most of them being fuckable, women have to compete too. Every woman wants to not be like other women but her ability to climb up the ranks of uniqueness depends on many factors, such as her intelligence, looks, environment, inborn personality, creativity, and more. This list is quite simplified but it helps define female evolution from its simplest forms to the most complex ones.
Goal is simple and universal to all but the last type: “To maximize number of sustainable high quality orbiters and to obtain the greatest possible appreciation and commitment level from the best available Chad.”
LEVEL 1: Basic Stacy
Life revolves around being validated on social media, make up, identifying with Beyonce's songs, and Chads cock. When eventually too old for Chad to keep on fucking, she sells herself to the highest bidder, has kids, gets fatter, dies.* Chad of Choice: Justin Bieber
*keep in mind, if attractive enough, she doesn’t have to compete with anyone below level 8. Especially in Gym Stacy version, which is Basic Stacy attending gym.
LEVEL 2: Basic Stacy Deluxe
Same exact script but with some thought put into rationalizing and romanticizing it to sound deeper than it is. For example, social media obsession is actually her networking or being artistic, and the top 40 songs she identifies with are ballads sang by crap female singers with great vocal range such as Adele, which in her social group counts as having a taste. Will finish college and have some type of career in something like education, and if she ends up purposely unemployed with kids, she'll base her decision on research. She likes Chad because of his confidence and personality and when she gets pumped and dumped she'll actually overcome an abusive relationship. Chad of Choice: Christian Grey
LEVEL 3: Good Girl
Average in every single way, and less attractive than her Stacy friends without actually being ugly, she usually went unnoticed. She appeals to men by being decent and stable, which is what many look for especially in comparison to her friends who can get sponsorships just for fucking around. Often from religious or at the very least overprotective families. She doesn’t drink, doesn’t do drugs, doesn’t sleep around, is average in school, wants to marry and be a mom, and soon enough when removed from school setting where she’s surrounded by more flashy girls, she finds men who are very happy with this offer. What these husbands to be don’t understand is that they bore her to tears, that she dreams of the same Chads who fuck her best friend she’s living vicariously through, and that the only reason she isn’t living it up is fear. She’s a ticking time bomb that will blow up and result in an especially shocking affair, divorce, and sexual exploration (drunk orgies) later in life. Chad of Choice: Her beta boyfriend’s alpha best friend or her best friend Stacy’s Chad
LEVEL 4: Basic Tomboy
Can range from attractive to ugly, this one is just smart enough to perceive than despite all the attention, men don't really value basic Stacy and her "interests", especially once in a relationship with her. Being interesting doesn’t come naturally to her due to complete lack of original thought, so instead of copying basic Stacies from her circle, she copies basic Norman/Chad in an attempt to get an edge over other girls by being more fun and in tune with the male brain. So she passionately follows sports, denounces anything fancy and girly, wears only natural looking make up, and forces herself upon a group of male friends who accept her because she lets them fuck her. The other part of her personality focuses on desperately trying to please every stereotypical male desire that stereotypical Stacy stereotypically fails at. This one is a treat for the right kind of guys since in her endless quest to prove how non difficult she is and how much she gets the male mind, she tolerates being cheated on, makes sandwiches, embraces porn, and takes it up the ass. Chad of choice: male best friend who is alpha in her pack - this one doesn’t annoy men with celebrity crushes, and they aren’t masculine enough for her anyway
LEVEL 5: Quirky fat girl
Unattractive enough when compared to 50% of Stacies around her, and not athletically or socially talented enough to be one of the guys, this one is under the impression she developed a personality. That means putting a lot of thought into standing out. Usually this is achieved through elaborate and irritating fashion choices such as wearing something from the 50ies or making a certain colored lipstick her thing. She also reads. Young adult fiction, of course. Thinks she's a bit of a geek cause she talks to her more nerdy male friends about Harry Potter and acts like she too has a crush on Emma Watson. Attempts humor a lot, think Amy Schumer. Men actually can't stand her but is a relatively easy fuck during her younger days which leads to resentment and turning to popular feminism later in life. Then she becomes a typical twox/askfemales poster explaining how women wear make up for themselves and how objectified she felt that one time when a drunk guy catcalled her although/because she knows he was actually addressing her friend. Has an office job and cats. Chad of Choice: supporting vampire character from Twilight whose fantasy gay relationships she writes fanfictions about (she knows the saga sucks but it’s her “guilty pleasure”)
LEVEL 6: Tomboy Deluxe (also known as The Gamer Girl)
Good looking and a bit smarter than the average tomboy, she doesn’t have to sell herself short to get an edge over basic Stacy. Claims to get along better with men but makes sure to look cute during. She wants her beta orbiters to really worship her and finds she can get more adoration from the romantic “nerdy” crowd. There she can also find Chads with better earning potential and more willingness to commit than when fishing among average jocks. Since she perfected the formula of mixing universally popular geeky interests (as long as they don’t require too much effort getting into) and cleavage, her ego is over the roof. This also makes her get bored of most men (never the attention though) which makes her sadistic until the right Chad comes along and makes her his bdsm bitch. Chad of Choice: The Joker
LEVEL 7: The Intellectual
Smarter than Gamer Girl, this one is actually able to read a book that isn’t young adult fiction and watch a three hour long black and white European movie where everyone smokes and feels unhappy. She gets some form of personal pleasure from it although mostly just because she knows she’s one of the rare ones who get it. Got into a decent college and will never miss the chance to mention her degrees, including during online arguments. Normally tries to get at least a few of those because being a college student is important to her identity. Is a more advanced level feminist, environmentally and politically aware, liberal, likes to think she’s cynical but is really just sarcastic when applicable. Worked hard to obtain resting bitch face and to appear as disinterested with everything as possible, including sex. Has few friends with benefits among her philosophy student male friends who validate her as a fascinating, smart and witty individual she’s not. Once they turn exclusive men tend to develop deep loathing for her, which is fine because she loathes them back. Chad of Choice: Her philosophy or English literature professor, at least until they finally have sex
LEVEL 8: Manic Pixie Dream Girl
Very beautiful face that always made men idolize her over slutty big tittied Stacies. Never really felt overly pressured to compete with women in her surrounding because men always fell in love with her whenever she smiled at them. Isn’t completely dumb but her energy is mainly focused on unproductive self analysis because everyone convinced her she's fascinating. What she needs validated is that this is really true, because on some level she knows that she is actually pretty boring. Her challenge is picking the right Chad worth settling for, and in the process she breaks many men’s hearts and egos. She doesn’t really know what to focus on and doesn’t like to feel like a bad person, so she deals with her hypergamy by creating a very flaky, inconsistent personality that mirrors adored and special types of women in popular culture. Often turns to drugs out of boredom but without seriously committing to them either, and develops existential depression every time she gets too settled into anything, because she is never sure if she’s missing out on something better. She looks for artistic talent Chads to provide what she herself can’t in her hopeless, exhausting attempts to be creative. Her taste in art boils down to her appreciating whatever is pretentious enough to make her think she doesn't get it. Chad of Choice: Lead singers from hipster bands such as Arctic Monkeys
LEVEL 9: The Unicorn
Had at least one big trauma or unhappy childhood which fucked her up, combined with receiving extreme adoration from men later in life. This created a fun mix of insecurity and ego, and a few mental disorders. She is usually a very sexually conflicted asexual. She has a good ability to at least subconsciously read people and she adapts her personality to mirror the fantasies of the men she is talking to. This is because she is always looking to be everyone’s everything. Her introductions are great, after which she enters a depressive phase and then goes into total destruction mode. Because she wants to leave a lasting impact without restricting herself to one person or one life, she does it by leaving scars so that they think of her even in her absence. She can’t fall in love with individual men, and is mainly solipsistic. Thinks of herself as completely emotionally empty and most likely is an addict, but can keep on bouncing back for a while due to everyone in the world wanting to support her. Chad of Choice: N/A
Level 10: Level 9 that manages to murder you and through it become the most significant person in your life while also being free of you and able to play the same crucial role in other people's lives. Role only reserved for a small percentage of female psychopaths, but if you're searching for one, places like this is where you find them so don't stop believing....

Alia_Harkonnen, r/incels 21 Comments [5/14/2017 10:24:33 PM]
Fundie Index: 7
Submitted By: The Reptilian Jew
WTF?! || meh